11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
14.432<br />
Gene flow of Symbiodinium on the Great Barrier Reef is limited and primarily<br />
mediated by sea circulation patterns<br />
Emily HOWELLS* 1 , Madeleine VAN OPPEN 2 , Bette WILLIS 1<br />
1 Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence and School of Marine and Tropical<br />
Biology, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Townsville, QLD, Australia, 2 Australian Institute of<br />
Marine Science, Townsville, QLD, Australia<br />
The resilience of Symbiodinium types harboured by corals depends on population genetic<br />
diversity and inter-reef connectivity. This study presents genetic analyses of Great Barrier<br />
Reef (GBR) populations of clade C Symbiodinium hosted by the alcyonacean coral,<br />
Sinularia flexibilis. Allelic variation at 4 microsatellite loci demonstrated that 12 reef<br />
populations of Symbiodinium were genetically differentiated at spatial scales from 16 to<br />
1,300 km (mean pairwise ΦST = 0.21). For 11 of 12 populations, genetic differentiation<br />
was strongly related to geographic distance between populations (r = 0.77), indicating<br />
that gene flow is restricted for Symbiodinium hosted by S.flexibilis on the GBR. Patterns<br />
of population structure reflect longshore circulation and limited cross-shelf mixing on the<br />
GBR, suggesting that passive transport by currents is the primary mechanism by which<br />
low levels of dispersal occur in Symbiodinium types acquired horizontally. Genetic<br />
diversity of Symbiodinium populations was on average 1.5 to 2 times higher at mid to<br />
outer shelf reefs than on inner-shelf reefs. Patterns of genetic diversity were consistent<br />
with immigration of Symbiodinium genotypes to the northern GBR which have been<br />
spread to mid and outer shelf reefs via longshore currents. Additional factors that may<br />
have shaped cross-shelf differences in diversity are historical sea-level fluctuations and<br />
recent bleaching events. Symbiodinium populations hosted by S.flexibilis are suggested to<br />
be susceptible to losses of genetic diversity, such as those likely to occur with increased<br />
threats to coral reefs. There is little opportunity for lost genetic diversity to be replenished<br />
by migration or for beneficial alleles potentially involved in adaptive processes to be<br />
spread beyond local reefs.<br />
14.433<br />
Testing Natural Markers in Otoliths From Known-Origin Larvae Of Coral Reef<br />
Fish<br />
Michael BERUMEN* 1 , Harvey WALSH 1 , Serge PLANES 2 , Geoffrey JONES 3 , Simon<br />
THORROLD 1<br />
1 Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, 2 Ecole<br />
Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France, 3 ARC Centre of<br />
Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Townsville, Australia<br />
Analysing the chemical composition of otoliths from fish is a commonly employed<br />
technique to search for a signal indicative of a particular habitat at some point in a fish’s<br />
environmental history. In connectivity studies, this method frequently runs into a problem<br />
as the origin of most larval fish is unknown, reducing the ability of the technique to<br />
definitively identify a source location among locations with subtle water mass<br />
differences. Following an intensive self-recruitment study on an isolated island in Kimbe<br />
Bay, Papua New Guinea, genetic parentage analysis (genotyping) confirmed the origin of<br />
about 50% of 110 new recruits of the orange clownfish, Amphiprion percula, on Kimbe<br />
Island. Known-origin larvae were those confirmed to have been spawned by parents on<br />
Kimbe Island, while the remainder would have been spawned by parents on other reefs<br />
(with the nearest reef ~10km away). Using standard otolith composition analyses (laser<br />
ablation inductively coupled mass spectrometry, LA-ICPMS), we were able to compare<br />
the known-origin (self-recruiting) larvae against those known to have originated from<br />
reefs at least 10km away, testing for differences in elemental composition of their<br />
otoliths. We will discuss these findings and the implications for future studies attempting<br />
to use natural markers in studies of connectivity in coral reef fish populations.<br />
Poster Mini-Symposium 14: Reef Connectivity<br />
14.434<br />
Temporal Variations of Mangroves, Soft Bottoms and Coral Reefs Shorefishes<br />
Assemblages within a Lagoon Seascape, New Caledonia<br />
Laurent WANTIEZ* 1 , Michel KULBICKI 2<br />
1 <strong>University</strong> of New Caledonia, Noumea, New Caledonia, 2 IRD, Perpignan, France<br />
The shorefishes of St Vincent Bay (New Caledonia) were studied on a monthly basis during one<br />
year in three adjacent habitats: coral reefs, mangroves and soft bottoms. The objectives were to<br />
analyze the overlap and compare the temporal variations of the fish communities between the<br />
three habitats. Coral reefs were sampled using visual census, mangroves using gill nets and fyke<br />
net, and soft bottoms using a shrimp trawl and a fish trawl. In total, 485 species were censused<br />
in all three habitats. The species richness was significantly higher on coral reefs (300 species)<br />
than on soft bottoms (200 species) and in the mangroves (126 species). The number of families<br />
was not significantly different between habitats. Only 16 species and 19 families were observed<br />
in all three habitats. The species overlap was higher for mangroves, which shared 61.9% of its<br />
species with the other habitats, than soft bottoms (50.0%) and coral reefs (29.3%). The<br />
similarity (Kulczinski Index) was higher between mangroves and soft bottoms (Ik=34.3%) than<br />
between soft bottoms and coral reefs (Ik=23.1%), mangroves and coral reefs being the most<br />
different (Ik=16.7%). The monthly variations of the species richness were significantly different<br />
between habitats and the monthly variations of the standardized density and biomass indices<br />
were not correlated, indicating different temporal patterns between habitats. The monthly<br />
variations of the number of overlapping species between habitats were not significant. Only<br />
four species were successively present as juveniles in the mangroves and as adults on the soft<br />
bottoms. Our results suggest that the links between the coral reefs and the mangroves, and to a<br />
lower extend the coral reefs and the soft bottoms, are limited and lower than in the Caribbean.<br />
14.435<br />
Are Montastraea Faveolata Populations Connected Along The Mesoamerican Barrier<br />
Reef System?<br />
Isabel PORTO* 1 , Camilo SALAZAR 2 , Tonya SHEARER 3<br />
1 Department of Biology, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia, 2 Department of<br />
Biology, Genetics Institute, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia, 3 School of Biology,<br />
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA<br />
For benthic sessile coral reef dwellers, the larval stage is very important for dispersal. There has<br />
been controversy between larval retention versus long distance dispersal as the main life history<br />
strategy for marine organisms. There is limited information concerning coral reef larvae<br />
dispersal in the Caribbean where coral reefs are widespread and sustain a huge diversity of<br />
marine organisms. Understanding levels of biological connectivity between and among reefs<br />
has important ecological and management implications. It is necessary to determine the<br />
potential resources of reef recruits in order to successfully create Marine Protected Areas<br />
(MPA) and assess the efficacy of already established MPAs. Montastraea faveolata has<br />
widespread distribution on Caribbean reefs and is considered one of the major reef-builders in<br />
the area. Using eight variable microsatellite loci, the population structure of M. faveolata was<br />
discerned to answer the following questions with regard to the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef<br />
System: What is the biological connectivity among M. faveolata over time and space? Have<br />
larvae sources or patterns of connectivity changed over time? Are M. faveolata generally selfseeding<br />
or dependent on non-local larval source populations? Locations included in this<br />
analysis are Mexico (Puerto Morelos and Cozumel), Belize (Glover’s reef, Columbus reef,<br />
Turneffe and Ambergris), Guatemala (Punta Manabique) and Honduras (Cayo Cochinos,<br />
Roatan and Bahia Cortes).<br />
372