24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Mini-Symposium 10: Ecological Processes on Today's Reef Ecosystems<br />

10.317<br />

The Feeding Ecology Of Select Herbivorous Fishes in Two Reef Habitats Of Cuba<br />

Alain DURÁN 1 , Rodolfo CLARO* 1<br />

1 Departamento de Biología Marina, Instituto de Oceanología, La Habana, Cuba<br />

The feeding activity and the impact of three herbivorous fishes (Sparisoma viride, Scarus<br />

iserti and Acanthurus coeruleus) was studied at two coral reefs during the dry (February)<br />

and rainy (August) seasons of 2006. The reef at Acuario (National Park Guanahacabibes)<br />

is relatively pristine, while the reef at the north coast of Havana City (IdO) is subjected to<br />

pollution and fishing pressure. Herbivore fish composition and foraging intensity were<br />

measured for all Acanthurid and Scarid species, by measuring the total bite rates per 1 m2<br />

of reef substrate during 5 minutes intervals (25 replicates). Concurrently, species<br />

foraging intensity was mesured for juvenile, intermediate, and adult phases number of<br />

bites in 10 min., 10 replicates). Algal consumption rate was estimated using a coefficent<br />

of consumed biomass per bite, for each size class. The algal cover was sampled at 20 m<br />

linear transects with 4 replicates at each site. Food items were assessed sampling algae at<br />

the observed bited substrates. Compared to Acuario, herbivores in IdO showed lower<br />

species richness and higher density, with the exception of large-sized parrotfish, which<br />

were almost absent due to intense fishing. The highest bite rate was observed for the<br />

smallest fish size, but net comsuption rate was three times greater in adult fishes. S.<br />

viride had lower levels of foraging intensity than A. coeruleus and S. iserti, possibly due<br />

to larger consumption per bite. Levels of foraging activity were lower in February. Algal<br />

cover was lower in Acuario where herbivore density was higher but fish size was smaller.<br />

In both locations epilithic algae were the preferred food.<br />

10.318<br />

Variation in Social Foraging By Fishes Across A Coral Reef Landscape<br />

Peter AUSTER* 1 , James LINDHOLM 2<br />

1 <strong>University</strong> of Connecticut, Groton, CT, 2 California State <strong>University</strong> Monterey Bay,<br />

Seaside, CA<br />

Coral reef landscapes are composed of a matrix of habitats which exhibit a gradient of<br />

complexity at multiple spatial scales. This variation has been shown, in part, to influence<br />

the composition of fish communities. It follows that such variation will also influence<br />

the type and rate of species interactions. In this study, we quantified the rates of social<br />

foraging bouts in relation to community composition across four distinct habitat types<br />

(continuous reef, coral rubble-sand, reef edge, and spur and groove) at Conch Reef in the<br />

Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (USA). The purpose of dividing the reef<br />

landscape into particular habitat units was to ascertain if rates of social foraging vary in<br />

consistent ways in relation to habitat attributes. Results indicated that there while there<br />

were no clear divisions in species composition that could be correlated with habitat type,<br />

comparisons of rates of social foraging based on total (mixed and single species foraging<br />

groups) and mixed species bouts alone showed that rates of social foraging across<br />

habitats were not equal. Further, both Fishers diversity and species richness measures<br />

were not equal across habitat types, with lowest mean values in coral rubble habitat<br />

where rates of social foraging were highest. These results highlight the complexity of<br />

facilitative species interactions in coral reef landscapes.<br />

10.319<br />

Recruitment Potential And Recruitment Survival As A Function Of Habitat Degradation<br />

Suzanne MILLS* 1 , David LECCHINI 2 , Pascal DUMAS 2 , Eric PARMENTIER 3<br />

1 Biologie et Ecologie Tropicale et Méditerranéenne, UMR 5244 EPHE-CNRS-UPVD,<br />

Perpignan, France, 2 UR 128 CoRéUs, Institute for Research and Development (IRD), Noumea,<br />

New Caledonia, 3 Laboratoire de Morphologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Université de Liège,<br />

Liege, Belgium<br />

Knowledge of the recruitment potential, as well as post-recruitment survival, between different<br />

reef habitats, would improve the management of target species and conservation of reef<br />

ecosystems. Many coral reefs have been subjected to, and continue to suffer from, habitat<br />

degradation due to both natural and anthropogenic stress. However, the effects of habitat<br />

degradation on larval recruitment potential and on the survival of settled recruits are currently<br />

not known. We aimed to distinguish between these two processes by simultaneously measuring<br />

survival and recruitment of vertebrate and invertebrate larvae across habitats differing in their<br />

percentage of coral cover (healthy vs dead: 50 % vs 12 % coral cover) with a 100 % sand<br />

habitat as a control. Recruitment and survival were monitored after 10, 20, 40 and 80 days on<br />

atolls in French Polynesia. Lower recruitment was identified for multiple molluscan, gastropod<br />

and sponge species in the control sand habitat, possibly reflecting the lack of habitat and/or<br />

conspecifics attraction cues, either acoustic or chemical. On the other hand polychaetes and<br />

opistobranchs showed higher recruitment in control sand habitats. One molluscan species, the<br />

pearl oyster, of considerable economic importance in French Polynesia, showed lower growth<br />

in the control sand habitat. Differences in recruitment and survival will be discussed as a<br />

function of coral cover and habitat degradation, as well as consequences for reef ecosystem<br />

conservation and management.<br />

10.320<br />

Effect of the Herbivorous West Indian Spider Crab (Mithrax spinosissimus) on Patch<br />

Reef Algal Communities in the Florida Keys (USA)<br />

Angela MOJICA* 1 , Mark BUTLER 1<br />

1 Biological Sciences, Old Dominion <strong>University</strong>, Norfolk, VA<br />

Many Caribbean coral reefs have changed from coral- to algal- dominance, and the decline of<br />

piscine and echinoderm grazers in these communities has played a significant role in this phaseshift.<br />

Virtually unknown, however, is the effect of the herbivorous West Indian spider crab<br />

(Mithrax spinosissimus) on coral reef community structure. Therefore we examined the<br />

foraging ecology and impact of spider crab herbivory on inshore patch reefs in the Florida<br />

Keys, Florida (USA). Crabs were held individually for 24 hrs and fed either four naturallyoccurring<br />

algae (Ulva sp., Laurencia sp., Dyctiota sp., and Halimeda sp.), or clumps of mixed<br />

macro-algae (Halimeda sp. + Dyctiota sp.) from the reef to determine diet preferences and<br />

consumption of crabs by size and sex. Preliminary analysis of these results showed that fleshy<br />

macro algae are preferred by M. spinossissimus over Halimeda sp. Rates of consumption<br />

obtained under laboratory conditions were compared with those obtained in the field, by<br />

encaging a single crab in cages that excluded all herbivores greater than 2cm in diameter. Rates<br />

of benthic algal production and macroalgal growth, estimated in situ on caged and un-caged<br />

natural plots and experimental plates surpassed the consumption rates possible by individual<br />

crabs. Our results indicate that M. spinosissimus as potential important consumers of<br />

macroalgae on reefs, but their ability to regulate reef macro-algal abundance or composition is<br />

diminished by their low density, low mobility, and perhaps lower activity in predator-rich<br />

environments such as reefs.<br />

342

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!