Emotional inteligence

aygun.shukurova
from aygun.shukurova More from this publisher
04.02.2022 Views

164/661provoking arguments and fights. And, after all thoseyears, they still were unable to put off gratification.What shows up in a small way early in life blossomsinto a wide range of social and emotional competencesas life goes on. The capacity to impose a delay on impulseis at the root of a plethora of efforts, from stayingon a diet to pursuing a medical degree. Some children,even at four, had mastered the basics: they were able toread the social situation as one where delay was beneficial,to pry their attention from focusing on the temptationat hand, and to distract themselves while maintainingthe necessary perseverance toward their goal—thetwo marshmallows.Even more surprising, when the tested children wereevaluated again as they were finishing high school, thosewho had waited patiently at four were far superior asstudents to those who had acted on whim. According totheir parents' evaluations, they were more academicallycompetent: better able to put their ideas into words, touse and respond to reason, to concentrate, to makeplans and follow through on them, and more eager tolearn. Most astonishingly, they had dramatically higherscores on their SAT tests. The third of children who atfour grabbed for the marshmallow most eagerly had anaverage verbal score of 524 and quantitative (or "math")score of 528; the third who waited longest had average

165/661scores of 610 and 652, respectively—a 210-point differencein total score. 8At age four, how children do on this test of delay ofgratification is twice as powerful a predictor of whattheir SAT scores will be as is IQ at age four; IQ becomesa stronger predictor of SAT only after children learn toread. 9 This suggests that the ability to delay gratificationcontributes powerfully to intellectual potential quiteapart from IQ itself. (Poor impulse control in childhoodis also a powerful predictor of later delinquency, againmore so than IQ. 10 ) As we shall see in Part Five, whilesome argue that IQ cannot be changed and so representsan unbendable limitation on a child's life potential,there is ample evidence that emotional skills such as impulsecontrol and accurately reading a social situationcan be learned.What Walter Mischel, who did the study, describeswith the rather infelicitous phrase "goal-directed selfimposeddelay of gratification" is perhaps the essence ofemotional self-regulation: the ability to deny impulse inthe service of a goal, whether it be building a business,solving an algebraic equation, or pursuing the StanleyCup. His finding underscores the role of emotional intelligenceas a meta-ability, determining how well or howpoorly people are able to use their other mentalcapacities.

164/661

provoking arguments and fights. And, after all those

years, they still were unable to put off gratification.

What shows up in a small way early in life blossoms

into a wide range of social and emotional competences

as life goes on. The capacity to impose a delay on impulse

is at the root of a plethora of efforts, from staying

on a diet to pursuing a medical degree. Some children,

even at four, had mastered the basics: they were able to

read the social situation as one where delay was beneficial,

to pry their attention from focusing on the temptation

at hand, and to distract themselves while maintaining

the necessary perseverance toward their goal—the

two marshmallows.

Even more surprising, when the tested children were

evaluated again as they were finishing high school, those

who had waited patiently at four were far superior as

students to those who had acted on whim. According to

their parents' evaluations, they were more academically

competent: better able to put their ideas into words, to

use and respond to reason, to concentrate, to make

plans and follow through on them, and more eager to

learn. Most astonishingly, they had dramatically higher

scores on their SAT tests. The third of children who at

four grabbed for the marshmallow most eagerly had an

average verbal score of 524 and quantitative (or "math")

score of 528; the third who waited longest had average

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!