11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University 11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

24.12.2012 Views

Oral Mini-Symposium 10: Ecological Processes on Today's Reef Ecosystems 10-25 Herbivory Under Altered Community States -Is What You See What You Get? Rebecca FOX* 1 , David BELLWOOD 2 1 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Fadden, ACT, Australia, 2 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia Herbivorous fishes are widely acknowledged as a key element in maintaining the health and resilience of coral reef ecosystems. Quantifying the relative impact of individual species of herbivore is essential if we are to identify systems at risk of undergoing phaseshifts and develop an understanding of how such shifts could be reversed. Traditional approaches have used diver-based observations of herbivore abundance to quantify herbivory. But is what we see in terms of herbivore distribution really representative of all herbivorous activity occurring on coral reefs? We made use of remote underwater video cameras to observe the process of herbivory in the absence of divers under natural and altered community states, the latter being created using macroalgal transplants. Continuous recordings of the diurnal feeding activity of roving herbivores were made across different reef habitat zones and the impact (area of reef grazed per day) of each of the major species was quantified. While the overall pattern of relative grazing intensities across the reef under natural and degraded conditions coincided, the process of herbivory differed dramatically between the two states. Of the three dominant taxa recorded at the location under natural conditions, none played a role in the removal of macroalgae in the altered state. Instead, the agent of macroalgal removal was a species not previously recorded at the location. Our findings highlight that species critical to the healthy functioning and resilience of reef systems may have gone unnoticed in previous observations of natural foraging patterns. The implications of the differences in grazing activity among community states will be discussed in the context of herbivory as an agent of disturbance, and the potential roles of individual species in the resilience and recovery of coral reef ecosystems will be highlighted. 10-26 Herbivory On Coral Reefs: The Challenge Of Change David BELLWOOD* 1,2 1 Marine Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia, 2 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Australia This presentation will examine our understanding of the role of herbivorous fishes on coral reefs. Herbivory is widely accepted as one of the most important processes on coral reefs. Yet, despite over four decades of research on herbivory we are still at the stage of identifying the players and their respective roles. This apparent lack of progress reflects rapid changes in our understanding of the potential role of herbivorous fishes in ecosystem processes and the emergence of new challenges. Global warming and direct human activity are rapidly changing coral reef ecosystems. Herbivorous fishes have switched from animals that eat algae to critical functional groups with important roles in supporting reef resilience, preventing coral-algal phase shifts and underpinning reef regeneration. The key question now is: which of the herbivorous fishes are important for the future of coral reefs and why? In this presentation I will: a) provide an historical overview of research on fish based herbivory, with an emphasis on the Great Barrier Reef; b) examine the implications of recent methodological advances in the application of remote underwater video techniques; and c) explore our ability to critically evaluate the status of today’s coral reefs. 10-27 Continuing Decline Of montastraea Populations On Protected And Unprotected Reefs in The Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Struan SMITH* 1 , Richard ARONSON 2 , John OGDEN 3 1 Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 2 Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Dauphin Island, AL, 3 Florida Institute of Oceanography, St. Petersburg, FL Coral populations in Fully Protected Zones and on adjacent unprotected reefs in the Upper and Lower Florida Keys were assessed in terms of percent cover, recruitment, and juvenile and adult colony survival rates from 1998 to 2005. Analysis of random video transects showed that, overall, percent coral cover has declined by 50% on both protected and unprotected reefs during this period. The framework-building corals Montastraea spp. have declined in absolute cover from 5% to 2% in the Lower Keys and from 2% to 1% absolute cover in the Upper Keys on both protected and unprotected reefs. Censuses of corals in permanent quadrats revealed that three coral genera recruited successfully every year: Siderastrea spp. (5-10 m-2 yr-1), Porites spp. (1-2 m-2 yr-1), and Agaricia spp. (0.5-1 m-2 yr-1). However, the Montastraea annularis species complex have shown very low recruitment rates (

Oral Mini-Symposium 10: Ecological Processes on Today's Reef Ecosystems 10-29 Coral Reef Assemblages and Diversity in the Volcanic Northern Mariana Islands Peter HOUK* 1 , John STARMER 1 1 CNMI Marine Monitoring Program, Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands The volcanic Northern Mariana Islands (NMI) provide a unique opportunity to examine patterns in coral-reef assemblages, diversity, and reef growth due to varying island size, volcanic activity, and environmental regime. Initially, this study explores why patchy, inconsistent reef growth is evident throughout the archipelago by examining if there are linkages between ‘reef types’ and the modern assemblages growing upon them. The ‘reef types’ examined were: 1) volcanic boulders, 2) colonized boulders, 3) low-slope Holocene and sand, 4) complex, colonized Holocene, 5) complex, uncolonized Holocene, and 6) high-slope, sheltered Holocene. Replicated, quadrat-based surveys were conducted at 41 sites to gather coral colony size and taxon occurrence data. The initial results showed that ‘reef type’ acts as a good predictor of modern coral assemblages, however, taxon occurrence data showed less affiliation with ‘reef type’, rather an ‘island effect’ emerged. Most islands supported distinct populations of algae and invertebrate species. Building from this base, regressions between island size, volcanic disturbance, salinity, and species richness are interpreted to approach existing theories that explain diversity patterns. Notably, island size had a positive, log-log relationship with species richness across many phyla, including corals. The differing z-values, or rates of increase, suggest different levels of connectivity may exist between the local and regional populations for different phyla. Deviations from the expected species-area relationship for corals (e.g. residuals) were positively related to the number of years since volcanic activity has occurred. At a minimum, the presence of a favorable foundation is required for sustained coral growth, while coral populations and reef diversity rise on large islands that are less influenced by freshwater and volcanic disturbances. For the NMI specifically, the results provide a desirable context for developing management strategies to maintain and enhance the biological integrity of these remote islands. 10-30 The Rise And Fall Of A Coral Reef Ascidian Noa SHENKAR* 1 , Omri BRONSTEIN 2 , Yossi LOYA 1 1 Zoology Department, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 2 Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Although ascidians constitute a minor benthic component on exposed surfaces on natural coral reefs they play an important role in the carbon and nutrients cycles in coral reef ecosystems. Eutrophication of these ecosystems may result in vast changes in the densities and distribution of colonial ascidians and their interaction with benthic biota. In the coral reefs of Eilat, a new colonial ascidian, Botryllus eilatensis, has been observed rapidly colonizing artificial substrates and overgrowing dead coral skeletons. Monthly monitoring of 50 - 70 tagged coral colonies interacting with B. eilatensis was conducted in order to study overgrowth dynamics and the relationship between coral morphology, size, and orientation and ascidian overgrowth. Results show that the rate of B. eilatensis overgrowth was influenced by the coral's morphology and orientation combined with a seasonal appearance of the ascidian. During spring (April - June) the average ascidian cover percentage was 27 ± 4.6 %; decreasing rapidly during summer months. This seasonality is linked to the vertical mixing phenomenon that occurs in Eilat every winter. This was corroborated when B. eilatensis fragments translocated to a nutrient rich site were observed to increase three fold in size and exhibited higher survivorship rates in comparison to the intact fragments remained in a reference site. Increased anthropogenic activity, particularly the eutrophication occurring along the Israeli coasts, creates favorable conditions for filter-feeding organisms such as ascidians, providing them with an advantage in competition for space with reef-building corals and other organisms. 10-31 Population Dynamics Of The Corkscrew Anemone Bartholomea Annulata On Caribbean Coral Reefs: Implications For Anemoneshrimp Symbionts And Fish Cleaning Stations Michael NELSEN* 1 , Stephen RATCHFORD 2 , Nanette E. CHADWICK 1 1 Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 2 University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands (U.S.) Large sea anemones are conspicuous components of coral reef communities, yet little is known concerning their population dynamics. On Caribbean coral reefs, the corkscrew anemone Bartholomea annulata hosts an assemblage of obligate shrimp symbionts, some of which are important cleaners of parasites from large reef fish. Thus, the stability and recovery from disturbance of anemone host populations may impact the coral reef community at several trophic levels. During 2006-2008, we monitored the dynamics of populations of B. annulata at 2 coral reef sites near St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands. The abundance and body size of individuals both were significantly higher at an inshore than an offshore reef site. At both sites, recruitment was rapid and populations were extremely dynamic. Rates of growth and mortality decreased with body size; small individuals tended to either grow rapidly or die, while large individuals either shrank or did not change in size, and rarely died. Some individuals in all size classes reproduced asexually to produce small buds (clonal replicates), resulting in a rapid potential expansion of populations. We applied matrix modeling and sensitivity analyses to determine which life stage most impacted change in these populations. Based on these demographic characteristics, we also provide recommendations for the support of a sustainable fishery on these anemones, which are heavily collected for the ornamental aquarium trade. We conclude that rapid population turnover in this sea anemone leads to radiating effects on the stability of obligate anemoneshrimps and the location of fish cleaning stations on Caribbean reefs. 10-32 What Is The Future Of The Threatened acropora Palmata? Population Projections And Management Recommendations Tali VARDI* 1 , Dana E. WILLIAMS 2,3 , K. Lindsey KRAMER 4 1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, 2 Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, University of Miami RSMAS, Miami, FL, 3 Southeast Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Miami, 4 Pacific Island Network Inventory and Monitoring Program, National Park Service, Kailua-Kona, HI Acropora palmata was once the dominant hermatypic coral in shallow reef environments throughout the Caribbean, Florida, and Bahamas. Since the 1980s it has suffered a 97% decline in abundance throughout its range and was included on the US Endangered Species List in 2006. Despite the dramatic nature of this decline, and the loss of habitat that would be caused by an extinction, neither abundance nor rates of decline have been documented systematically throughout the Caribbean. In Autumn 2007, abundance of Acropora palmata was estimated in Florida, Puerto Rico, Jamaica, Virgin Gorda, and Curaçao. Abundance in Florida was dramatically lower than in other sites. The scarcity of Acropora palmata in Florida is explained by increased hurricanes and disease, problems that are difficult to manage. To explore population changes in more detail and to help identify life history stages most affected, a sizebased population model was developed. Based on Acropora palmata’s population trajectory since 2004, as measured by a standardized, size-based demographic monitoring protocol in the Florida Keys, the local population will reach a stable distribution in 20 years. At that time, the current population structure, in which 35% are pre-reproductive and 45% are reproductive, will have become dominated by pre-reproductive individuals and only 20% of colonies will reproduce sexually. This loss of large individuals would also reduce the number of asexually derived fragments, leading to an overall decrease in abundance of colonies in Florida. Parallel data from the island of Curaçao from 2006-7, show both a greater overall abundance of Acropora palmata and no significant change in the relative abundance of larger individuals. Significant changes in size distribution can warn of impending phase shifts. These results suggest that determining and eliminating the causes of mortality in large adults are key conservation priorities for Florida reefs. 80

Oral Mini-Symposium 10: Ecological Processes on Today's Reef Ecosystems<br />

10-25<br />

Herbivory Under Altered Community States -Is What You See What You Get?<br />

Rebecca FOX* 1 , David BELLWOOD 2<br />

1 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, School of Marine and Tropical<br />

Biology, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Fadden, ACT, Australia, 2 ARC Centre of Excellence<br />

for Coral Reef Studies, School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook <strong>University</strong>,<br />

Townsville, QLD, Australia<br />

Herbivorous fishes are widely acknowledged as a key element in maintaining the health<br />

and resilience of coral reef ecosystems. Quantifying the relative impact of individual<br />

species of herbivore is essential if we are to identify systems at risk of undergoing phaseshifts<br />

and develop an understanding of how such shifts could be reversed. Traditional<br />

approaches have used diver-based observations of herbivore abundance to quantify<br />

herbivory. But is what we see in terms of herbivore distribution really representative of<br />

all herbivorous activity occurring on coral reefs? We made use of remote underwater<br />

video cameras to observe the process of herbivory in the absence of divers under natural<br />

and altered community states, the latter being created using macroalgal transplants.<br />

Continuous recordings of the diurnal feeding activity of roving herbivores were made<br />

across different reef habitat zones and the impact (area of reef grazed per day) of each of<br />

the major species was quantified. While the overall pattern of relative grazing intensities<br />

across the reef under natural and degraded conditions coincided, the process of herbivory<br />

differed dramatically between the two states. Of the three dominant taxa recorded at the<br />

location under natural conditions, none played a role in the removal of macroalgae in the<br />

altered state. Instead, the agent of macroalgal removal was a species not previously<br />

recorded at the location. Our findings highlight that species critical to the healthy<br />

functioning and resilience of reef systems may have gone unnoticed in previous<br />

observations of natural foraging patterns. The implications of the differences in grazing<br />

activity among community states will be discussed in the context of herbivory as an agent<br />

of disturbance, and the potential roles of individual species in the resilience and recovery<br />

of coral reef ecosystems will be highlighted.<br />

10-26<br />

Herbivory On Coral Reefs: The Challenge Of Change<br />

David BELLWOOD* 1,2<br />

1 Marine Biology, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Townsville, Australia, 2 ARC Centre of<br />

Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Australia<br />

This presentation will examine our understanding of the role of herbivorous fishes on<br />

coral reefs. Herbivory is widely accepted as one of the most important processes on coral<br />

reefs. Yet, despite over four decades of research on herbivory we are still at the stage of<br />

identifying the players and their respective roles. This apparent lack of progress reflects<br />

rapid changes in our understanding of the potential role of herbivorous fishes in<br />

ecosystem processes and the emergence of new challenges. Global warming and direct<br />

human activity are rapidly changing coral reef ecosystems. Herbivorous fishes have<br />

switched from animals that eat algae to critical functional groups with important roles in<br />

supporting reef resilience, preventing coral-algal phase shifts and underpinning reef<br />

regeneration. The key question now is: which of the herbivorous fishes are important for<br />

the future of coral reefs and why? In this presentation I will: a) provide an historical<br />

overview of research on fish based herbivory, with an emphasis on the Great Barrier<br />

Reef; b) examine the implications of recent methodological advances in the application of<br />

remote underwater video techniques; and c) explore our ability to critically evaluate the<br />

status of today’s coral reefs.<br />

10-27<br />

Continuing Decline Of montastraea Populations On Protected And Unprotected Reefs in<br />

The Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary.<br />

Struan SMITH* 1 , Richard ARONSON 2 , John OGDEN 3<br />

1 Georgia State <strong>University</strong>, Atlanta, GA, 2 Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Dauphin Island, AL, 3 Florida<br />

Institute of Oceanography, St. Petersburg, FL<br />

Coral populations in Fully Protected Zones and on adjacent unprotected reefs in the Upper and<br />

Lower Florida Keys were assessed in terms of percent cover, recruitment, and juvenile and<br />

adult colony survival rates from 1998 to 2005. Analysis of random video transects showed that,<br />

overall, percent coral cover has declined by 50% on both protected and unprotected reefs during<br />

this period. The framework-building corals Montastraea spp. have declined in absolute cover<br />

from 5% to 2% in the Lower Keys and from 2% to 1% absolute cover in the Upper Keys on<br />

both protected and unprotected reefs. Censuses of corals in permanent quadrats revealed that<br />

three coral genera recruited successfully every year: Siderastrea spp. (5-10 m-2 yr-1), Porites<br />

spp. (1-2 m-2 yr-1), and Agaricia spp. (0.5-1 m-2 yr-1). However, the Montastraea annularis<br />

species complex have shown very low recruitment rates (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!