24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Poster Mini-Symposium 5: Functional Biology of Corals and Coral Symbiosis: Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Physiology<br />

5.104<br />

Capacity For Plastic Growth Response Of porites Lobata in Fluctuating<br />

Temperature Regimes Varies Between Colonies<br />

Tyler WATERSON* 1 , Daniel BARSHIS 2 , Jonathon STILLMAN 3<br />

1 Marine Biology, Romberg Tiburon Center, San Francisco State <strong>University</strong>, Tiburon,<br />

CA, 2 Zoology, Hawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, Kaneohe, HI, 3 Biology, Romberg<br />

Tiburon Center, San Francisco State <strong>University</strong>, Tiburon, CA<br />

In the back reef lagoons of Ofu, American Samoa, corals thrive in temperatures (up to<br />

360C) higher than most corals can tolerate, and daily temperature fluctuates 2-40C<br />

depending on the size and flow of the pool. A reciprocal transplant study of two massive<br />

Porites species showed that corals from both forereef (constant temperature) and back<br />

reef environments grow more quickly in the back reef lagoon, although native back reef<br />

corals grow more quickly in all environments relative to conspecifics from the forereef.<br />

Here we examined whether these growth differences were due to temperature or other<br />

environmental factors, and whether growth responses were correlated with genotype. We<br />

collected samples of Porites lobata from forereef and back reef sites, with n=5 colonies<br />

per site and 25-30 replicates per colony. We transported the corals to our laboratory and<br />

split them between two tanks imitating either the forereef (290C) or back reef (fluctuating<br />

27-320C). After one month, new vertical tissue extension was measured. Both back reef<br />

and forereef corals had significantly higher tissue extension rates in the fluctuating tank<br />

than the constant-temperature tank, indicating phenotypic plasticity in growth in response<br />

to temperature. As in the field, back reef corals had significantly higher vertical tissue<br />

extension rates than forereef corals. However, colony-specific responses varied within<br />

each source environment. We hypothesize that this is an effect of host genetic<br />

polymorphism since no variation has been detected in the genotype of symbiodinium<br />

associated with P. lobata at this site (all colonies examined thus far host a similar strain<br />

of clade C). High genetic diversity has been seen in Porites species on this reef and we<br />

are currently examining the host genotype of the colonies studied using sequence<br />

homology of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nuclear ribosomal dna to<br />

compare growth responses with genotype.<br />

5.105<br />

Feeding Corals in Captivity: The Role Of Prey Type And Prey Concentration<br />

Ronald OSINGA* 1 , Tim WIJGERDE 1 , Fam CHARKO 1 , Johan VERRETH 1 , Dirk<br />

GRYMONPRE 2 , Silvia LAVORANO 3<br />

1 Wageningen <strong>University</strong>, Wageningen, Netherlands, 2 INVE BV, Dendermonde, Belgium,<br />

3 Acquario di Genova, Genova, Italy<br />

Corals feed heterotrophically to complement the nutrition they obtain through<br />

photosynthesis by zooxanthellae. Within the project CORALZOO (a collaboration<br />

between zoo’s and scientists), feeding efficiencies and growth rates of five species of<br />

corals are studied using different food types and concentrations. A protocol-template for<br />

feeding of corals in captivity will be deduced from the results.<br />

Colonies of the branching species S. caliendrum were used to study the uptake of live<br />

nauplii at different starting concentrations (1,000 – 20,0000 nauplii / l). Colonies of this<br />

species were incubated with nauplii in a mildly stirred, 1,5 l Perspex chamber. Uptake<br />

rates were remarkably high: a 14 ml coral colony could capture up to 10,000 nauplii<br />

within 15 minutes. At high starting concentrations, saturation occurred after 10 to 45<br />

minutes, while at lower starting concentrations, the incubation chamber was in most cases<br />

almost cleared of nauplii after 30 minutes.<br />

Long-term growth experiments with the branching coral Pocillopora damicornis showed<br />

that Artemia nauplii were a better food source than microalgae (Nannochloropsis sp.) and<br />

rotifers (Brachionis sp.). Most optimal was a (daily) start concentration of 2,000 nauplii<br />

per l.<br />

The boulder-shaped Galaxea fascicularis was used to test the ability of corals to capture<br />

four different Artemia-based feeds: live nauplii, dead (pasteurized) nauplii, Selcoenriched<br />

Instar II nauplii and Selco-enriched Instar II nauplii supplemented with a test<br />

compound. The corals preferred live over dead nauplii. Capture efficiency of Instar II<br />

nauplii was lower than for freshly hatched nauplii, but not significant when normalized to<br />

carbon content. Supplemented Instar II was captured with the same efficiency as nonsupplemented<br />

Instar II, which may enable development of tailor-made Artemia-based<br />

coral feeds in the near future.<br />

5.106<br />

Preliminary Results: Reproduction And Zooxanthellae Of millepora Platyphylla<br />

Alan DAVIS* 1<br />

1Kagman High School, Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands<br />

Millepora spp. hydrocorals initiate reproduction by liberating medusae that develop<br />

encapsulated in ampullae within the corallum; medusae spawn and die within hours.<br />

Zooxanthellae are acquired by eggs before medusae leave the colony. Reproductive state of<br />

Millepora platyphylla was studied sporadically from 1984 through 1986 on Guam, by<br />

monitoring presence of ampullae in collected hard parts. Tissue specimens were collected for<br />

light microscopical study, and embedded in paraffin.<br />

Medusae were released three or four days after Full Moon beginning in April in both 1985 and<br />

1986, followed by monthly liberation for some months. M. dichotoma began showed a similar<br />

pattern, albeit later in the summer, as M. platyphylla apparently wound down its season.<br />

Some days prior to liberation of medusae, reproducing colonies change to a marked darker<br />

brown color, and colonies’ surfaces are peppered with numerous minute white rings, evidence<br />

of decalicification of overburden of ampullae.<br />

Ordinary coccoid zooxanthellae stay near the tissue surface. Prior to liberation of medusae,<br />

certain structures appear to move through the coenosarc canals. It is proposed that these are<br />

zooxanthella swarmers, and suggested that as they move through basement layers they are able<br />

to enter the medusae and infect the egg: apparently the putative swarmers convert into coccoid<br />

zooxanthellae immediately, when they enter the medusae.<br />

These preliminary results suggest that linked sexual reproductive cycles are crucial to the<br />

vertical transmission of zooxanthellae in Millepora spp. Further research is demanded, to<br />

elucidate the details of these events. Individual cycles of both animal and plant demand to be<br />

carefully studied, and the nature of these complex interactions and such signals as enable the<br />

coordination of their life cycles. Subsidiary observations of Millepora platyphylla likewise<br />

highlight the importance of research on these key species.<br />

5.107<br />

Mechanisms Of Microhabitat Segregation Among Corallimorpharians: Evidence From<br />

Physiological Parameters Related To Photosynthesis And Host Cellular Response To<br />

Irradiance.<br />

Baraka KUGURU* 1 , Nanette E. Chadwick CHADWICK 2 , Yair ACHITUV 3 , Sophie DOVE 4 ,<br />

Ove HOEGH-GULDBERG 5 , Dan TCHERNOV 6<br />

1 Life Science, Interuniversity Institute for Marine Science, Eilat, Israel, 2 Biological Sciences,<br />

Auburn <strong>University</strong>, Auburn, AL, 3 The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences,<br />

Bar Ilan <strong>University</strong>, Tel aviv, Israel, 4 Centre for Marine Studies, <strong>University</strong> of Queensland,<br />

Australia, Australia, 5 Centre for Marine Studies, <strong>University</strong> of Queensland, Queensland,<br />

Australia, 6 Life science, Interuniversity Institute for Marine Science, Eilat, Israel<br />

Corallimorpharians are evolutionarily important relatives to stony corals, yet little is known<br />

about their ecophysiology. We show here that variation in the photoacclimation responses of<br />

some corallimorpharians explains in part their distribution and abundance on shallow reef flats.<br />

Our experimental exposure of corallimorpharians to the synergistic effects of UVR and PAR<br />

caused reduction of zooxanthella abundance, FV/Fm, and sigma values, while it caused an<br />

increase in QM, host cellular enzymatic activity (SOD), cellular degradation (LPO), MAAs, and<br />

GFPs. The corallimorpharian Rhodactis rhodostoma was physiologically less sensitive than<br />

Discosoma unguja when exposed to the synergistic effect of PAR and UVR. While our<br />

previous study showed that zooxanthellae in both host species photoprotected the host tissues<br />

from high light pressure by quenching the excitation energies through NPQ, the present study in<br />

addition, found that the host cells synthesized UVR absorbing compounds such as MAAs and<br />

GFPs, which functionally sun-protected the zooxanthellae. The R. rhodostoma host synthesized<br />

MAAs which absorb in the UVB range (300nm - 320nm), while D. unguja synthesized MAAs<br />

which absorb in the UVA range (320nm - 340nm), explaining in part why R. rhodostoma is able<br />

to acclimate better than D. unguja in shallow areas which are characterized by high UVB.<br />

Because some species are more affected than others by increased levels of ambient UVB<br />

radiation, significant changes in community structure are likely to occur in the near future on<br />

coral reefs.<br />

284

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!