24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

23.889<br />

The Economic Value Of Coral Reef Quality To Scuba Divers in Barbados<br />

Peter SCHUHMANN* 1 , James CASEY 2 , Hazel OXENFORD 3<br />

1 Economics and Finance, <strong>University</strong> of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC,<br />

2 Economics, Washington and Lee <strong>University</strong>, Lexington, VA, 3 CERMES, <strong>University</strong> of<br />

the West Indies Cave Hill, St. Michael, Barbados<br />

The objective of this research is to estimate the economic value of coral reef quality as it<br />

relates to SCUBA diving. This value is derived using a stated preference (choice<br />

modeling) survey of resident and tourist divers in Barbados conducted in 2007. In<br />

addition to a variety of demographic variables, divers were asked about their level of<br />

experience, expenditures related to travel and diving, and encounters with specific<br />

species. Divers also completed a choice experiment, selecting between alternative dives<br />

with varying characteristics including price, crowding, fish diversity, encounters with<br />

marine turtles and coral reef quality. Coral reef quality was represented via a series of<br />

photographs representing a known range of live coral cover. Hence, a quantifiable<br />

measure of coral cover is presented in a qualitative fashion that divers can understand.<br />

Results indicate that willingness to pay for increased coral quality and other quality<br />

variables vary with diver experience, nationality and the quality of their most recent dive.<br />

The results of this study can be used to inform management decisions regarding reef use<br />

and can aid in the development of policies aimed at maximizing the returns from diving<br />

while reducing the negative impacts of tourism activities.<br />

23.890<br />

Pacific Islands Climate Change Portal<br />

Mary Lou CUMBERPATCH 1 , Marjorie ERNST 1 , Stephanie FAUVER 2 , Carrie HALL 1 ,<br />

Sarah VAN DER SCHALIE 1 , Linda PIKULA* 3<br />

1 NOAA, Silver Spring, MD, 2 NOAA, Charleston, SC, 3 NOAA Miami Regional Library<br />

@ AOML, Miami, FL<br />

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has begun developing a<br />

Pacific Islands Climate Change Portal that will enable Pacific Island coastal managers to<br />

efficiently incorporate climate information and tools into their decision making.<br />

Climate related resources relevant to coastal managers from various organizations<br />

currently exist, but they are scattered in many different locations—making access<br />

difficult and time consuming. To improve access to climate resources in the Pacific,<br />

NOAA is partnering with the Pacific Region Environment Programme (SPREP) and<br />

other organizations in the development of a portal that will be integrated with existing<br />

climate change decision support efforts in the region. The Portal is expected to be<br />

released in October of 2008.<br />

The backbone of the Portal will consist of a searchable virtual library that provides links<br />

to science-based information and tools on specific subject areas such as sea level rise,<br />

water resources, and ocean acidification. The Portal will highlight suitable decision<br />

support tools, case studies, information on regional initiatives, climate services, training<br />

and education, and include links to data sources and partnership opportunities.<br />

In the poster session, we will present an overview of the Portal and solicit feedback<br />

regarding portal resources, both existing or under development, intended to support coral<br />

reef management in the region in the context of climate change. NOAA will use the<br />

feedback provided by participants to further refine the content of the Portal.<br />

Poster Mini-Symposium 23: Reef Management<br />

23.891<br />

A Comparison of Coral Reef Management Strategies for Tourism in the Gulf of Thailand<br />

Makamas SUTTHACHEEP* 1 , Thamasak YEEMIN 1<br />

1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ramkhamhaeng <strong>University</strong>, Bangkok, Thailand<br />

Effective coral reef management can increase key ecosystem parameters such as fish biomass<br />

and diversity or live coral cover and maintain ecosystem processes and function. The objective<br />

of this paper is to compare management effectiveness of two popular diving sites, i.e., Mu Koh<br />

Chang and Koh Tao Group, in the Gulf of Thailand. Mu Koh Chang is relatively a new tourism<br />

destination in eastern part of the Gulf of Thailand. There are over 50 Islands in the area which<br />

harbor approximately 16 km2 of coral reefs. It was declared as a special administrative zone for<br />

sustainable tourism development through the Designated Area for Sustainable Tourism<br />

Administration (Public Organization) in 2002. An estimated 30% of the coral reefs are within<br />

the jurisdiction of Mu Koh Chang National Park which was established in 1982. Moreover Mu<br />

Koh Chang was selected as one of the coral reef demonstration sites under the UNEP/GEF<br />

Project on Reversing Environmental Degradation Trends in the South China Sea and Gulf of<br />

Thailand. Collaboration between relevant agencies is the key factor for management<br />

effectiveness of coral reef based tourism. Koh Tao Group is one of the most popular diving sites<br />

in the South of Thailand for decades. The coral reef area around the islands is about 2 km2. The<br />

main landholder of Koh Tao Group is Treasury Department of Ministry of Finance. Some<br />

private companies leased the land for resort and diving business. There are no obvious national<br />

measures and policies to manage coral reefs of Koh Tao Group but cooperation of the Local<br />

Administrative Office, diving shops and volunteer groups play a major role for coral reef<br />

management. Consideration of socioeconomic factors and collaboration of stakeholders are<br />

very essential to improve management effectiveness of coral reefs in the Gulf of Thailand.<br />

23.892<br />

Coral Reef Fish Community Metrics As Indicators Of Management Success<br />

Chris CALDOW* 1 , Randy CLARK 2 , Alan FRIEDLANDER 3 , Mark MONACO 2 , Ben<br />

RUTTENBERG 4<br />

1 Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment, NOAA, Silver Spring, MD, 2 NOAA, Silver<br />

Spring, MD, 3 Oceanic Institute, Waimanalo, HI, 4 <strong>University</strong> of California, San Diego, La Jolla,<br />

CA<br />

With substantial impacts on coral reef ecosystems world wide, evaluating and communicating<br />

the efficacy of successful management strategies is imperative to maintain and restore<br />

community structure and ecosystem function. Measuring the degree of success and making<br />

comparisons across regions however is often hindered by a variety of factors including:<br />

differences in the ecosystem being managed and the management strategy, differences in data<br />

utilized to evaluate the strategy, and differences in the types and amounts of pressures facing<br />

the ecosystems. Recent studies have focused on the use of coral reef fish biomass as an<br />

informative indicator regarding ecosystem health and therefore management success. We<br />

evaluate a series of community metrics with our own census data collected utilizing a consistent<br />

sampling design and in-situ methodologies to survey coral reef fish populations in both<br />

relatively pristine and more heavily impacted ecosystems in the Pacific and Atlantic regions.<br />

Our findings suggest that community metrics such as species richness and abundance allow us<br />

to make distinctions between populations even over relatively small scales (neighboring<br />

islands); however, certain metrics such as high overall fish biomass and proportionally high<br />

biomass of species in higher trophic levels tend to provide the most significant contrast between<br />

relatively pristine areas and those subject to greater levels of threats and stresses. Having a<br />

robust yet simple indicator of ecosystem health such as biomass enables quantification of<br />

management success. In addition, the existence of a relatively unperturbed control site within a<br />

given ecoregion can provide quantifiable information on the characteristics of a healthy<br />

ecosystem and therefore provide a reference for comparison among sites within that ecoregion.<br />

497

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!