05.01.2022 Views

Newslink January 2022

Motor Schools Association of Great Britain, driving instructors, ADIs, driver training and testing, road safety

Motor Schools Association of Great Britain, driving instructors, ADIs, driver training and testing, road safety

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Towards Your CPD / News<br />

Theory X and Theory Y<br />

Instructional Styles<br />

Phil Burman<br />

In this article I quote<br />

from the work of<br />

Douglas Murray<br />

McGregor, who<br />

formulated the Theory X<br />

and Theory Y<br />

Instructional Styles<br />

hypothesis. He analysed two areas of<br />

behaviour in respect of:<br />

• The instructor’s style of tuition.<br />

• The way instructors treat pupils.<br />

Based on hundreds of hours of<br />

studying instructors in different fields,<br />

McGregor concluded that instructors tend<br />

to make one of two assumptions. In my<br />

view, his conclusions reflect the way<br />

many ADIs treat their pupils.<br />

According to McGregor, Theory X<br />

Instructors believe most pupils lack<br />

ability, are unintelligent, somewhat lazy,<br />

and avoid putting effort into learning<br />

whenever possible.<br />

He found Theory Y Instructors believe<br />

it is normal for pupils to work hard at<br />

their lessons.<br />

Each assumption leads the instructor<br />

to approach the task differently.<br />

Theory X instructors fall into two<br />

distinct camps. They either adopt a strict<br />

approach or a much too soft style of<br />

tuition. The strict approach results in:<br />

n Instructor-centred teaching.<br />

n The instructor controlling the lesson<br />

at all times.<br />

n Coercing the pupil with threats, for<br />

example: ‘If you do that, you’ll fail your<br />

test!’<br />

n A poor instructor-pupil relationship.<br />

n Pupils becoming resistant to<br />

instruction.<br />

n Pupils applying the minimum<br />

amount of effort.<br />

If the Theory X instructor utilises a soft<br />

style, his opinion remains the same, but<br />

he thinks pupils need continuous praise<br />

to learn. The praise might be insincere,<br />

but he says it anyway. This instructor is<br />

likely to be over tolerant of mistakes. But<br />

it doesn’t matter which approach the<br />

Theory X instructor takes because: either<br />

way, their tuition is inadequate<br />

The Theory Y instructor thinks the<br />

effort put into learning is natural, and he<br />

expects it. He uses a variety of tuition<br />

styles and is prepared to use whichever<br />

of the following methods bring the best<br />

results:<br />

n Consultation and participation.<br />

n Coaching.<br />

n Client-centred learning.<br />

n Instructor-centred teaching.<br />

n A hard-line approach.<br />

n A softly-softly approach.<br />

Theory Y instructor characteristics<br />

include:<br />

n Excellent listening skills.<br />

n A good understanding of body<br />

language.<br />

n Applying effort to fulfil a pupil’s<br />

potential, pushing them when necessary.<br />

n Believing there is no ‘one best way’<br />

that must be adhered to. The<br />

instructional method depends on the<br />

pupil and circumstances.<br />

n A supportive approach to learning.<br />

Theory Y instructors use different<br />

techniques and teaching aids and show<br />

commitment and skill. It seems there is a<br />

world of difference between the two<br />

instructor types.<br />

Yet McGregor states a common factor<br />

links Theory X and Theory Y instructors.<br />

He says both approaches have one<br />

overall effect, which he calls the selffulfilling<br />

prophecy.<br />

This common link means pupils<br />

invariably respond according to how they<br />

are treated. Think back to your school<br />

days. The subjects you liked and were<br />

good at – can you recall those teachers?<br />

If so, I’m sure they provided<br />

encouragement and treated you well.<br />

What about the others who couldn’t<br />

teach for toffee and blamed you for your<br />

lack of understanding? And those who<br />

handed out insults left, right and centre<br />

when they failed to get their points<br />

across. Need I say more?<br />

If we give the impression we think<br />

pupils are stupid, won’t work hard, have<br />

a couldn’t-care-less attitude and lack the<br />

expected level of skill, that’s the way<br />

they will respond.<br />

If we treat pupils with respect, show<br />

we think they are responsible, able and<br />

committed to working hard to achieve<br />

the required standard, that’s also the<br />

way they’ll behave.<br />

SPECIAL OFFER: Top Tips for Instructors<br />

On a different matter, I know how<br />

tough our job can be in normal times, let<br />

alone now. So I decided to put the<br />

knowledge and experience gained from<br />

almost 40 years into a format others may<br />

find helpful. My book, ‘The Top Ten Tips<br />

For Instructors’, explains how to increase<br />

prices successfully (which I believe are<br />

still too low), improve teaching results<br />

and continually maintain a full diary.<br />

Check out Amazon Kindle for ‘The Top<br />

Ten Tips For Instructors’ in the near<br />

future, or email me for the publication<br />

date.<br />

In the meantime, if you would like to<br />

see something in advance from ‘The Top<br />

Ten Tips For Instructors’, send an email<br />

to me at phil@philburman.com, and I’ll<br />

send you an article on Facebook<br />

advertising from marketing guru Nial<br />

Adams.<br />

It’s detailed, contains stacks of<br />

valuable tips, and there’s no charge for<br />

the advance copy.<br />

I am limited to the first 50 requests, so<br />

send for it now if you want it.<br />

The X and Y<br />

instructor:<br />

which camp do<br />

you fall in...?<br />

22<br />

NEWSLINK n JANUARY <strong>2022</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!