24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.183<br />

Identifying Potential Pathogens Of montipora White Syndrome Through Microbial<br />

Community Profiling<br />

Ashley SMITH* 1 , Teresa LEWIS 1 , Greta AEBY 1 , Thierry WORK 2 , Jo-Ann LEONG 1<br />

1 Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, <strong>University</strong> of Hawaii at Manoa, Kaneohe, HI,<br />

2 USGS-BRD-NWHIC, Honolulu, HI<br />

Montipora White Syndrome (MWS) is a tissue loss disease that affects the common reef<br />

coral, Montipora capitata, in Kaneohe Bay, Oahu Hawaii. This disease was first<br />

identified in the main Hawaiian Islands in 2004 and is the target of an investigation<br />

characterizing MWS using field, histology and molecular microbiological techniques.<br />

The objective of this component was to identify the bacterial communities in healthy and<br />

diseased Montipora capitata to establish a baseline for further experiments. Serial<br />

dilutions of coral mucus were plated on Glycerol Artificial Seawater (GASW) and<br />

Thiosulfate Citrate Bile Sucrose (TCBS) media to determine CFU/ml of culturable<br />

bacteria as well as relative abundance of Vibrio spp. Colony count data revealed an<br />

average 1.6 x103 CFU/ml of mucus in healthy fragments whereas mucus collected from<br />

the diseased front had 2.0 x104 CFU/ml. Comparison of samples from healthy and MWS<br />

samples revealed a five-fold increase of Vibrio spp. in the MWS samples, from an<br />

average 0.546% increasing to 2.67% Vibrio spp. respectively. Molecular analysis of 16S<br />

rDNA from individual colonies provides bacterial community profiles from healthy and<br />

diseased Montipora mucus samples. Uncultured bacteria from mucus have been<br />

identified by analysis of clone libraries. Based on these profiles, potential pathogens will<br />

be selected for challenge experiments with Montipora capitata fragments in an attempt to<br />

induce MWS.<br />

Research support funded by NOAA HCRI-RP #NOA06NOS4260200<br />

7.184<br />

The Unknowns in Coral Disease Identification: An Experiment To Assess<br />

Consensus Of Opinion Amongst Experts<br />

Edward HIND* 1 , Alasdair LINDOP 1<br />

1 Marine Science and Technology, Newcastle <strong>University</strong>, Newcastle upon Tyne, United<br />

Kingdom<br />

This is not the normal format for an abstract submission. This is a request to perform an<br />

actual experiment at the upcoming <strong>11th</strong> <strong>ICRS</strong>. As postgraduate students fairly new to the<br />

subject of coral disease we were amazed in a recent seminar on identification of these<br />

diseases at how hard it was to visually identify what the diseases were with certainty. We<br />

asked the question of more senior academics and they confirmed that there is still much<br />

debate in circles of expertise over actual identification. This intrigued us and further<br />

study showed us that there was very little study on these potential uncertainties. We were<br />

thus enthused to undertake a study ourselves. We conferred with the <strong>ICRS</strong> scientific<br />

organisers and in particular those organising the coral disease mini-symposium and<br />

believe a poster presentation would be an excellent format for undertaking this research.<br />

Instead of portraying any results the poster would have large pictures of approximately<br />

twenty coral assemblages with disease, lesions or damage. We would then ask passing<br />

experts at the conference a few questions about their experiences with coral diseases<br />

before getting them to assess the pictures on the poster. The questions would be asked<br />

via an anonymous hard copy questionnaire. We would not be looking for correct answers<br />

as such, but for the level of agreement between respondents. The high volume of<br />

potential respondents with expert knowledge at the <strong>ICRS</strong> would allow for statistically<br />

significant results to be derived. We would look to publish these results to advance<br />

understanding in coral disease research.<br />

Poster Mini-Symposium 7: Diseases on Coral Reefs<br />

7.185<br />

A Gall-Forming Copepod Causes Localized Bleaching Of The Coral Porites<br />

Hideyuki YAMASHIRO* 1<br />

1 Bioresources, Okinawa National College of Technology, Nago, Japan<br />

I found a small circular white spot on the surface of a coral Porites spp. on the reef flat of<br />

Okinawa Japan. This white spot resembles its color and size in PUWS (Porites Ulcerative<br />

White Spot Syndrome) reported from Philippine. However the white spot observed in<br />

Okinawan Porites was not PUWF disease, and found that a copepod Xenomolgus varius lives in<br />

the skeleton under the spot (Hoi and Yamashiro (2007). X. varius was found from the formalinwashout<br />

of the coral Porites in Mauritius (Humes and Stock, 1973) and it has not been unclear<br />

where this species live. The individuals situate in the skeleton and the head is set upward.<br />

Coral soft tissue has a small hole, through which they may get something and release larvae.<br />

The present study is to elucidate the reason why the copepods bleach coral tissue. To observe<br />

the relationship between copepod and symbiotic algae, histological sections were made.<br />

Furthermore the gut content of the copepod was investigated with a fluorescent microscope.<br />

This parasitic copepod did not affect coral reproduction. Observation showed that the copepod<br />

eats symbiotic algae of the host coral. To get sufficient food, they must need culture algae<br />

around them under dim light. The copepods have to inhibit the growth/photosynthesis of upper<br />

symbiotic algae as a curtain, because they need much sunlight for lower algae as a food. This<br />

cryptic copepod has highly organized strategies; transformation of the coral skeleton to live in,<br />

inhibition of symbiotic algae to uptake sunlight and culture. Although the effect of copepod<br />

inhabitation on host coral seems not to be serious at present, continuous monitoring is needed.<br />

7.186<br />

The Infection Of A Parasitic Copepod, Xarifia Obesa On Corals<br />

Ming-Jay HO* 1 , Yu-Rong CHENG 1 , Chang-Feng DAI 1<br />

1 Institue of Oceanography, NTU, Taipei, Taiwan<br />

86 species of xarifiids in four genera have been discovered associated with corals. They are<br />

widely distributed in the tropical Indo-Pacific region with an apparent absence from the central<br />

and eastern Pacific. To date, xarifiids have been known to live in the gastrovascular cavity of<br />

polyps of both hermatypic and ahermatypic scleractinians. However, how do xarifiids establish<br />

their association with corals and what do they consume are still unknown. When studying the<br />

parasitic copepods on corals from Taiwan, we observed the behavior of X. obesa by re-infecting<br />

it to a pocilloporid coral, Stylophora pistillata. The extension of coral tentacles were induced<br />

gradually when X. obesa was approaching a coral polyp. This phenomenon suggests that the<br />

xarifiids may be immuned to the nematocysts of corals and release some chemicals resulting in<br />

the relaxation of coral polyps. In addition, we also observed X. obesa with many zooxanthellae<br />

cells and pigments inside its body. It suggests that the xarifiids may consume zooxanthellae in<br />

addition to coral mucus. This may further induce negative effects to corals particularly when<br />

corals are under environmental stresses of bleaching.<br />

309

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!