11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.3<br />
Environmental Effects On Back-Reef Sponge Distribution in The Florida Keys<br />
(Usa)<br />
Jeremy WEISZ* 1 , Mark BUTLER IV 1<br />
1 Dept. of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion <strong>University</strong>, Norfolk, VA<br />
Sponges are an abundant and conspicuous feature of back-reef hard-bottom environments<br />
in the Florida Keys (USA), where they often dominate the sessile animal biomass,<br />
provide shelter to other animals, and significantly alter planktonic communities and<br />
biogeochemical cycles through their filtering activities. Although predation and<br />
competition influence sponge community structure on coral reefs, these interactions<br />
cannot explain the distribution of sponges found in Florida’s back-reef environments.<br />
Environmental conditions in these habitats are influenced by water management<br />
strategies in the freshwater marshes of the Everglades, climatic conditions (e.g.,<br />
temperature, rainfall, wind), and coastal oceanography. As a consequence, salinity,<br />
nutrients, and plankton concentrations all vary dramatically. We therefore examined the<br />
implications of water quality on back-reef sponge community structure in two ways.<br />
First, in laboratory experiments we tested the tolerance of five prominent sponge species<br />
to salinities ranging from 15 psu to 45 psu during summer and winter temperatures. We<br />
then compared data on sponge distributions at 32 sites throughout the Florida Keys with<br />
water quality data from a water quality monitoring network (SERC) using canonical<br />
correspondence analysis (CCA). The mesocosm experiments showed that the golfball<br />
sponge, Cinachyra sp., tolerated the full range of salinities, whereas the other four<br />
species died at salinities above and below 35 psu at summer temperatures, and most died<br />
at salinities < 30 psu at winter temperatures. The CCA showed that some species, such<br />
as Ircinia variablis and Cinachyra sp., are “weedy” species, able to grow in most<br />
habitats, whereas others, such as Spongia graminea and Spongia barbara, are less<br />
tolerant of variable salinities and nutrient concentrations. These analyses suggest that<br />
local and global environmental changes will significantly impact the species distribution<br />
of sponges, with potentially drastic impacts on reef and other nearshore benthic<br />
communities in the Florida Keys.<br />
1.4<br />
Classifying Coralline Rubble Beaches in The British Virgin Islands<br />
Shannon GORE* 1 , J. A. G. COOPER 2<br />
1 Conservation & Fisheries, Government of the British Virgin Islands, Cruz Bay, Virgin<br />
Islands (U.S.), 2 School of Environmental Sciences, <strong>University</strong> of Ulster, Coleraine,<br />
United Kingdom<br />
More than 100 beaches in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) are composed of coarse coral<br />
reef rubble (coralline rubble). Descriptions of similar beaches elsewhere in the Caribbean<br />
and Pacific focus on their deposition during storm or tsunami events in which coralline<br />
rubble is transported onshore to create ridges, and over time, ridge complexes.<br />
Observations in the BVI indicate that coralline rubble beaches occur in a variety of<br />
settings and vary in morphology and composition. In this paper a preliminary<br />
classification scheme is presented based on the attributes of 50 coralline rubble beaches<br />
in the BVI.<br />
Methods involved mapping the distribution of coralline rubble beaches throughout the<br />
BVI and as describing the following six factors that potentially influence the morphology<br />
of these beaches: 1) Clast size of coral debris (smaller Porites ssp. vs. larger Diplora ssp.<br />
and A palmata); 2) Orientation of the beach to offshore reef types (fringing, patch,<br />
barrier); 3) Offshore bathymetry (steep beachface vs. carbonate platform); 4) Prevailing<br />
wave approach direction (onshore vs. longshore); 5) Amount of accommodation space<br />
available (behind and adjacent to the beach)); 6) type of barrier (single, prograded,<br />
overwash, etc). Multivariate statistics were then used to classify each beach and<br />
determine the importance of each of the variables on coralline rubble beach form.<br />
Poster Mini-Symposium 1: Lessons from the Past<br />
1.5<br />
Results Of Long-Term Bioersion Study, Belize Patch Reefs<br />
Halard LESCINSKY* 1 , Maxwell HILL 1 , Ann HOEDT 1<br />
1 Life and Earth Sciences, Otterbein College, Westerville, OH<br />
Bioerosion rates of branching corals were tracked for up to 8 years on patch reefs in central<br />
Belize using natural and experimental substrates. Bleaching induced mortality in 1998<br />
provided the start of a natural experiment in which Acropora cervicornis and Agaricia<br />
tenuifolia skeletons were collected at 1-2 year intervals for 8 years. In addition, experimental<br />
substrates (conch shells) deployed along a depth gradient (1-15m) were retrieved at 1, 3, and 5<br />
year intervals. Macroboring bioerosion rates were initially highly linear (8%/yr), and inversely<br />
related to depth. After 3 years macroboring bioerosion slowed and all substrates tended<br />
towards a maximum bioerosion intensity of approximately 35%. This threshold value may<br />
reflect the maximum gallery density for Cliona or the collapse and disappearance of more<br />
highly bored substrates. Over the same intervals, substrates were widely encrusted by coralline<br />
algae and there was little loss of corallite surface topography suggesting that scraping<br />
bioerosion was negligible on branching corals and rubble. These results highlight the<br />
importance of boring over grazing for some reef habitats, and for some types of substrates.<br />
While previous studies, primarily in the Pacific, have proposed that grazing bioerosion is<br />
generally an order of magnitude or more greater than macroboring, this is probably not the case<br />
for branching corals and carbonate rubble, two of the most rapidly produced substrates on the<br />
reef. It is also possible that Caribbean bioerosion differs significantly from Pacific bioerosion<br />
because of the loss of grazing Diadema, and the absence of the deepest excavating parrotfish.<br />
1.6<br />
Reef Sedimentation Patterns, Southwestern Shelf of Puerto Rico<br />
Raquel HERNANDEZ* 1 , Clark SHERMAN 1 , Ernesto WEIL 1<br />
1 <strong>University</strong> of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez, Lajas, Puerto Rico<br />
Effects of terrigenous sedimentation are considered a serious threat to Puerto Rico’s coral reefs.<br />
This study assesses: 1) the composition of sediments accumulating at reef sites; 2) the spatial<br />
extent to which terrigenous materials are reaching the reefs off of La Parguera’s coast; 3) the<br />
spatial variability of sediment composition, size and sedimentation rates at La Parguera; and 4)<br />
the temporal variability of sediment composition, size and sedimentation rates at La Parguera.<br />
Sediment traps were deployed at 9 sites from inner shelf to shelf edge. Mineralogy was<br />
determined by X-Ray diffraction. Bulk carbon composition was determined by carbon<br />
coulometry, specifying: relative weight percent calcium carbonate (in situ production), relative<br />
weight percent organic material, and relative weight percent other material. Environmental<br />
factors influencing sedimentation are addressed, such as precipitation, wind speed, and passage<br />
of tropical storms.<br />
X-ray diffraction analyses indicate that sediments consist primarily of magnesian calcite and<br />
aragonite, both produced in situ, as well as smaller quantities of clay minerals and quartz, i.e.<br />
terrigenous origin. Analyses of total sediment weight (April 2006 - April 2007) show a similar<br />
temporal pattern at all sites where June, July and August have the highest sedimentation rates.<br />
Carbon composition analyses indicate a consistently higher percentage of terrigenous material<br />
in the fine fraction (