11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
18.678<br />
Mapping Bottom Features Of The Site Selected For The Underwater Observatory<br />
in Sharm El Sheikh (South Sinai, Egypt)<br />
Stefano ACUNTO 1 , Jessika GIRALDI* 1 , David BALATA 1 , Luigi PIAZZI 1 , Francesco<br />
CINELLI 1<br />
1 <strong>University</strong> of Pisa, Pisa, Italy<br />
A bionomic and topographic map of the site selected for construction of the Underwater<br />
Observatory was made as part of the building plan of the structure.<br />
The study area was located at Marsa Ghoslani bay in front of the Visitor Center of the<br />
Ras Mohammed National Park (Sharm el Sheikh). This area is characterised by a small<br />
fringing reef that, at the depth of ~ 5 meters, reaches a gentle slope rocky bottom covered<br />
with sand and scattered coral assemblages.<br />
Underwater visual, photographic and video surveys were made along 6m wide x 50m<br />
long belt transects (n=15) perpendicular to the coastline. Visual recording of bottom<br />
features included type of substratum (rock, sand and rubble) and type of organisms (hard<br />
coral, soft coral). Bathymetric data were obtained measuring depth at each metre along<br />
the line. A bionomic and topographic site map obtained from the analysed date (scale<br />
1:100) was used to select the building site for the Observatory. The area was mainly bare<br />
rock and therefore, direct impact on benthic organisms resulting from construction was<br />
minimised.<br />
18.679<br />
Differentiating Among Global And Local Stressors in Florida Keys (Usa) Coral<br />
Reefs Using Coral Regeneration Rates And A Cellular Diagnostic System<br />
Elizabeth FISHER-MOSES* 1 , Cheryl WOODLEY 2 , John FAUTH 3 , Pamela<br />
HALLOCK 4<br />
1 Eckerd College, Saint Petersburg, FL, 2 NOAA National Ocean Service, Hollings Marine<br />
Laboratory, Charleston, SC, 3 Department of Biology, <strong>University</strong> of Central Florida,<br />
Orlando, FL, 4 College of Marine Science, <strong>University</strong> of South Florida, Saint Petersburg,<br />
FL<br />
Coral reefs are threatened resources in Florida and worldwide, and reef declines are<br />
attributed to an array of local, regional and global stressors. Successful management of<br />
stressed reefs requires multiple indicators that permit rapid identification and diagnosis of<br />
causative agents. We used data acquired from coral regeneration rates, a cellular<br />
diagnostic system and public environmental data to differentiate between local (e.g.,<br />
pollutants) and global (e.g., temperature) stressors. We applied this multi-scale approach<br />
at one patch reef in Biscayne National Park (BNP) and four patch reefs in the upper<br />
Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary between 2001 and 2003. Sites were chosen in<br />
consultation with resource managers to reflect a spectrum of possible anthropogenic<br />
influences based on distance from urbanized coasts. Key Largo (KL) 6 m and BNP are<br />
located along heavily developed coastline while White Banks and Algae Reef were<br />
adjacent to an intact mangrove shoreline associated with John Pennekamp Coral Reef<br />
State Park. No evidence for temperature or light stress was observed during our study.<br />
Cellular diagnostic analyses indicated that local stressors, specifically xenobiotics,<br />
affected corals at our study sites (particularly Key Largo 6 m and BNP), with the highest<br />
stress levels during winter storms and following heavy rainfall. In addition to elevated<br />
cellular diagnostic markers, coral colonies at KL 6 m and BNP were clearly stressed as<br />
evidenced by highly variable and overall low lesion regeneration rates. Other reef sites<br />
experienced relatively favorable conditions as evidenced by consistently high lesion<br />
regeneration rates and a high percentage of healed lesions. Further studies are needed to<br />
determine what xenobiotics are affecting these corals. Our study emphasized the<br />
importance of using a hierarchical, mechanistic approach to assess reef condition. Using<br />
this approach provides resource managers with information linking coral ecosystem<br />
decline with environmental conditions.<br />
Poster Mini-Symposium 18: Reef Status and Trends<br />
18.680<br />
Coral Cover Evaluation Of Todos Os Santos Bay Reefs After The 2003 Mass Bleaching<br />
Event in Southwestern Atlantic<br />
Igor CRUZ* 1 , Amanda NASCIMENTO 1 , Camila BRASIL 2 , Ruy KIKUCHI 3 , Zelinda LEAO 3<br />
1 Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil, 2 Instituto de<br />
Geociências, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil, 3 Centro de Pesquisas em<br />
Geofísica e Geologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil<br />
Aiming to investigate the consequences of a mass coral bleaching event observed in Todos os<br />
Santos Bay in 2003, reefs were re-surveyed in 2007. The 2003 bleaching event affected<br />
37.6±25.5% coral cover, when sea surface temperature (SST) reached yearly maximum<br />
anomaly of about 0.75°C, between 04/01/2003 and 05/04/2003. In 2007 the same eight reef<br />
sites were surveyed applying a similar video-transect technique. Six, 20 m long and 0.21 m<br />
wide, belt-transects from each reef site were analyzed, and organisms were identified under 20<br />
random points in each image (frame) in a total of 100 frames per transect. For comparing 2003<br />
and 2007 coral cover, T-test was used with an á = 0.05. The results show that living coral cover<br />
didn’t change significantly (X = 14.0±8.1% in 2003 to X = 13.1±10.2% in 2007, p = 0.836). In<br />
2007 bleaching was mild in Todos os Santos Bay affecting only 10.7±9.8% coral cover of the<br />
investigated reefs. Coral reefs from Todos os Santos Bay have been suffering from changes in<br />
the bay water quality mainly caused by the increased runoff of pollutant and sedimentation, as<br />
well as over exploitation of reef resources using, sometimes, prohibited fishing practices, and<br />
coral bleaching seems to be an additional factor. Because of the persistence of Todos os Santos<br />
Bay fauna to all these environmental stresses, its coral fauna can be considered as a resilient<br />
one.<br />
18.681<br />
A Strategic Approach For Developing A National Baseline Coral Reef Condition<br />
Patricia BRADLEY 1 , Wayne DAVIS* 2 , William FISHER 3 , Michael MCDONALD 4<br />
1 Office of Research and Development (ORD)/NHEERL/AED, U.S. EPA, Key West, FL,<br />
2 Office of Environmental Information, U.S. EPA, Ft. Meade, MD, 3 Office of Research and<br />
Development/NHEERL/GED, U.S. EPA, Gulf Breeze, FL, 4 Office of Research and<br />
Development/NHEERL, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC<br />
The U.S. Congress, American public, and other interested parties want to know the condition of<br />
U.S. and territorial coral reef ecosystems. They want to know whether the reefs’ conditions are<br />
getting better or worse, and whether our programs and policies are making a difference. Many<br />
organizations monitor coral reefs, but these efforts generally operate independently of one<br />
another, have many different missions and mandates, and are fairly localized. There is a critical<br />
need for nationally-consistent, comprehensive, and scientifically-defensible monitoring to<br />
detect environmental status and trends for coral reef ecosystems.<br />
We propose to apply the approach developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s<br />
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP): development of unbiased<br />
statistical design frameworks, and sensitive ecological indicators that are responsive to a<br />
gradient of stressors. This approach has been successfully applied for freshwater, estuarine and<br />
forest ecosystems and is transferable to assess coral reef ecosystems at state, regional, and<br />
national scales. Developing and maintaining such a coral reef monitoring program requires a<br />
partnership among the various federal, state and territorial agencies with responsibilities for<br />
coral reefs.<br />
Our first application of this approach is in the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI). In 2006, indicators<br />
were evaluated across stressor gradients using EPA’s recently published Stony Coral Rapid<br />
Bioassessment Protocol. In 2007, a probabilistic sample design was used to monitor the coral<br />
reefs around St. Croix, USVI and a similar design will be used for St. John and St. Thomas,<br />
USVI in 2008. These results, coupled with those of other agencies and organizations will<br />
provide valid indicators and data for EPA’s “Report on the Environment” and begin to address<br />
the current condition of the Nation’s coral reef ecosystems and the impacts of human activities<br />
upon them.<br />
433