24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

23.1014<br />

Second And Third Order Management Issues in South Sinai Protected Reef Areas<br />

Rupert ORMOND* 1 , Wera LEUJAK 2 , Mohammed SALEM 3 , Ayman MABROUK 3<br />

1 SaveourSeas Foundation, West Lothian, United Kingdom, 2 <strong>University</strong> Marine Biological<br />

Station Millport, <strong>University</strong> of London, Isle of Cumbrae, United Kingdom, 3 South Sinai<br />

Protectorates, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency, Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt<br />

Over the last 15 years the whole of the Egyptian coast of the Gulf of Aqaba has been<br />

incorporated within a series of Marine Protected Areas. The relevant authorities<br />

(Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency) have effectively implemented a series of first<br />

order management objectives. However the region has been promoted so successfully<br />

that some reef areas are now subject to a greater intensity of visitor use than any others<br />

worldwide.<br />

Quantitative studies have elucidated a series of second order management issues:<br />

i. The most popular reef sites are being so heavily used that, through incidental trampling<br />

and breakage, coral cover has declined, and at some sites the reef assemblage been<br />

changed.<br />

ii. Largely as a consequence of this impact, and Crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks, coral<br />

cover now appears to be in decline across the region.<br />

iii. Public awareness initiatives have increased the care that visitors from traditional<br />

tourist source countries take to avoid coral damage, but there has been a recent large<br />

increase in the proportion of other tourists with little knowledge of or concern for marine<br />

life.<br />

iv. With even larger numbers of developments and visitors, infringements of MPA<br />

regulations are becoming increasingly evident.<br />

In response, the EEAA has supported research addressing a number of key third order<br />

issues:<br />

a) What are the carrying capacities of different types of reef area? Data suggest that<br />

ecological carrying capacities may not be clearly defined, while at heavily used sites<br />

social carrying capacity may be the more important issue.<br />

b) How can the behaviour of visitors with little concern for coral protection be more<br />

effectively controlled? Sanctions against tour operators and tour group leaders may be as<br />

important as positive publicity campaigns.<br />

c) How effectively can the tools of integrated coastal zone management be applied to<br />

mange visitor behaviour as well as tourist development?<br />

23.1015<br />

Community Participation in Coral Reef Management On Phuket Island, Thailand<br />

Pitul PANCHAIYAPHUM 1 , Hansa CHANSANG* 2 , Krawi ONGSORANACOMKUL 3 ,<br />

Anuwat NATEEWATTANA 4<br />

1 Department of Marine and Coastal resources, Phuket, Thailand, 2 Phuket Marine<br />

Biological Center, Phuket, Thailand, 3 Department of Fisheries, Phuket, Thailand,<br />

4 Department of Marine and Coastal Resources, Bangkok, Thailand<br />

In Thailand a pilot project in community participation in managing reefs of Phuket Island<br />

has been initiated since 1992. The communities along the west coast have been benefit<br />

from tourism by changing their occupation from coastal fisheries to tourism related<br />

occupation. They were encouraged in setting up associations which participated in<br />

various activities i.e., installation and maintenance of mooring buoys and assisting<br />

authorities in surveillance of illegal activities. The network of associations has been<br />

formed to exchange information and experiences among various groups. Increasingly the<br />

network began to settle the conflicting issues of reef resources among themselves. Parts<br />

of the activities were also supported by local government and private sectors. At present,<br />

the communities still depend upon supports from authorities in various ways i.e. some<br />

financial and logistic supports, and information regarding successful management<br />

elsewhere.<br />

In conclusion it is shown that transferring management responsibility of reef resources to<br />

local communities is possible but it is a long term process. Close cooperation between<br />

government officials and communities is the key of success.<br />

Poster Mini-Symposium 23: Reef Management<br />

23.1016<br />

Improving Governance Of Marine Protected Areas Through Inter-Local Government<br />

Collaboration in Central Philippines<br />

Rizaller AMOLO* 1 , Rose-Liza EISMA-OSORIO 2<br />

1 Local Governance for Coastal Management Project, Coastal Conservation and Education<br />

Foundation Inc., Cebu City, Philippines, 2 Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation Inc.,<br />

Cebu City, Philippines<br />

Establishment of no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) in the Philippines has become an<br />

efficient approach to address coral reef degradation and decline in reef fishery production by<br />

numerous local governments. In Central Visayas, Philippines, over 400 MPAs both declared by<br />

local ordinances and through the National Integrated Protected Areas System Act were<br />

established to improve marine habitats and increase fishery resources. However, only 20-25%<br />

has been effectively managed by local government units (LGUs) along with their constituents.<br />

Achieving its objectives, there is a need for LGUs to collaborate strategies to improve MPA<br />

management and maximize benefits. This paper examines the effect of collaboration of the<br />

LGUs in Southern Cebu and Siquijor province, in improving reef management by looking into<br />

various outcomes of effective governance. A 3-year biophysical monitoring of MPAs showed<br />

significant changes in benthic community and reef fish population. MPA governance rating has<br />

improved overtime. Effective coastal law enforcement within and outside MPAs has increased.<br />

Various strategies such as collecting user fee, joint enforcement effort, and effective community<br />

education and information dissemination were found to also be an emerging approach to<br />

increase support in management. Lesson learned in inter-local government collaboration<br />

includes: clarify organizational requirement prior to effective program implementation and<br />

effective joint law enforcement plays a crucial role to sustain collaborative support.<br />

23.1017<br />

Recreational Diving Management in the Coral Reefs of Cozumel, Mexico<br />

Luis SANTANDER* 1<br />

1 Division de Desarrollo Sustentable, Universidad de Quintana Roo, Cozumel, Mexico<br />

The general objective is twofold: i) a review of the management principles and actions aimed to<br />

reduce the negative impacts of recreational diving in coral reefs; and, ii) point out the<br />

shortcomings of such principles and actions in Cozumel’s MPA (Marine Protected Area).<br />

The paper has a presentation and discussion of two principles and strategies for MPA: zoning<br />

and carrying capacity. The study includes a selection of other specific measures and actions<br />

designed to reduce the environmental impacts of recreational diving and it also deals with the<br />

characteristics and tendencies of the industry of recreational diving.<br />

After the analysis of the international experiences in the management of recreational diving in<br />

coral reefs in MPA, the analysis is centered in Cozumel’s MPA, mainly with data obtained from<br />

monitoring over 350 divers and 82 diving groups.<br />

The quantitative results of physical contacts and sediment removals due to divers is explained in<br />

relation to behaviours and omissions of instructors and diving guides that fall beyond the scope<br />

of principles, policies and actions contained by management plans for recreational diving.<br />

The main conclusion is that general management principles of MPA are usefull and important<br />

but have shortcomings. For example, i) carrying capacity (number of divers) can change<br />

drastically with different divers’ profile and diving practices, or ii) restrictions in a zone not<br />

necessarily mean that the consequences of negative impacts in a nearby area of intensive use,<br />

are absent on the former. When it comes to standard actions to protect reefs from divers the<br />

main limitations come from the great diversity of physical and biological features of sites and<br />

from the different behaviours of divers.<br />

490

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!