Drug Decriminalization in Maryland Through an African Centered Research Paradigm- Analysis and Recommendations

This document offers guidance for theorizing questions related to a proposed research project purposed to advance drug decriminalization in Maryland. This document offers guidance for theorizing questions related to a proposed research project purposed to advance drug decriminalization in Maryland.

08.01.2022 Views

“The mysterious transformation of ordinary people into drug addicts urgently requires explanation. Fortunately, addiction is well suited to theoretical analysis because it refers to a single recognisable phenomenon, whatever drug is involved, including alcohol. Unfortunately, however, analysis of addiction is hindered by the secretiveness of addicts, because drug addictions are socially abhorrent or illegal. People in this situation have many reasons to lie to authorities. It is perhaps for this reason that theories of addiction are so often drawn from research on laboratory rats, an aspect of current scholarship that—I predict—future generations will find hilarious… Since the 19th century, however, the conventional wisdom has consistently viewed addiction as maladaptive and explained it with malign hidden causes like loss of will power to ‘addictive drugs’, unconscious fixations of the libido, deficiencies in the brain reward system, neural sensitisation to the reinforcing effects of drugs, and genes for addiction— or some combination of these. But theories based on these hidden causes have failed to generate either a generally believable account of addiction or anything more than marginally effective forms of therapy. A reasonable conclusion after more than a century of frustrated searching for the hidden underlying disorder is that it does not exist. Addiction is, in fact, not maladaptive for growing numbers of people under the dislocating conditions of our era. There is no underlying disorder. Although only dislocated people become addicted, many severely dislocated people live and die in ways that cannot be called ‘addiction’ without stretching the word too thin. Many of them ‘get by’ by dint of admirable resolution and a little help from their friends. Others may become depressed, suicidal, apathetic, murderous, or mentally erratic, rather than addicted. Thus, dislocation is a necessary, but not sufficient, cause of addiction. As psychosocial integration is a fundamental human need, and free-market society, by its nature, produces mass dislocation at all times (not just during times of collapse), and as addiction is the predominant way of adapting to dislocation, addiction is endemic and spreading fast. Free-market society can no more be addiction-free than it can be free of intense competition, income disparity, environmental destruction, unequal access to lifesaving medical care, or dishonest business practices. There can be no ‘technical fix’ or ‘market solution’ for problems that are built into the structure of society itself. Instead, today’s society must either modify its free-market structure enough to keep its side effects under control or watch these side effects continue to spread.” (Alexander, Bruce, 2010). Ani explains how social science reflects a technocentric vision of material progress, and Alexander explains how our contemporary addiction crisis is linked to the loss of psychosocial integration this “free market society” produces. If this is true, it is essential that we not use the scientific 4151 Park Heights Avenue, Suite 207, Baltimore, MD 21215 • www.lbsbaltimore.com • (410) 374-7683

paradigms and tools created by the social sciences of a “free market society” to attempt to solve the problems this society produces (i.e., addiction). Alternative Methodologies - African American Research Paradigms While the tenants of the research Schiele outlines may represent the tenants of the dominant methodology of scientific research, it is not the only paradigm available. Here we can begin to analyze what I call African Centered Research Paradigms. I use this specific term as it is inclusive of multiple different ways of describing research methodologies guided by the culture, knowledge production practices, and experiences of people of African descent. As there is diversity within African peoples, there are multiple different Black scholars with different versions of what could be called African Centered Research Paradigms. The goal here is not to attempt to parse one from the other meticulously but to take a general conceptual understanding of what the paradigms bring to the research process and what general characteristics reflect researchers using these methodologies. One additional note on terminology, many scholars use the term “Afrocentric” to describe these practices, including many who will be cited in this report. As this term is used increasingly to describe the specific methods of research produced by Temple University professor Molefi Asante and his academic disciples, we feel it is more accurate to use the term “African Centered” to reflect the diversity of scholars beyond those directly affiliated with Asante and Temple University. Na’im Akbar outlines the tenants of what he calls the African American Research Paradigm (i.e. AARP), a process where the author attempts to proceed through four distinct research phrases to produce knowledge explicitly in the service of liberation. Akbar writes: “The second issue of methodology is the "how" or types of research procedures that appropriately address the model. There are four (4) general types of research which are most relevant to an African American paradigm: (1) theoretical, (2) critique of falsification (deconstruction) research, (3) ethnographic, and (4) heuristic (construction or reconstruction) research. Theoretical research is for the purpose of generating questions. Theory development grows from self-reflective observation and the introspective analysis of ones (collective) experiences. No data beyond ones subjective and affective appraisal of the observer's experience are necessary. This is not unlike the procedure for the ground breaking and paradigm-setting work of Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, William James, B.F. Skinner and the vast array of luminaries in all fields of social science research who never produced a control group while laying the corner- stone for Western thought. Once a logically 4151 Park Heights Avenue, Suite 207, Baltimore, MD 21215 • www.lbsbaltimore.com • (410) 374-7683

“The mysterious tr<strong>an</strong>sformation of ord<strong>in</strong>ary people <strong>in</strong>to drug addicts urgently requires<br />

expl<strong>an</strong>ation. Fortunately, addiction is well suited to theoretical <strong>an</strong>alysis because it refers<br />

to a s<strong>in</strong>gle recognisable phenomenon, whatever drug is <strong>in</strong>volved, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g alcohol.<br />

Unfortunately, however, <strong>an</strong>alysis of addiction is h<strong>in</strong>dered by the secretiveness of addicts,<br />

because drug addictions are socially abhorrent or illegal. People <strong>in</strong> this situation have<br />

m<strong>an</strong>y reasons to lie to authorities. It is perhaps for this reason that theories of addiction<br />

are so often drawn from research on laboratory rats, <strong>an</strong> aspect of current scholarship<br />

that—I predict—future generations will f<strong>in</strong>d hilarious…<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the 19th century, however, the conventional wisdom has consistently viewed<br />

addiction as maladaptive <strong>an</strong>d expla<strong>in</strong>ed it with malign hidden causes like loss of will power<br />

to ‘addictive drugs’, unconscious fixations of the libido, deficiencies <strong>in</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong> reward<br />

system, neural sensitisation to the re<strong>in</strong>forc<strong>in</strong>g effects of drugs, <strong>an</strong>d genes for addiction—<br />

or some comb<strong>in</strong>ation of these. But theories based on these hidden causes have failed to<br />

generate either a generally believable account of addiction or <strong>an</strong>yth<strong>in</strong>g more th<strong>an</strong><br />

marg<strong>in</strong>ally effective forms of therapy. A reasonable conclusion after more th<strong>an</strong> a century<br />

of frustrated search<strong>in</strong>g for the hidden underly<strong>in</strong>g disorder is that it does not exist. Addiction<br />

is, <strong>in</strong> fact, not maladaptive for grow<strong>in</strong>g numbers of people under the dislocat<strong>in</strong>g conditions<br />

of our era. There is no underly<strong>in</strong>g disorder. Although only dislocated people become<br />

addicted, m<strong>an</strong>y severely dislocated people<br />

live <strong>an</strong>d die <strong>in</strong> ways that c<strong>an</strong>not be called ‘addiction’ without stretch<strong>in</strong>g the word too th<strong>in</strong>.<br />

M<strong>an</strong>y of them ‘get by’ by d<strong>in</strong>t of admirable resolution <strong>an</strong>d a little help from their friends.<br />

Others may become depressed, suicidal, apathetic, murderous, or mentally erratic, rather<br />

th<strong>an</strong> addicted. Thus, dislocation is a necessary, but not sufficient, cause of addiction.<br />

As psychosocial <strong>in</strong>tegration is a fundamental hum<strong>an</strong> need, <strong>an</strong>d free-market society, by its<br />

nature, produces mass dislocation at all times (not just dur<strong>in</strong>g times of collapse), <strong>an</strong>d as<br />

addiction is the predom<strong>in</strong><strong>an</strong>t way of adapt<strong>in</strong>g to dislocation, addiction is endemic <strong>an</strong>d<br />

spread<strong>in</strong>g fast. Free-market society c<strong>an</strong> no more be addiction-free th<strong>an</strong> it c<strong>an</strong> be free of<br />

<strong>in</strong>tense competition, <strong>in</strong>come disparity, environmental destruction, unequal access to lifesav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

medical care, or dishonest bus<strong>in</strong>ess practices. There c<strong>an</strong> be no ‘technical fix’ or<br />

‘market solution’ for problems that are built <strong>in</strong>to the structure of society itself. Instead,<br />

today’s society must either modify its free-market structure enough to keep its side effects<br />

under control or watch these side effects cont<strong>in</strong>ue to spread.” (Alex<strong>an</strong>der, Bruce, 2010).<br />

Ani expla<strong>in</strong>s how social science reflects a technocentric vision of material progress, <strong>an</strong>d Alex<strong>an</strong>der<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>s how our contemporary addiction crisis is l<strong>in</strong>ked to the loss of psychosocial <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />

this “free market society” produces. If this is true, it is essential that we not use the scientific<br />

4151 Park Heights Avenue, Suite 207, Baltimore, MD 21215 • www.lbsbaltimore.com • (410) 374-7683

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!