24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Mini-Symposium 17: Emerging Techniques in Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis<br />

17.565<br />

Different Pigments Composition Can Influence The Remote Sensing Reflectance Of<br />

Caribbean Shallow-Water Coral Species<br />

Juan TORRES* 1 , Roy ARMSTRONG 2<br />

1 Biology Department, <strong>University</strong> of Puerto Rico at Rio Piedras, San Juan, Puerto Rico,<br />

2 Department of Marine Sciences, <strong>University</strong> of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez, Lajas, Puerto<br />

Rico<br />

The pigment composition of the Caribbean shallow-water coral species Acropora<br />

cervicornis and Porites porites was determined using HPLC analysis. Nineteen different<br />

pigments were identified including chlorophylls and carotenes. Of these, ten were<br />

common in both species; six appeared only in A. cervicornis, and four appeared only in<br />

P. porites. It is hypothesized this is the result of different zooxanthellae clades that<br />

inhabit these coral species. The results showed how the differences in pigments<br />

composition influence the remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) signal of both species. While<br />

the Rrs appeared to be very similar in both species, derivative analysis showed marked<br />

differences resulting from the absorption of the pigments, especially in the blue region of<br />

the spectrum (400-500 nm). The combination of both techniques can be used to further<br />

create a spectral library to identify shallow-water coral species in hyperspectral images.<br />

17.566<br />

A New Method for Monitoring Along-Track Topographic Complexity<br />

Monica PALASEANU-LOVEJOY* 1 , John BROCK 2 , Kristi FOSTER 3 , Amar<br />

NAYEGANDHI 4 , David NAGLE 1<br />

1 FISC, USGS / Jacobs, St. Petersburg, FL, 2 FISC, USGS, St. Petersburg, FL, 3 NOVA<br />

<strong>University</strong>, Dania Beach, FL, 4 FISC, USGS / ETI, St. Petersburg, FL<br />

Topographic variability is an important characteristic of habitat complexity that<br />

influences the abundance and distribution of many reef organisms. One measure of<br />

topographic variability is rugosity, defined as the ratio of the real distance between two<br />

points and their projected distance on a horizontal plane. Traditionally, rugosity is<br />

measured in the field using the chain transect method. In this study, we used Marimatech<br />

sounder data collected at a nominal horizontal spacing of 2 to 10 cm to calculate alongtrack<br />

rugosity. Concomitant, geo-located images were acquired via the Along-Track<br />

Reef-Imaging System (ATRIS) placed opposite the Marimatech sounder transducer on<br />

the survey vessel. The ATRIS Data Analysis and Processing Tool (ADAPT) allows<br />

interactive geographic browsing, scalling, and classification of each image. We identified<br />

six different habitats: seagrass, sand, hard ground / algae / turf, dense coral reef, sparse<br />

coral reef, and dead coral. Each point for which rugosity was calculated was associated<br />

with the closest classified image. The Welch t-test confirmed that the true divergence in<br />

population means is different than zero. The f-test endorsed that the true population<br />

variances are statistically dissimilar for each habitat class, although hardground, dense<br />

coral and sparse coral variances were not essentially different than dead coral variances<br />

in the Fligner - Killen test of homogeneity of variances. The mean habitat rugosity values<br />

indicated that seagrass had the least complex topography, with complexity increasing<br />

from dead corals to sand, hard-ground / algae/ turf, and sparse mixed reef. Probably sand<br />

had a higher rugosity mean value due to dense ripples. The dense mixed reef had the<br />

highest habitat complexity among the six identified classes.<br />

17.567<br />

Assessing Patterns Of Patch Reef Distribution in The Lower Florida Keys, Usa, Using<br />

Ikonos Satellite Imagery<br />

Melanie PETERS* 1 , David PALANDRO 1 , Pamela HALLOCK-MULLER 2 , Eugene SHINN 2<br />

1 Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, St. Petersburg, FL, 2 College of Marine Science,<br />

<strong>University</strong> of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL<br />

Declines in overall coral cover throughout the Florida Keys are well-documented. However,<br />

coral cover on patch reefs is variable, with high coral cover remaining on some patch reefs. As<br />

live coral cover on the offshore bank reefs continues to decline, remaining shallow-water coral<br />

assemblages may ultimately be concentrated in the large number of thriving patch reefs.<br />

Previous efforts to determine the number of patch reefs in the Lower Keys utilized aerial survey<br />

methods. A major study published in 1977 identified 420 reef structures from Big Pine to the<br />

Marquesas Keys. Our study used IKONOS satellite imagery to find and map the size and<br />

distribution of patch reefs; we identified approximately 2500 patch reefs in the same region.<br />

Initial observations indicate that patch-reef distribution is non-random and appears to correlate<br />

with geologic features. Patch reefs occur in three distinct cross-shelf zones, each with increasing<br />

distance from shore. There is also clear segregation between patch-reef morphologies, with<br />

different types rarely sharing a given zone. It is crucial to understand not only the spatial<br />

distribution of patch reefs, but also why they originated and persist in specific geographic<br />

locations. Previous studies cited Florida Bay water and mobile calcareous sands as primary<br />

determinants of patch-reef growth, with patch-reef development focused on trough edges<br />

bordering Hawk Channel. In addition to the patch reefs along Hawk Channel, we found a third<br />

zone of thriving patch reefs near shore (0.3% - 52% coral cover, mean 17%). Key to our longterm<br />

analysis will be to determine what affects, if any, environmental and geological influences<br />

have on patch morphology and how this is manifested in the spatial arrangement of patch reefs.<br />

17.568<br />

Sea Surface Temperature Trend in The Coral Triangle in Two Decades<br />

Eileen PEÑAFLOR* 1 , William SKIRVING 2 , Scott HERON 2 , Laura DAVID 1<br />

1 Marine Science Institute, <strong>University</strong> of the Philippines, Quezon, Philippines, 2 Coral Reef<br />

Watch, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Townsville, Australia<br />

Increasing ocean temperature has become one of the major concerns in the recent decades.<br />

Pronounced increase in sea surface temperature (SST), for example, had caused massive coral<br />

bleaching in many regions particularly during the 1997-98 ENSO event. This study focuses on<br />

the Coral Triangle and utilizes the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration-<br />

Coral Reef Watch (NOAA-CRW) SST from 1985 to 2006 to investigate the SST condition in<br />

the area during this period. Another NOAA-CRW product, Hotspot, is also used as a supporting<br />

data to locate areas with anomalously warm surface waters. Results show that this region’s SST<br />

has been increasing at the rate of 0.2 oC/decade on average from 1985-2006. Warming within<br />

this region, however, is not uniform in space or time. Overall, sites located on the north and east<br />

of the triangle show a faster warming trend. Also, although an overall increase has been seen<br />

through the years, the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in 1991 had contributed to<br />

a significant lowering down of SST in the region for at least 2 years after the eruption.<br />

405

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!