24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8-13<br />

Assessment Of Coral Microbiota: The Impact Of Untested Assumptions,<br />

Unintended Biases, And Undefined Variables<br />

Shawn POLSON 1,2 , Sara POLSON 1 , Julie HIGGINS 1 , Cheryl WOODLEY* 1<br />

1 Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research, NOAA National<br />

Ocean Service, Charleston, SC, 2 Marine Biomedicine and Environmental Sciences<br />

Center, Medical <strong>University</strong> of South Carolina, Charleston, SC<br />

The study of microbiology has emerged as an important component of coral biology, with<br />

numerous studies examining coral-associated microbial ecology in hopes of<br />

understanding the dynamic nature of these communities. Such studies have provided<br />

numerous insights into the composition of these communities, but a significant level of<br />

project-to-project variability is apparent when reviewing these results. The study<br />

presented here utilized culture-dependent (~650 isolates) and independent (~25,000<br />

sequences from 88 16S rDNA libraries) analyses to assess the microbial community<br />

structure associated with acroporid corals of the Florida reef tract (USA). The study was<br />

designed to allow for the impact of multiple sample variables including sample<br />

collection/processing methodology, disease state, acroporid species, regional geography,<br />

and limited temporal variation to be simultaneously assessed. Sample processing<br />

methodology was found to introduce significant bias into the resulting microbial<br />

community composition detected. Lumping coral health states into defined “diseases”,<br />

based solely upon field observations of similarity in disease signs, was also demonstrated<br />

to be a potential source of variation found in the past literature. The existence of marked<br />

temporal variation within a population of corals was also detected. The results of this<br />

study indicate that future studies of coral-associated microbial communities must take<br />

great care to control for numerous variables (many of which are currently poorly<br />

understood). Key among these factors is an in depth assessment of the physiological<br />

state of the coral during sample collection. Without increased efforts to address the role<br />

of such secondary variables on microbial community composition (both actual and<br />

detected) it is likely that increased fragmentation in the body of literature will occur,<br />

hampering efforts to understand the nature of this important component of the coral<br />

holobiont.<br />

8-14<br />

Changes in Coral Associated Microbial Communities During A Bleaching Event<br />

David BOURNE* 1 , Yuki IIDA 1 , Sven UTHICKE 1 , Carolyn SMITH-KEUNE 1,2<br />

1 Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia, 2 Centre of Marine Studies,<br />

<strong>University</strong> of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia<br />

Environmental stressors such as increased sea surface temperatures are well known for<br />

contributing to coral bleaching, however the effect of increased temperatures and<br />

subsequent bleaching on coral associated microbial communities is poorly understood.<br />

Colonies of the hard coral Acropora millepora were tagged on a reef flat off Magnetic<br />

Island (Great Barrier Reef) and surveyed over 2.5 years, which included a severe<br />

bleaching event in January/February 2002. Daily average water temperatures exceeded<br />

the previous 10-year average by more than 1ºC for extended periods with field based<br />

visual surveys recording all tagged colonies displaying signs of bleaching. During the<br />

bleaching period, direct counts of coral zooxanthellae densities decreased by ~64%,<br />

before recovery to pre-bleaching levels after the thermal stress event. A subset of three<br />

tagged coral colonies were sampled through the bleaching event and changes in the<br />

microbial community elucidated. DGGE analysis demonstrated conserved bacterial<br />

banding profiles between the three coral colonies confirming previous studies<br />

highlighting specific microbial associations. As coral colonies bleached, the microbial<br />

community shifted and redundancy analysis (RDA) of DGGE-banding patterns revealed<br />

a correlation of increasing temperature with the appearance of Vibrio-affiliated<br />

sequences. Clone libraries hybridised with Vibrio-specific oligonucleotide probes<br />

confirmed an increase in the fraction of Vibrio-affiliated clones during the bleaching<br />

period. Post-bleaching, the coral microbial associations again shifted, returning to a<br />

profile similar or identical to the fingerprints prior to bleaching. This provided further<br />

evidence for corals selecting and shaping their microbial partners. For non-bleached<br />

samples, a close association with Spongiobacter related sequences were revealed by both<br />

clone libraries and DGGE profiling. Despite Vibrio species being previously implicated<br />

in bleaching of specific coral species, it is unsure if the relative increase in retrieved<br />

Vibrio sequences is due to bacterial infection or an opportunistic response to<br />

compromised health and changing environmental parameters of the coral host.<br />

Oral Mini-Symposium 8: Coral Microbial Interactions<br />

8-15<br />

Metagenomic Analysis Of The Microbial Community Associated With The Coral Porites<br />

Astreoides<br />

Linda WEGLEY 1 , Robert EDWARDS* 2 , Forest ROHWER 1<br />

1 Biology, San Diego State <strong>University</strong>, San Diego, CA, 2 San Diego State <strong>University</strong>, San Diego,<br />

CA<br />

The coral holobiont is a dynamic assemblage of the coral animal, zooxanthellae, endolithic<br />

algae and fungi, Bacteria, Archaea and viruses. Zooxanthellae and some Bacteria form<br />

relatively stable and species-specific associations with corals. The symbiontic algae, or<br />

zooxanthellae, that reside within the coral tissues have been studied extensively, however very<br />

little is understood about the other microbes within the coral holobiont. To better understand the<br />

roles of the microbes associated with corals, a fractionation procedure was used to separate the<br />

microbes, mitochondria, and viruses from the coral animal cells and zooxanthellae. The<br />

resulting metagenomic DNA was sequenced using pyrosequencing. Fungi, Bacteria, and phage<br />

were the most commonly identified organisms in the metagenome. Three of the four fungal<br />

phyla were represented, including a wide diversity of fungal genes involved in carbon and<br />

nitrogen metabolism, suggesting that the endolithic community is more important than<br />

previously appreciated. In particular, the data suggested that endolithic fungi could be<br />

converting nitrate and nitrite to ammonia, which would enable fixed-nitrogen to cycle within<br />

the coral holobiont. The most prominent bacterial groups were Proteobacteria (68%),<br />

Firmicutes (10%), Cyanobacteria (7%), and Actinobacteria (6%). Functionally, the bacterial<br />

community was primarily heterotrophic and included a number of pathways for the degradation<br />

of aromatic compounds, the most abundant being the homogentisate pathway. The most<br />

abundant phage family was the ssDNA Microphage and most of the eukaryotic viruses were<br />

most closely related to those known to infect aquatic organisms. This study provides a<br />

metabolic and taxonomic snapshot of microbes associated with the reef-building coral Porites<br />

astreoides and presents a basis for understanding how coral-microbial interactions structure the<br />

holobiont and coral reefs.<br />

8-16<br />

Comparison of bacterial communities on corals containing different Symbiodinium<br />

(Zooxanthellae) clades<br />

Raechel LITTMAN* 1 , David BOURNE 2 , Bette WILLIS 1<br />

1 Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Townsville, Australia, 2 Australian<br />

Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia<br />

Reef-building corals host a variety of micro-organisms, including symbiotic dinoflagellates,<br />

Symbiodinium (zooxanthellae) and an array of bacteria. Previous studies have suggested that<br />

bacteria can provide many benefits to corals through fixation and passage of nitrogen and<br />

carbon to the coral host and production of secondary metabolites such as antibiotics. Many of<br />

the coral’s nutritional needs are supplied by Symbiodinium, and it has been shown that different<br />

genetic types of this algal symbiont differentially affect the physiology of the coral host. For<br />

instance, corals containing Symbiodinium clade D tend to be more tolerant to heat stress.<br />

However, little is known about how Symbiodinium affects the entire holobiont. Arguably,<br />

changes in the algal symbionts may lead to differences in the bacterial populations on corals.<br />

For instance, Symbiodinium contributes to the mucus layer, providing nutrients to potentially<br />

important bacterial inhabitants. To aid in our understanding of possible interactions between<br />

bacterial and Symbiodinium communities, this study compares bacteria community profiles of<br />

juvenile Acropora millepora and A. tenuis experimentally infected with two different clades of<br />

Symbiodinium, C1 and D. Moreover, bacterial communities are compared on corals containing<br />

C1 and D that have been experimentally bleached to determine whether coral-associated<br />

bacterial communities are more resilient to change on corals containing heat tolerant algal<br />

symbionts. This will aid in understanding the relationships between microbial inhabitants and<br />

how these communities can be destabilized if Symbiodinium is lost from the host.<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!