24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14.432<br />

Gene flow of Symbiodinium on the Great Barrier Reef is limited and primarily<br />

mediated by sea circulation patterns<br />

Emily HOWELLS* 1 , Madeleine VAN OPPEN 2 , Bette WILLIS 1<br />

1 Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence and School of Marine and Tropical<br />

Biology, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Townsville, QLD, Australia, 2 Australian Institute of<br />

Marine Science, Townsville, QLD, Australia<br />

The resilience of Symbiodinium types harboured by corals depends on population genetic<br />

diversity and inter-reef connectivity. This study presents genetic analyses of Great Barrier<br />

Reef (GBR) populations of clade C Symbiodinium hosted by the alcyonacean coral,<br />

Sinularia flexibilis. Allelic variation at 4 microsatellite loci demonstrated that 12 reef<br />

populations of Symbiodinium were genetically differentiated at spatial scales from 16 to<br />

1,300 km (mean pairwise ΦST = 0.21). For 11 of 12 populations, genetic differentiation<br />

was strongly related to geographic distance between populations (r = 0.77), indicating<br />

that gene flow is restricted for Symbiodinium hosted by S.flexibilis on the GBR. Patterns<br />

of population structure reflect longshore circulation and limited cross-shelf mixing on the<br />

GBR, suggesting that passive transport by currents is the primary mechanism by which<br />

low levels of dispersal occur in Symbiodinium types acquired horizontally. Genetic<br />

diversity of Symbiodinium populations was on average 1.5 to 2 times higher at mid to<br />

outer shelf reefs than on inner-shelf reefs. Patterns of genetic diversity were consistent<br />

with immigration of Symbiodinium genotypes to the northern GBR which have been<br />

spread to mid and outer shelf reefs via longshore currents. Additional factors that may<br />

have shaped cross-shelf differences in diversity are historical sea-level fluctuations and<br />

recent bleaching events. Symbiodinium populations hosted by S.flexibilis are suggested to<br />

be susceptible to losses of genetic diversity, such as those likely to occur with increased<br />

threats to coral reefs. There is little opportunity for lost genetic diversity to be replenished<br />

by migration or for beneficial alleles potentially involved in adaptive processes to be<br />

spread beyond local reefs.<br />

14.433<br />

Testing Natural Markers in Otoliths From Known-Origin Larvae Of Coral Reef<br />

Fish<br />

Michael BERUMEN* 1 , Harvey WALSH 1 , Serge PLANES 2 , Geoffrey JONES 3 , Simon<br />

THORROLD 1<br />

1 Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, 2 Ecole<br />

Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Université de Perpignan, Perpignan, France, 3 ARC Centre of<br />

Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Townsville, Australia<br />

Analysing the chemical composition of otoliths from fish is a commonly employed<br />

technique to search for a signal indicative of a particular habitat at some point in a fish’s<br />

environmental history. In connectivity studies, this method frequently runs into a problem<br />

as the origin of most larval fish is unknown, reducing the ability of the technique to<br />

definitively identify a source location among locations with subtle water mass<br />

differences. Following an intensive self-recruitment study on an isolated island in Kimbe<br />

Bay, Papua New Guinea, genetic parentage analysis (genotyping) confirmed the origin of<br />

about 50% of 110 new recruits of the orange clownfish, Amphiprion percula, on Kimbe<br />

Island. Known-origin larvae were those confirmed to have been spawned by parents on<br />

Kimbe Island, while the remainder would have been spawned by parents on other reefs<br />

(with the nearest reef ~10km away). Using standard otolith composition analyses (laser<br />

ablation inductively coupled mass spectrometry, LA-ICPMS), we were able to compare<br />

the known-origin (self-recruiting) larvae against those known to have originated from<br />

reefs at least 10km away, testing for differences in elemental composition of their<br />

otoliths. We will discuss these findings and the implications for future studies attempting<br />

to use natural markers in studies of connectivity in coral reef fish populations.<br />

Poster Mini-Symposium 14: Reef Connectivity<br />

14.434<br />

Temporal Variations of Mangroves, Soft Bottoms and Coral Reefs Shorefishes<br />

Assemblages within a Lagoon Seascape, New Caledonia<br />

Laurent WANTIEZ* 1 , Michel KULBICKI 2<br />

1 <strong>University</strong> of New Caledonia, Noumea, New Caledonia, 2 IRD, Perpignan, France<br />

The shorefishes of St Vincent Bay (New Caledonia) were studied on a monthly basis during one<br />

year in three adjacent habitats: coral reefs, mangroves and soft bottoms. The objectives were to<br />

analyze the overlap and compare the temporal variations of the fish communities between the<br />

three habitats. Coral reefs were sampled using visual census, mangroves using gill nets and fyke<br />

net, and soft bottoms using a shrimp trawl and a fish trawl. In total, 485 species were censused<br />

in all three habitats. The species richness was significantly higher on coral reefs (300 species)<br />

than on soft bottoms (200 species) and in the mangroves (126 species). The number of families<br />

was not significantly different between habitats. Only 16 species and 19 families were observed<br />

in all three habitats. The species overlap was higher for mangroves, which shared 61.9% of its<br />

species with the other habitats, than soft bottoms (50.0%) and coral reefs (29.3%). The<br />

similarity (Kulczinski Index) was higher between mangroves and soft bottoms (Ik=34.3%) than<br />

between soft bottoms and coral reefs (Ik=23.1%), mangroves and coral reefs being the most<br />

different (Ik=16.7%). The monthly variations of the species richness were significantly different<br />

between habitats and the monthly variations of the standardized density and biomass indices<br />

were not correlated, indicating different temporal patterns between habitats. The monthly<br />

variations of the number of overlapping species between habitats were not significant. Only<br />

four species were successively present as juveniles in the mangroves and as adults on the soft<br />

bottoms. Our results suggest that the links between the coral reefs and the mangroves, and to a<br />

lower extend the coral reefs and the soft bottoms, are limited and lower than in the Caribbean.<br />

14.435<br />

Are Montastraea Faveolata Populations Connected Along The Mesoamerican Barrier<br />

Reef System?<br />

Isabel PORTO* 1 , Camilo SALAZAR 2 , Tonya SHEARER 3<br />

1 Department of Biology, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia, 2 Department of<br />

Biology, Genetics Institute, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia, 3 School of Biology,<br />

Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA<br />

For benthic sessile coral reef dwellers, the larval stage is very important for dispersal. There has<br />

been controversy between larval retention versus long distance dispersal as the main life history<br />

strategy for marine organisms. There is limited information concerning coral reef larvae<br />

dispersal in the Caribbean where coral reefs are widespread and sustain a huge diversity of<br />

marine organisms. Understanding levels of biological connectivity between and among reefs<br />

has important ecological and management implications. It is necessary to determine the<br />

potential resources of reef recruits in order to successfully create Marine Protected Areas<br />

(MPA) and assess the efficacy of already established MPAs. Montastraea faveolata has<br />

widespread distribution on Caribbean reefs and is considered one of the major reef-builders in<br />

the area. Using eight variable microsatellite loci, the population structure of M. faveolata was<br />

discerned to answer the following questions with regard to the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef<br />

System: What is the biological connectivity among M. faveolata over time and space? Have<br />

larvae sources or patterns of connectivity changed over time? Are M. faveolata generally selfseeding<br />

or dependent on non-local larval source populations? Locations included in this<br />

analysis are Mexico (Puerto Morelos and Cozumel), Belize (Glover’s reef, Columbus reef,<br />

Turneffe and Ambergris), Guatemala (Punta Manabique) and Honduras (Cayo Cochinos,<br />

Roatan and Bahia Cortes).<br />

372

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!