24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7-17<br />

Spatial variation in aspergillosis and the mycoflora associated to Gorgonia ventalina<br />

in Puerto Rico.<br />

Anabella ZULUAGA-MONTERO* 1 , Carlos TOLEDO-HERNÁNDEZ 1 , Jose Antonio<br />

RODRÍGUEZ 1 , Paul BAYMAN 1 , Alberto SABAT 1<br />

1 Biology, <strong>University</strong> of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico<br />

Most of the coral disease literature has focused on identifying potential pathogens or<br />

environmental factors linked to disease. However, to better understand the etiology of<br />

coral diseases it is also necessary to increase our knowledge of the basic ecology of<br />

marine microorganisms. Many fungal species reported in marine organisms are common<br />

in land, but very little is known about their distribution in marine ecosystems. The<br />

objectives of this study were to determine the spatial variation in prevalence of<br />

aspergillosis, and relate it to the mycoflora associated with healthy and diseased colonies.<br />

We measured prevalence at three times during one year at six reefs sites. Colonies were<br />

tagged, photographed and categorized as healthy or diseased. The mycoflora associated<br />

to G. ventalina was identified by morphology and sequencing of the ITS region. We<br />

found significant differences in aspergillosis prevalence among sites. We also found<br />

significant spatial variation in the composition of the fungi community, and between<br />

healthy and diseased sea fans. However, sites with high or low prevalence did not have a<br />

distinctive mycoflora. Aspergillus flavus was an ubiquitous isolate at almost all sites, as<br />

well as in diseased and healthy colonies. A. sydowii was not isolated from diseased<br />

colonies. The main cause of colony death was detachment, followed by colonies that<br />

were overgrown by fouling organisms, and least by aspergillosis. The significant spatial<br />

variation in the fungi community suggests that local environmental factors are<br />

influencing the fungal composition of sea fans. The fact that A. sydowii was not isolated<br />

from diseased tissue from any reef site supports the argument that aspergillosis may be<br />

caused by a polymicrobial consortium. The data also indicates that aspergillosis is not a<br />

significant cause of mortality for sea fans in Puerto Rico.<br />

7-18<br />

Emerging Infectious Diseases Of Coral Reef Sponges: aplysina Red Band<br />

Syndrome On Caribbean Reefs<br />

Deborah J. GOCHFELD* 1,2 , Robert W. THACKER 3 , Julie B. OLSON 4<br />

1 National Center for Natural Products Research, <strong>University</strong> of Mississippi, <strong>University</strong>,<br />

MS, 2 Environmental Toxicology Research Program, <strong>University</strong> of Mississippi,<br />

3<br />

<strong>University</strong>, Department of Biology, <strong>University</strong> of Alabama at Birmingham,<br />

Birmingham, AL, 4 Department of Biological Sciences, <strong>University</strong> of Alabama,<br />

Tuscaloosa, AL<br />

A substantial and increasing number of reports have documented dramatic changes and<br />

continuing declines in the health of Caribbean coral reef communities over the past few<br />

decades. Disease is often implicated as a major factor contributing to these declines. To<br />

date, most disease reports have focused on scleractinian corals, whereas sponge diseases<br />

have been less frequently documented. Here we describe Aplysina Red Band Syndrome<br />

(ARBS), which affects Caribbean rope sponges. Visible signs of disease presence<br />

include one or more rust-colored leading edges, with a trailing area of necrotic tissue,<br />

such that the lesion forms a contiguous band around a portion or the entire sponge<br />

branch. Microscopic examination of the leading edge of the disease margin indicates that<br />

filamentous cyanobacteria are responsible for the coloration. Although the presence of<br />

this distinctive coloration is used to characterize the diseased state, it is not yet known<br />

whether this cyanobacterium is directly responsible for disease causation. Approximately<br />

10% of the Aplysina cauliformis sponges on reefs near Lee Stocking Island, Bahamas,<br />

are affected by ARBS, and the disease has also been observed on reefs at other Caribbean<br />

sites. Transmission studies in the lab and field demonstrated that contact with an active<br />

lesion's leading edge was sufficient to spread ARBS to a healthy sponge, suggesting that<br />

the etiologic agent, currently undescribed, is contagious. Population studies indicate<br />

clumping of diseased individuals on the reef, but the presence of affected individuals in<br />

isolation suggests that waterborne transmission is also likely. Studies to elucidate the<br />

etiologic agent of ARBS are ongoing. Sponges are an essential component of coral reef<br />

communities and emerging sponge diseases have the potential to impact benthic diversity<br />

and community structure on coral reefs.<br />

Oral Mini-Symposium 7: Diseases on Coral Reefs<br />

7-19<br />

The Pathological Studies Of Skeletal Anomaly in The Coral porites Australiensis<br />

Naoko YASUDA* 1 , Yoshikatsu NAKANO 2 , Hideyuki YAMASHIRO 3 , Michio HIDAKA 4<br />

1 Department of Marine and Environmental Science, Graduate School of Engineering and<br />

Science, <strong>University</strong> of the Ryukyus, Nishihara, Japan, 2 Sesoko Station, Tropical Biosphere<br />

Research Center, <strong>University</strong> of the Ryukyus, Motobu, Japan, 3 Department of Bioresources<br />

Engineering, Okinawa National College of Technology, Nago, Japan, 4 Department of<br />

Chemistry, Biology and Marine Science, Faculity of Science, <strong>University</strong> of the Ryukyus,<br />

Nishihara, Japan<br />

The skeletal anomalies (SAs) of the scleractinian corals have been reported from reefs<br />

throughout the world and have been commonly referred to as ‘tumors’. The SAs are<br />

characterized by swelled and abnormal skeletal structures, reduced number of polyps, and fewer<br />

zooxanthellae as compared with healthy parts. Causative agents of SAs have not been<br />

identified. In this study, the pathological characteristics of the SAs developed on a colony of<br />

Porites australiensis in the reef at Kayo, Okinawa, Japan were investigated. The polyp density<br />

was reduced in the SA due to enlargement of both calices and the coenosteum. Corallites in the<br />

SA region lost the skeletal architecture characteristic to Porites australiensis. The soft tissue in<br />

the SA region contained fewer and smaller spermaries and thinner gastrodermis containing<br />

lower density of zooxanthellae than the adjacent ordinary tissue. The gross production of SA<br />

tissues was lower than that of ordinary tissues and it decreased to almost 0 in 9 days after<br />

isolation. However, when SA fragments were brought into contact with ordinary fragments<br />

from the same colony, they fused and both SA and ordinary regions grew. The growth rate of<br />

ordinary regions was lower when they were fused with SA fragments than those fused with<br />

ordinary fragments. The present results suggest that SAs may be maintained by energy supply<br />

from the surrounding healthy tissue. The SAs of the coral may act as parasite for host corals and<br />

eventually decrease the fitness of the host coral.<br />

7-20<br />

Is Increased Scarring Of Hard Corals From Disease Associated With Subsequent Declines<br />

in Coral Cover On Reefs Of The Great Barrier Reef.<br />

Ian MILLER* 1 , Andrew DOLMAN 1<br />

1 Long Term Monitoring, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia<br />

Increased reports of disease induced hard coral mortality in recent years have highlighted the<br />

emerging threat coral disease poses to reef ecosystems. To study the effects of coral disease on<br />

the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) the Australian Institute of Marine Science monitored causes of<br />

coral mortality on a suite of 48 reefs throughout the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) annually from<br />

1999 to 2005 and on a further 48 reefs biannually from 2006. Sampling consisted of<br />

categorising corals scars according to signs commonly associated with coral disease (white<br />

syndromes and black-band disease), crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS), Drupella spp. feeding<br />

activity and scars that could not be assigned directly to any of these categories. In 2005<br />

sampling was extended to include signs of recently defined disease formerly classified as white<br />

syndromes or band diseases (brown band disease, skeletal eroding band disease and<br />

atramentous necrosis). Of those categories recorded only increases in COTS scars were<br />

independently associated with subsequent declines in coral cover on survey reefs. Between<br />

1999 and 2005 there was no clear evidence to suggest there were any disease outbreaks that had<br />

a significant impact (above background levels) on live coral cover on survey reefs. This is<br />

despite the fact that scaring due to disease constitutes a relatively high proportion of the scars<br />

observed. This suggests that though disease plays an important role in GBR coral communities<br />

it mainly contributes to “background” levels of coral mortality. The relative proportion of scars<br />

recorded show that white syndrome and unknown scars make up the most common category of<br />

scars observed. The high proportion of scars from unknown sources suggests that the causes of<br />

many corals scars remain unexplained and highlights the difficulty classifying coral scars based<br />

on visual signs.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!