11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Poster Mini-Symposium 5: Functional Biology of Corals and Coral Symbiosis: Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Physiology<br />
5.104<br />
Capacity For Plastic Growth Response Of porites Lobata in Fluctuating<br />
Temperature Regimes Varies Between Colonies<br />
Tyler WATERSON* 1 , Daniel BARSHIS 2 , Jonathon STILLMAN 3<br />
1 Marine Biology, Romberg Tiburon Center, San Francisco State <strong>University</strong>, Tiburon,<br />
CA, 2 Zoology, Hawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, Kaneohe, HI, 3 Biology, Romberg<br />
Tiburon Center, San Francisco State <strong>University</strong>, Tiburon, CA<br />
In the back reef lagoons of Ofu, American Samoa, corals thrive in temperatures (up to<br />
360C) higher than most corals can tolerate, and daily temperature fluctuates 2-40C<br />
depending on the size and flow of the pool. A reciprocal transplant study of two massive<br />
Porites species showed that corals from both forereef (constant temperature) and back<br />
reef environments grow more quickly in the back reef lagoon, although native back reef<br />
corals grow more quickly in all environments relative to conspecifics from the forereef.<br />
Here we examined whether these growth differences were due to temperature or other<br />
environmental factors, and whether growth responses were correlated with genotype. We<br />
collected samples of Porites lobata from forereef and back reef sites, with n=5 colonies<br />
per site and 25-30 replicates per colony. We transported the corals to our laboratory and<br />
split them between two tanks imitating either the forereef (290C) or back reef (fluctuating<br />
27-320C). After one month, new vertical tissue extension was measured. Both back reef<br />
and forereef corals had significantly higher tissue extension rates in the fluctuating tank<br />
than the constant-temperature tank, indicating phenotypic plasticity in growth in response<br />
to temperature. As in the field, back reef corals had significantly higher vertical tissue<br />
extension rates than forereef corals. However, colony-specific responses varied within<br />
each source environment. We hypothesize that this is an effect of host genetic<br />
polymorphism since no variation has been detected in the genotype of symbiodinium<br />
associated with P. lobata at this site (all colonies examined thus far host a similar strain<br />
of clade C). High genetic diversity has been seen in Porites species on this reef and we<br />
are currently examining the host genotype of the colonies studied using sequence<br />
homology of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nuclear ribosomal dna to<br />
compare growth responses with genotype.<br />
5.105<br />
Feeding Corals in Captivity: The Role Of Prey Type And Prey Concentration<br />
Ronald OSINGA* 1 , Tim WIJGERDE 1 , Fam CHARKO 1 , Johan VERRETH 1 , Dirk<br />
GRYMONPRE 2 , Silvia LAVORANO 3<br />
1 Wageningen <strong>University</strong>, Wageningen, Netherlands, 2 INVE BV, Dendermonde, Belgium,<br />
3 Acquario di Genova, Genova, Italy<br />
Corals feed heterotrophically to complement the nutrition they obtain through<br />
photosynthesis by zooxanthellae. Within the project CORALZOO (a collaboration<br />
between zoo’s and scientists), feeding efficiencies and growth rates of five species of<br />
corals are studied using different food types and concentrations. A protocol-template for<br />
feeding of corals in captivity will be deduced from the results.<br />
Colonies of the branching species S. caliendrum were used to study the uptake of live<br />
nauplii at different starting concentrations (1,000 – 20,0000 nauplii / l). Colonies of this<br />
species were incubated with nauplii in a mildly stirred, 1,5 l Perspex chamber. Uptake<br />
rates were remarkably high: a 14 ml coral colony could capture up to 10,000 nauplii<br />
within 15 minutes. At high starting concentrations, saturation occurred after 10 to 45<br />
minutes, while at lower starting concentrations, the incubation chamber was in most cases<br />
almost cleared of nauplii after 30 minutes.<br />
Long-term growth experiments with the branching coral Pocillopora damicornis showed<br />
that Artemia nauplii were a better food source than microalgae (Nannochloropsis sp.) and<br />
rotifers (Brachionis sp.). Most optimal was a (daily) start concentration of 2,000 nauplii<br />
per l.<br />
The boulder-shaped Galaxea fascicularis was used to test the ability of corals to capture<br />
four different Artemia-based feeds: live nauplii, dead (pasteurized) nauplii, Selcoenriched<br />
Instar II nauplii and Selco-enriched Instar II nauplii supplemented with a test<br />
compound. The corals preferred live over dead nauplii. Capture efficiency of Instar II<br />
nauplii was lower than for freshly hatched nauplii, but not significant when normalized to<br />
carbon content. Supplemented Instar II was captured with the same efficiency as nonsupplemented<br />
Instar II, which may enable development of tailor-made Artemia-based<br />
coral feeds in the near future.<br />
5.106<br />
Preliminary Results: Reproduction And Zooxanthellae Of millepora Platyphylla<br />
Alan DAVIS* 1<br />
1Kagman High School, Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands<br />
Millepora spp. hydrocorals initiate reproduction by liberating medusae that develop<br />
encapsulated in ampullae within the corallum; medusae spawn and die within hours.<br />
Zooxanthellae are acquired by eggs before medusae leave the colony. Reproductive state of<br />
Millepora platyphylla was studied sporadically from 1984 through 1986 on Guam, by<br />
monitoring presence of ampullae in collected hard parts. Tissue specimens were collected for<br />
light microscopical study, and embedded in paraffin.<br />
Medusae were released three or four days after Full Moon beginning in April in both 1985 and<br />
1986, followed by monthly liberation for some months. M. dichotoma began showed a similar<br />
pattern, albeit later in the summer, as M. platyphylla apparently wound down its season.<br />
Some days prior to liberation of medusae, reproducing colonies change to a marked darker<br />
brown color, and colonies’ surfaces are peppered with numerous minute white rings, evidence<br />
of decalicification of overburden of ampullae.<br />
Ordinary coccoid zooxanthellae stay near the tissue surface. Prior to liberation of medusae,<br />
certain structures appear to move through the coenosarc canals. It is proposed that these are<br />
zooxanthella swarmers, and suggested that as they move through basement layers they are able<br />
to enter the medusae and infect the egg: apparently the putative swarmers convert into coccoid<br />
zooxanthellae immediately, when they enter the medusae.<br />
These preliminary results suggest that linked sexual reproductive cycles are crucial to the<br />
vertical transmission of zooxanthellae in Millepora spp. Further research is demanded, to<br />
elucidate the details of these events. Individual cycles of both animal and plant demand to be<br />
carefully studied, and the nature of these complex interactions and such signals as enable the<br />
coordination of their life cycles. Subsidiary observations of Millepora platyphylla likewise<br />
highlight the importance of research on these key species.<br />
5.107<br />
Mechanisms Of Microhabitat Segregation Among Corallimorpharians: Evidence From<br />
Physiological Parameters Related To Photosynthesis And Host Cellular Response To<br />
Irradiance.<br />
Baraka KUGURU* 1 , Nanette E. Chadwick CHADWICK 2 , Yair ACHITUV 3 , Sophie DOVE 4 ,<br />
Ove HOEGH-GULDBERG 5 , Dan TCHERNOV 6<br />
1 Life Science, Interuniversity Institute for Marine Science, Eilat, Israel, 2 Biological Sciences,<br />
Auburn <strong>University</strong>, Auburn, AL, 3 The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences,<br />
Bar Ilan <strong>University</strong>, Tel aviv, Israel, 4 Centre for Marine Studies, <strong>University</strong> of Queensland,<br />
Australia, Australia, 5 Centre for Marine Studies, <strong>University</strong> of Queensland, Queensland,<br />
Australia, 6 Life science, Interuniversity Institute for Marine Science, Eilat, Israel<br />
Corallimorpharians are evolutionarily important relatives to stony corals, yet little is known<br />
about their ecophysiology. We show here that variation in the photoacclimation responses of<br />
some corallimorpharians explains in part their distribution and abundance on shallow reef flats.<br />
Our experimental exposure of corallimorpharians to the synergistic effects of UVR and PAR<br />
caused reduction of zooxanthella abundance, FV/Fm, and sigma values, while it caused an<br />
increase in QM, host cellular enzymatic activity (SOD), cellular degradation (LPO), MAAs, and<br />
GFPs. The corallimorpharian Rhodactis rhodostoma was physiologically less sensitive than<br />
Discosoma unguja when exposed to the synergistic effect of PAR and UVR. While our<br />
previous study showed that zooxanthellae in both host species photoprotected the host tissues<br />
from high light pressure by quenching the excitation energies through NPQ, the present study in<br />
addition, found that the host cells synthesized UVR absorbing compounds such as MAAs and<br />
GFPs, which functionally sun-protected the zooxanthellae. The R. rhodostoma host synthesized<br />
MAAs which absorb in the UVB range (300nm - 320nm), while D. unguja synthesized MAAs<br />
which absorb in the UVA range (320nm - 340nm), explaining in part why R. rhodostoma is able<br />
to acclimate better than D. unguja in shallow areas which are characterized by high UVB.<br />
Because some species are more affected than others by increased levels of ambient UVB<br />
radiation, significant changes in community structure are likely to occur in the near future on<br />
coral reefs.<br />
284