20.01.2022 Views

Autumn 2017 EN

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Biogas Journal | <strong>Autumn</strong>_<strong>2017</strong> English Issue<br />

The main reasons for these results lie in the features<br />

of this sector, set out at the beginning of this article:<br />

mainly grazing systems with an average of 5 to 6 hours<br />

of confinement per day and excess water in the slurries<br />

(due to washing and rain). This means that the 0.2 m 3<br />

CH 4<br />

/cow/day of biogas and methane (energy) obtained<br />

are insufficient to recover the investment within a reasonable<br />

period.<br />

Another factor that contributes to this low profitability<br />

is that the thermal energy required by dairy farms is<br />

mainly supplied by firewood from the same property,<br />

obtained at a very low cost. On the other hand, bovine<br />

slurries in Chile do not have a large environmental impact<br />

as opposed to other waste, such as those from<br />

the pig industry where implementing biogas offers an<br />

alternative in order to avoid fines or even closure for<br />

non-compliance with the law.<br />

Therefore, finding the key to encouraging the development<br />

of a biogas market for self-consumption in the<br />

Chilean dairy sector is still a challenge. That is why it<br />

is necessary to keep producing public technical and<br />

economic information, as well as moving forward in<br />

training professionals and technicians for the design<br />

and operation of biogas plants. These challenges will be<br />

addressed by the GEF Biogas programme during <strong>2017</strong><br />

and 2018, but it will undoubtedly require a continuous<br />

effort that also includes other agricultural sectors,<br />

encouraging a more efficient use of water and understanding<br />

biogas technology mainly as an affordable and<br />

sustainable option for waste treatment.<br />

In the particular case of Chile, which does not have a<br />

grant policy for developing renewable technologies, it<br />

is key to search for new business models that enable<br />

the farmer to finance these projects, such as the ESCO<br />

model or an associative model. It is also necessary to<br />

look for ways to transform all the non-energy benefits of<br />

a biogas project into financial benefits for the farmer,<br />

such as those derived from a cleaner production, using<br />

digestates for fertilising grasslands and more efficient<br />

use of water, etc.<br />

Authors<br />

Marianela Rosas<br />

Regional Coordinator of the GEF/UNIDO project<br />

Javier Obach<br />

National Coordinator of the GEF/UNIDO project<br />

Christian Malebrán<br />

Chilean Ministry of Energy, Division of renewable energies<br />

Director of the GEF/UNIDO project<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!