11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University 11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

24.12.2012 Views

23.897 Empowering Fisherwomen Through Ict in Reef Conservation And Management – A Case Study From Tuticorin Coast Of The Gulf Of Mannar, Southeastern India Jamila PATTERSON 1 , Eva LINDEN 2 , Christin BIERBRIER 2 , Dan WILHELMSSON 3 , Inger LOFGREN 4 , David OBURA 5 , Edward JK PATTERSON* 1 1 2 Suganthi Devadason Marine Research Institute, Tuticorin, India, Nyköpings Folkhögskola, Nyköping, Sweden, 3 Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, 4 Lagman Linds v. 4 A, Stocksund, Sweden, 5 CORDIO East Africa, Mombasa, Kenya To reduce pressure on coral reef resources and economic vulnerability of coastal communities, local fisherwomen Self Help Groups (SHGs) were empowered through provision of Information and Communication Technologies ICT and adult education in 5 coastal villages in Tuticorin district of the Gulf of Mannar (GoM) in the South-eastern India. Improved literacy levels, environmental education, as well as the provision of computer training and equipment, improved villages capacity for taking up alternative livelihoods and enhance their living conditions. The support to SHGs have been successful in demonstrating the potential as a non-threatening mechanism for mobilizing resources, providing affordable finance and social benefits to poorer fisher women, including self-reliance, awareness creation, capacity development, social solidarity and the empowerment of women. The village coordinators from the five targeted villages were given training in adult and environmental education and computer applications. After the training, each village was provided with ICT components (include computer, printer, mobile phone, and internet). Several people, including school children are taking part in the adult and environmental education; and computer training. The villagers are showing keen interest and many old fisher women now taught to put their signature and also started reading. In addition, the SHG members in the targeted villages are also trained in other alternative livelihood activities such as vermi-compositing and hygienic fish drying methods. Now, they started enjoying the benefits from their livelihood activities. The creation of awareness about the environment along with the adult education, training in computer applications and other livelihood options helped the fisherwomen to earn additional income for their families, which is the key to reduce the destructive fishing practices and enhance living conditions in the coastal areas of GoM.. 23.898 Habitat Similarity Between The Artificial Reef And Surrounding Natural Hardbottom Of Broward County, Fl: Implications For Future Mitigation Planning Stacy PREKEL* 1 1 Marine Science and Biological Research, Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc., Boca Raton, FL Abstract: In order to mitigate for anticipated burial of natural hardbottom areas from Segment III of the Broward County Shore Protection Project, 3.6 x 10-2 km2 (8.9 acres) of artificial reef were built in August/September 2003. To determine if the artificial reef was approaching community equivalence to the surrounding nearshore natural hardbottom, benthic biological monitoring was conducted at five discrete monitoring events. Twenty-seven, 30-meter transects were monitored on the artificial reef and 26, 30-meter transects were monitored on the natural hardbottom. Biological monitoring utilized the Benthic Ecological Assessment of Marginal Reefs (BEAMR) methodology. Non-parametric multivariate analyses were applied to the functional group dataset using PRIMER-E® (v6) to detect site type similarity. A Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) ordination was generated with associated one-way Analysis of Similarity (ANOSIM) from the transect-level data to present the differences between the functional group-level benthic communities of the artificial and natural substrate at each monitoring event. Results revealed significant differences (p

23.901 Reef Monitoring Project For Kaho‘olawe Island Reserve, Hawai‘i Frank G. STANTON* 1 1 Marine Option Program, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI The coral reefs of Kaho‘olawe have been monitored sporadically since 1969 with no long-term management focus until recently. In 1994 the island and surrounding waters were set aside as a reserve for cultural and traditional activities by native Hawaiians and to restore the land and waters of the island. Five coastline access locations were designated for human activities, and a program was established in 2004 to monitor these sites and five control sites as part of a marine resource management plan. Monitoring originally included benthic cover and fish numbers but has expanded to include coral bleaching and disease monitoring. Overall, the reefs are in relatively good shape and considered among the best in the Main Hawaiian Islands. Noticeable decreases in some fish species have occurred at all sites and cannot be directly attributed to human activities at the five access sites. Coral bleaching occurs annually during the summer, but there has been no large-scale coral mortality from bleaching. Coral disease monitoring is still in a descriptive phase and has identified only low levels of incidence to date. The coral reefs of Kaho‘olawe must be managed as part of an island ecosystem because most of the impacts are related to natural and anthropogenic sources on land. Incorporating a coral reef management plan early in the management process has accomplished several things: 1) It has measured prior conditions before impacts occur at selected sites. 2) It has identified broader scale impacts that may not be directly related to coastal activities. 3) It has drawn attention to the need to integrate reef management with land management. 4) It has created a baseline of reef conditions that can be used when planning for other marine related activities such as fish farming or energy generation. 23.902 Environment Impact Assessment: Effective to Protect Okinawa's Coral Reefs at Risk? Seiji NAKAYA* 1 1 Research Institute for Subtropics, Okinawa, Japan Since its reversion to Japan in 1972, Okinawa has experienced drastic improvement of infrastructure, including construction of harbor, fishing port and seawalls, reclamation of coral reefs for industrial, business and residential sites, as well as terrestrial civil works for farmlands, roads, dams, and river embankment. As these often degrade coral reef ecosystems, the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) was introduced to conserve environmental values. This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of EIA in terms of conservation of coral reefs in Okinawa Island. I reviewed existing documents regarding major construction projects that are under planning, EIA or construction on or near coral reefs. On-going projects include: (1) Reclamation of Awase wetlands for multipurpose ground, (2) Construction of 6 US Marine Helipads in a rain forest where endangered endemic species inhabit, (3) Reclamation for a US Marine air base, (4) Seaward extension of a commercial airport that shares the runway with Japan Air Self-Defense Force, (5) Extension of Naha Port including relocation of US Army Port on the precise natural shoreline. While EIA helped the public be involved in decision making process, EIA in Okinawa possesses flaws in the process as follows. (a) As EIA is conducted after details are determined, no comparison of environmental impacts among alternate plans, including a zero option, or major revisions of the plan can be made. (b) Information is open to the public in a late stage of the process. (c) Legitimate EIA is often exempted for unclear reasons. (d) Information on military issues is not provided. Findings strongly suggest that public be allowed to participate in an early stage of planning, that information be accessible more freely, and that strategic EIA be introduced, especially for large-scale projects, if EIA is to be effective for conservation of coral reefs and related ecosystems. Poster Mini-Symposium 23: Reef Management 23.903 Spatial Diversity Of Coral Reef Communities in Sulu Sea Marine Corridors Wilfredo Roehl LICUANAN* 1 , Katrina LUZON 2 , Porfirio ALINO 2 1 Biology Department and Shields Marine Station, De La Salle University-Manila, Manila, Philippines, 2 Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines Most protected coral reefs and coral communities in the Philippines are in small fishery reserves chosen for their coral cover and fish biomass, rather than their biodiversity conservation value. In an effort to improve criteria for designing these small reserves, spatial arrangement, particularly patch sizes of the reef benthos, was examined using semivariograms computed from DCA ordination scores of raw data. The data were generated from reef photos taken at one meter intervals along 100m transect lines, deployed along depth contours at 27 reef sites in three locations in the Sulu Sea. These locations are along the Cagayan Ridge (including Cagayancillo, and the Tubattaha National Marine Park), and reefs in Balabac Islands, southern Palawan that lie in a strait connecting the Sulu Sea with the South China Sea. Three basic community types were discerned - Type 1 communities are made up mostly by sand, rubble, and macroalgae as typically encountered in reef flats and backreef areas; Type 2 communities are a mix of different forms of various coral genera (except Acropora); and Type 3 communities are made up mostly of Acropora, either in tabulate or branching form. These community types are typically seen as mosaics but their relative proportions vary with depth and exposure to monsoon winds, and appear to indicate disturbance history of a site. Type 1 and Type 3 communities are typically large patches, with the latter at shallow sites, and the former at deep or sheltered ones. Community mosaics dominated by both types have low diversity but the latter also has the highest coral cover. Type 2 communities, on the other hand, have small mosaic patches and steep species area curves. These are typically found at intermediate depths. 23.904 Conceptualizing Fisher-Tourism Conflict in An Indonesian Mpa Leila SIEVANEN* 1 1 Environmental Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA Bunaken National Marine Park, as an internationally recognized example of successful integration of economic growth (through ecotourism) and biodiversity conservation, has experienced a steady increase in foreign and domestic dive tourists over the past ten years. In marine protected areas (MPAs) funded by ecotourism, arguably the most common type of social conflict results from competition between fishers and tourists. Unresolved fisher-tourism conflict in MPAs is often directly related to management failure. To resolve the resulting conflict over space for livelihood and tourism needs in Bunaken, Park officials have implemented a co-management approach in which fishers and tourism operators participate in establishing exclusive zones separating fishing and diving activities. Many scholars view competition over scarce coral reef resources as a major source of increasing social conflict in coastal Southeast Asia. In this view, conflict resolution can be achieved through fishers and divers jointly deciding where their respective activities can occur. Based on eighteen months of ethnographic fieldwork in Bunaken National Marine Park, I contrast two views of fisher-tourism conflict. Is this conflict better viewed as a conflict over scarce resources or a social conflict over access to natural resources? I argue that viewing conflict in MPAs as driven mainly by resource limitation omits the greater social and political context in which an MPA operates. My research showed that on–the-ground operation of the MPA favors non-consumptive over consumptive uses and implicitly favored dive interests over fishing interests. Understanding the social conflicts associated with the implementation of these assumptions in an MPA is key to successful management. 500

23.901<br />

Reef Monitoring Project For Kaho‘olawe Island Reserve, Hawai‘i<br />

Frank G. STANTON* 1<br />

1 Marine Option Program, <strong>University</strong> of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI<br />

The coral reefs of Kaho‘olawe have been monitored sporadically since 1969 with no<br />

long-term management focus until recently. In 1994 the island and surrounding waters<br />

were set aside as a reserve for cultural and traditional activities by native Hawaiians and<br />

to restore the land and waters of the island. Five coastline access locations were<br />

designated for human activities, and a program was established in 2004 to monitor these<br />

sites and five control sites as part of a marine resource management plan. Monitoring<br />

originally included benthic cover and fish numbers but has expanded to include coral<br />

bleaching and disease monitoring. Overall, the reefs are in relatively good shape and<br />

considered among the best in the Main Hawaiian Islands. Noticeable decreases in some<br />

fish species have occurred at all sites and cannot be directly attributed to human activities<br />

at the five access sites. Coral bleaching occurs annually during the summer, but there has<br />

been no large-scale coral mortality from bleaching. Coral disease monitoring is still in a<br />

descriptive phase and has identified only low levels of incidence to date. The coral reefs<br />

of Kaho‘olawe must be managed as part of an island ecosystem because most of the<br />

impacts are related to natural and anthropogenic sources on land. Incorporating a coral<br />

reef management plan early in the management process has accomplished several things:<br />

1) It has measured prior conditions before impacts occur at selected sites. 2) It has<br />

identified broader scale impacts that may not be directly related to coastal activities. 3) It<br />

has drawn attention to the need to integrate reef management with land management. 4)<br />

It has created a baseline of reef conditions that can be used when planning for other<br />

marine related activities such as fish farming or energy generation.<br />

23.902<br />

Environment Impact Assessment: Effective to Protect Okinawa's Coral Reefs at<br />

Risk?<br />

Seiji NAKAYA* 1<br />

1 Research Institute for Subtropics, Okinawa, Japan<br />

Since its reversion to Japan in 1972, Okinawa has experienced drastic improvement of<br />

infrastructure, including construction of harbor, fishing port and seawalls, reclamation of<br />

coral reefs for industrial, business and residential sites, as well as terrestrial civil works<br />

for farmlands, roads, dams, and river embankment. As these often degrade coral reef<br />

ecosystems, the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) was introduced to conserve<br />

environmental values. This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of EIA in terms of<br />

conservation of coral reefs in Okinawa Island.<br />

I reviewed existing documents regarding major construction projects that are under<br />

planning, EIA or construction on or near coral reefs.<br />

On-going projects include: (1) Reclamation of Awase wetlands for multipurpose ground,<br />

(2) Construction of 6 US Marine Helipads in a rain forest where endangered endemic<br />

species inhabit, (3) Reclamation for a US Marine air base, (4) Seaward extension of a<br />

commercial airport that shares the runway with Japan Air Self-Defense Force, (5)<br />

Extension of Naha Port including relocation of US Army Port on the precise natural<br />

shoreline. While EIA helped the public be involved in decision making process, EIA in<br />

Okinawa possesses flaws in the process as follows. (a) As EIA is conducted after details<br />

are determined, no comparison of environmental impacts among alternate plans,<br />

including a zero option, or major revisions of the plan can be made. (b) Information is<br />

open to the public in a late stage of the process. (c) Legitimate EIA is often exempted for<br />

unclear reasons. (d) Information on military issues is not provided.<br />

Findings strongly suggest that public be allowed to participate in an early stage of<br />

planning, that information be accessible more freely, and that strategic EIA be<br />

introduced, especially for large-scale projects, if EIA is to be effective for conservation of<br />

coral reefs and related ecosystems.<br />

Poster Mini-Symposium 23: Reef Management<br />

23.903<br />

Spatial Diversity Of Coral Reef Communities in Sulu Sea Marine Corridors<br />

Wilfredo Roehl LICUANAN* 1 , Katrina LUZON 2 , Porfirio ALINO 2<br />

1 Biology Department and Shields Marine Station, De La Salle <strong>University</strong>-Manila, Manila,<br />

Philippines, 2 Marine Science Institute, <strong>University</strong> of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City,<br />

Philippines<br />

Most protected coral reefs and coral communities in the Philippines are in small fishery reserves<br />

chosen for their coral cover and fish biomass, rather than their biodiversity conservation value.<br />

In an effort to improve criteria for designing these small reserves, spatial arrangement,<br />

particularly patch sizes of the reef benthos, was examined using semivariograms computed<br />

from DCA ordination scores of raw data. The data were generated from reef photos taken at<br />

one meter intervals along 100m transect lines, deployed along depth contours at 27 reef sites in<br />

three locations in the Sulu Sea. These locations are along the Cagayan Ridge (including<br />

Cagayancillo, and the Tubattaha National Marine Park), and reefs in Balabac Islands, southern<br />

Palawan that lie in a strait connecting the Sulu Sea with the South China Sea. Three basic<br />

community types were discerned - Type 1 communities are made up mostly by sand, rubble,<br />

and macroalgae as typically encountered in reef flats and backreef areas; Type 2 communities<br />

are a mix of different forms of various coral genera (except Acropora); and Type 3 communities<br />

are made up mostly of Acropora, either in tabulate or branching form. These community types<br />

are typically seen as mosaics but their relative proportions vary with depth and exposure to<br />

monsoon winds, and appear to indicate disturbance history of a site. Type 1 and Type 3<br />

communities are typically large patches, with the latter at shallow sites, and the former at deep<br />

or sheltered ones. Community mosaics dominated by both types have low diversity but the<br />

latter also has the highest coral cover. Type 2 communities, on the other hand, have small<br />

mosaic patches and steep species area curves. These are typically found at intermediate depths.<br />

23.904<br />

Conceptualizing Fisher-Tourism Conflict in An Indonesian Mpa<br />

Leila SIEVANEN* 1<br />

1 Environmental Anthropology, <strong>University</strong> of Washington, Seattle, WA<br />

Bunaken National Marine Park, as an internationally recognized example of successful<br />

integration of economic growth (through ecotourism) and biodiversity conservation, has<br />

experienced a steady increase in foreign and domestic dive tourists over the past ten years. In<br />

marine protected areas (MPAs) funded by ecotourism, arguably the most common type of social<br />

conflict results from competition between fishers and tourists. Unresolved fisher-tourism<br />

conflict in MPAs is often directly related to management failure. To resolve the resulting<br />

conflict over space for livelihood and tourism needs in Bunaken, Park officials have<br />

implemented a co-management approach in which fishers and tourism operators participate in<br />

establishing exclusive zones separating fishing and diving activities.<br />

Many scholars view competition over scarce coral reef resources as a major source of<br />

increasing social conflict in coastal Southeast Asia. In this view, conflict resolution can be<br />

achieved through fishers and divers jointly deciding where their respective activities can occur.<br />

Based on eighteen months of ethnographic fieldwork in Bunaken National Marine Park, I<br />

contrast two views of fisher-tourism conflict. Is this conflict better viewed as a conflict over<br />

scarce resources or a social conflict over access to natural resources? I argue that viewing<br />

conflict in MPAs as driven mainly by resource limitation omits the greater social and political<br />

context in which an MPA operates. My research showed that on–the-ground operation of the<br />

MPA favors non-consumptive over consumptive uses and implicitly favored dive interests over<br />

fishing interests. Understanding the social conflicts associated with the implementation of these<br />

assumptions in an MPA is key to successful management.<br />

500

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!