24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

23.971<br />

Linking Land Use And The Conservation Of A Threatened Coral Species: Using<br />

Watershed Analysis To Improve The Protection Of acropora Palmata<br />

Jeanne BROWN* 1 , Barry DEVINE 2 , Pedro NIEVES 2<br />

1 SE Caribbean Program, The Nature Conservancy, Christiansted, Virgin Islands (U.S.),<br />

2 Eastern Caribbean Center, Conservation Data Center, <strong>University</strong> of the Virgin Islands,<br />

St. Thomas, Virgin Islands (U.S.)<br />

Drastic reductions in abundance and range of Acropora palmata due to a number of<br />

factors attributed to natural and anthropogenic causes has had serious consequences to<br />

coastal systems. The protection of this threatened coral species relies on sound<br />

management of human activities. In the U.S. Virgin Islands, where there is a high rate of<br />

development in steeply-sloped coastal watersheds, water quality in the coastal zone has<br />

been degraded by runoff from land. This study examines the impact of sedimentation on<br />

the incidence of disease and mortality in A. palmata relative to adjacent watersheds with<br />

various levels of development. Using watershed characteristics, such as incline, number<br />

of gullies and proximity to roads and buildings, with sediment core samples in the<br />

watershed’s drainage area, the status and potential for recovery of A. palmata is linked to<br />

human activity on land. This analysis contributes to the information necessary to drive<br />

judicious decision-making and policy development of sustainable land use and protected<br />

area management.<br />

23.972<br />

User Fees as Sustainable Financing Mechnisms for Coral Reef Marine Protected<br />

Areas<br />

Steven THUR* 1<br />

1 Coral Reef Conservation Program, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration,<br />

Silver Spring, MD<br />

Coral reef marine protected areas (MPAs) have proliferated globally in the past three<br />

decades. However, inadequate funding often prevents these management regimes from<br />

fulfilling their missions. Managers have become increasingly aware that successful<br />

protection of reefs is dependent not only upon an understanding of their biological and<br />

physical processes, but also their associated social and economic aspects. Unfortunately,<br />

economic values associated with MPAs and the coral reef resources they protect are<br />

rarely considered in decision-making and policy development. This study fills this<br />

information gap by 1) examining scuba divers’ willingness to pay for access to quality<br />

recreational sites in the Bonaire Marine Park, Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles and 2)<br />

estimating the recreational benefits derived by those divers using the Park. The findings<br />

indicate the previous US$10 annual diver user fee could be increased substantially<br />

without an adverse effect on island tourism. The increased revenue generated from this<br />

sustainable financing mechanism would be more than sufficient to fund both current and<br />

enhanced marine park operations. In addition, the study finds that maintaining a highquality<br />

diving experience within the Park is worth between US$56 and US$132 per diver<br />

per year. Assuming that effective Park management is preventing adverse environmental<br />

change, this information can be used in a benefit-cost analysis to clearly demonstrate the<br />

positive net benefits associated with a well-functioning Bonaire Marine Park. The<br />

findings of this study are indicative of values that may exist for other coral reef MPAs<br />

with significant tourism appeal, and illustrate how low-cost social science methods can<br />

augment existing MPA research plans.<br />

Poster Mini-Symposium 23: Reef Management<br />

23.973<br />

Valuation Of Coastal Ecosystem Goods And Services in East-Central, Florida<br />

Brian KELLY* 1<br />

1 Dept. of Marine and Environmental Systems, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL<br />

Detailed analyses of market and particularly nonmarket values of ecosystem goods and services<br />

are either absent or limited for most of Florida’s 35 coastal counties. This study assesses the<br />

value of coastal ecosystem goods and services in Brevard County, Florida. Brevard possesses<br />

one of the longest shorelines in Florida with major fishing and surfing economies, some<br />

associated with substantial nearshore reefs. Specific objectives include: 1) to build component<br />

value estimates for selected coastal ecosystem goods and services in Brevard County, 2) to<br />

provide a total economic value estimate of Brevard’s coastal ecosystem goods and services, and<br />

3) to identify economic and ecosystem costs from unsustainable coastal development.<br />

Economic data was gathered through an extensive literature search and from local and regional<br />

businesses and trade organizations. The primary valuation methodology deployed in the study<br />

was the value transfer technique. Preliminary results reveal that Brevard County’s saltwater<br />

recreational fishing alone produces an annual market value of at least $150 million dollars and a<br />

nonmarket value of approximately $100 million. Initial estimates also show that the economic<br />

impact of surfing in the county is well over a half billion dollars per year. A substantial<br />

component of these values is associated with reef systems. These and related findings suggest<br />

that the many ecosystem goods and services provided by Florida’s unique coastal habitats are<br />

undervalued and under-deployed in management arenas. Policy-makers are either unaware of<br />

or not using the non-market ecosystem service valuation methodologies available when<br />

developing critical decisions about coastal resource use, particularly given the major challenges<br />

that sea level rise poses for sustainable economic and environmental planning.<br />

23.974<br />

The Antiquities Act And The Protection Of Coral Reefs in United States Waters<br />

Frank ALCOCK* 1,2 , Robert JOHNSON 1<br />

1 Division of Social Sciences, New College of Florida, Sarasota, FL, 2 Marine Policy Institute,<br />

Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota<br />

This paper explores the recent utilization of the Antiquities Act of 1906 as a management tool<br />

for the protection of coral reefs. An initial section assesses the current status of coral reef<br />

ecosystems under U.S. jurisdiction. A second section provides a historical overview of some of<br />

the legislative tools that have been used to protect coral reefs in the United States, most notably<br />

the National Marine Sanctuaries Act. A third section provides a historical overview of the<br />

Antiquities Act and its use by various administrations, noting that the Clinton Administration<br />

was the first to use the Act as a management tool for coral reefs when he used it to established<br />

the Virgin Islands Coral Reef National Monument in 2000. The Bush Administration<br />

subsequently used the Act to establish the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands National Monument<br />

in 2006 and additional designations are being contemplated for 2008. A fourth section discusses<br />

the legal and political implications of designating coral reefs as national sanctuaries vs. national<br />

monuments with a focus on the potential application of the Antiquities Act to the Gulf of<br />

Mexico region. The paper ultimately argues that the substantive impact of the Act depends<br />

largely upon (1) the specific terms outlined in specific executive orders that vary and are subject<br />

to executive discretion; and (2) enforcement of those terms. Executive discretion can engender<br />

stronger protections and expedite the process of enacting those protections but it also runs the<br />

risk of alienating some stakeholder groups to the point that enforcement becomes problematic.<br />

Carefully used, the Antiquities Act holds considerable potential to strengthen coral reef<br />

management in United States waters.<br />

517

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!