11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Poster Mini-Symposium 10: Ecological Processes on Today's Reef Ecosystems<br />
10.355<br />
Nutrients And Herbivores: What Do We Know About Their Relative Importance<br />
On Coral Reefs?<br />
Jennifer SMITH* 1<br />
1 NCEAS, <strong>University</strong> of California, Santa Barabara, Santa Barbara, CA<br />
Coral reefs are among the most diverse and productive ecosystems on the planet but are<br />
also significantly threatened by numerous natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Phase<br />
shifts or alternate stable states where reef building corals are replaced by fleshy algae<br />
have become more and more common. While large scale global impacts such as climate<br />
change are clearly important, local impacts such as overfishing and nutrient pollution can<br />
also alter community dynamics. The relative importance of these top-down and bottomup<br />
controls on reef community structure have been debated by scientists for years. Thus<br />
my goals were to test the independent and interactive effects of nutrient enrichment and<br />
herbivore exclusion on benthic community structure on a coral-dominated reef in Hawaii<br />
and to follow this empirical approach with a global meta-analysis. My results show that<br />
both nutrients and herbivores are important in regulating benthic community structure but<br />
more importantly, they do so in different ways. Herbivores tend to reduce fleshy algal<br />
abundance while promoting the abundance of calcifying algae and coral. Nutrient<br />
enrichment alone tends to enhance algal growth rates but not necessarily abundance as<br />
herbivores can often consume this extra production. Finally the simultaneous effects of<br />
herbivore removal and nutrient enrichment lead to different benthic assemblages, largely<br />
dominated by fleshy algae. Results from both empirical and meta-analytic approaches<br />
suggest that overfishing and nutrient pollution are important to the management and<br />
future conservation of coral reefs.<br />
10.356<br />
Natural Lesions, Recovery And Partial Mortality in A Population Of Montastraea<br />
Annularis At A Caribbean Reef<br />
Elvira ALVARADO CH.* 1 , Alberto ACOSTA 2<br />
1 Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Bogota, Colombia,<br />
2 Facultad de Biologia, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia<br />
Populations of Montastraea annularis are showing signs of decline evidenced by high<br />
partial and total mortality, and low recruitment rates. Due to the high number of ramets<br />
(n= 9646) with partial (42%) and total (12%) mortality found in 102 colonies of M.<br />
annularis in a Marine Protected Area of Colombia, we followed 88 healthy ramets to<br />
observe type, size and duration of natural lesions. During a year, six types of lesions were<br />
found. 47% were caused by predation and 35% by interaction with algae. Bleaching<br />
(8%), interaction with sponges (1%) and with borrowing organisms (2%) as well as<br />
yellow blotch disease (0.5%) were the other type of natural lesions. Most lesions were<br />
less than 5cm2but some were as big as 60cm2. Size of lesions was not correlated with<br />
type. From May through September abundance of lesions increased affecting between 10<br />
and 50% of superficial area of ramets. 83% of the lesions recovered,13% did not and 4%<br />
changed type. In general lesions from predation and bleaching recovered in less than<br />
three months, while those caused by interaction with algae did not. Nevertheless we<br />
observed that some lesions caused by predation (N=13), bleaching (N=7) and yellow<br />
blotch (N=3), were invaded by algae turning into patches of partial mortality. In most of<br />
the lesions with algae, recovery was rare and lesions grew and became permanent<br />
features. By the end of the year, 25% of the ramets had partial mortality. These results<br />
suggest that chronic perturbations caused by predation and more frequently and intense<br />
bleaching events can be part of the causes for the decline in cover of M. annularis at the<br />
Caribbean reefs, as algae quickly invade these lesions.<br />
10.357<br />
Response Of Hard Bottom Fish Assemblages To Red Tide Outbreaks Off Southwestern<br />
Florida.<br />
David SNYDER* 1<br />
1 CSA International, Inc., Stuart, FL<br />
Fish kills from red tide outbreaks have been reported off Florida’s west coast for decades, but<br />
rarely has the response of fish assemblages been directly observed for particular habitats.<br />
Following multiple red tide outbreaks during the summer and fall of 2005 and 2006, resident<br />
fishes either died or emigrated from hard bottom habitats in nearshore (5 to 7 m) and offshore<br />
(12 to 15 m) waters offshore Venice, Florida. Dead or dying fishes observed during 2005 and<br />
2006 were reef-associated forms such as eels, sea basses (Serranidae), grunts (Haemulidae),<br />
porgies (Sparidae), jawfishes (Opistognathidae), filefishes (Monacanthidae), and<br />
porcupinefishes (Diodontidae). Survey transects established for monitoring epibiota within<br />
nearshore (n = 18 transects) and offshore (n = 5 transects) sites during 2005; but prior to the<br />
initial red tide outbreaks, allowed qualitative assessment of pre-outbreak fish assemblages. In<br />
fall of 2007, fishes were censused along these same transects following a summer with no red<br />
tide outbreaks. In total, 41 taxa had re-colonized the hard bottom areas, several of which were<br />
not present prior to the 2005 and 2006 outbreaks. Overall, Lagodon rhomboides, Serranus<br />
subligarius, Sparisoma sp., Halichoeres bivittatus , Epinephelus morio, Diplectrum formosum,<br />
Diplodus holbrooki, and Lutjanus synagris accounted for 71% of the numbers of fishes<br />
observed in 2007. Taxa observed were represented by adult, juvenile, and newly settled<br />
individuals. Qualitative differences in species composition among years, depths, and transects<br />
were visualized with ordination analyses on a binary resemblance matrix. The results are<br />
compared to other documented cases of reef fish recovery following catastrophic mortality<br />
10.358<br />
Comparison Of The Feeding Ecology Of The Introduced Snapper lutjanus Kasmira And<br />
Native Goatfishes in Hawai`i<br />
Brett SCHUMACHER* 1 , James PARRISH 2,3<br />
1 Division of Aquatic Resources, Hawaii Dept. of Land & Natural Resources, Honolulu, HI,<br />
2 Hawaii Cooperative Fishery Research Unit/Dept. of Zoology, USGS/<strong>University</strong> of Hawaii at<br />
Manoa, Honolulu, HI, 3 Hawaii Cooperative Fishery Research Unit/Dept. of Zoology,<br />
USGS/<strong>University</strong> of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu<br />
Lutjanus kasmira (Family: Lutjanidae) has a broad native geographic range, and is found in<br />
near-shore reef habitats from Eastern Africa through Polynesia. However, it was not present in<br />
Hawai`i until it was deliberately introduced during the mid-twentieth century. L. kasmira was<br />
introduced to provide a new fishery resource, but it has not gained much acceptance in this<br />
regard. Many fishers consider L. kasmira to be a nuisance, and blame it for declines in catches<br />
and populations of native fishery species. L. kasmira is purported to compete with and/or<br />
depredate a variety of resource species, including ornamental fish species such as Zebrasoma<br />
flavescens (Family: Acanthuridae), food fishes such as Mulloidichthys vanicolensis (Family:<br />
Mullidae), and crustaceans such as Ranina ranina (Family: Raninidae). To address these<br />
concerns, we analyzed the feeding ecology of L. kasmira and three native species of goatfish:<br />
M. flavolineatus, M. vanicolensis, and Parupeneus multifasciatus. The pair of species with the<br />
greatest taxonomic dietary similarity was L. kasmira and P. multifasciatus. This finding was<br />
somewhat surprising considering that our data indicate that these species feed at different times<br />
of day. The congeners M. flavolineatus and M. vanicolensis had the second greatest dietary<br />
similarity of the species in this study. L. kasmira was found to consume larger prey on average<br />
than any of the native species. The suggestion that L. kasmira preys on native resource fish and<br />
crustacean species was not supported by our data. Ultimately, our analyses did not detect<br />
evidence of ecological interactions that would be likely to adversely affect populations of these<br />
native fishery species through predation or competition for food.<br />
351