11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.17<br />
Carysfort Reef, Key Largo, Florida Keys Is Melting<br />
Phillip DUSTAN* 1<br />
1 Department of Biology, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC<br />
The latest reports on the state of the world’s coral reefs are tragic. At least one quarter of<br />
known reefs are in seriously degraded and over half are seriously threatened.<br />
Photographs, taken from the same vantage point from 1975 to 2004, illustrate the rapid<br />
degradation of coral reefs that has occurred throughout the Florida Keys and Caribbean<br />
Sea. Carysfort Reef, once the largest, most diverse and luxuriant reef in the Florida<br />
Keys, has lost over 92% of its living coral cover. The factors responsible for this<br />
degradation include an accumulation of simultaneous, synergistic, nested stresses<br />
operating at local to global scales (fishing, anchor/grounding damage, watershed effluents<br />
from urban, agriculture, and industry; global warming and ocean acidification). While<br />
this complex milieu makes it extremely difficult to determine the contribution of each<br />
stressor, the impact has been catastrophic.<br />
In 1975 the Acropora palmate zone consisted of large colonies oriented into the<br />
prevailing seas, typical throughout the Caribbean. The high degree of three dimensional<br />
complexity provided habitat for a wide variety of reef fishes and invertebrates. By 1985,<br />
some of the A. palmata colonies had suffered physical damage from boat groundings and<br />
storms. Large fragments were strewn about and decreased urchin grazing allowed for<br />
increased growth of macroalgal turf communities. In 1995, the reef structure continued<br />
to degrade, coral cover was below 5%, and scleractinain corals ceased providing any<br />
significant contribution to reef framework. By 2004, bioerosion had dramatically<br />
reduced the reef’s three-dimensionality and softly rounded the remaining rubble<br />
fragments. Dead skeletons of the once dominant Elkhorn coral appear to be melting as<br />
they are rapidly converted to carbonate sand. Observations based on the remnants of<br />
cement bore-hole fillings suggest that rates of bioerosion match or exceed rates of past<br />
skeletal growth, but in the opposite direction.<br />
1.18<br />
The Effect Of Marine Protection On Carbonate Sediment Production in St. Croix,<br />
Usvi<br />
Alex BURPEE* 1 , Lisa GREER 1 , Robert HUMSTON 2 , Dennis HUBBARD 3<br />
1 Geology, Washington and Lee <strong>University</strong>, Lexington, VA, 2 Biology, Virginia Military<br />
Instiute, Lexington, VA, 3 Geology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH<br />
Previous research has shown that marine preserves contain greater densities of predators,<br />
parrotfish, and live coral than unprotected reefs, as well as decreased densities of algae.<br />
These biological differences associated with reef protection affect carbonate sediment<br />
production on a reef by altering the relative densities of grazers present (parrotfish and<br />
Diadema antillarum), as well as the balance of coral and algal cover. However, it is not<br />
generally understood how altering the two grazer populations might affect sediment<br />
production by bioerosion. In St. Croix, a protected site at Buck Island (BI) and an<br />
unprotected site at Tague Bay (TB) were used as study areas to explore the effect of coral<br />
reef management on the reef carbonate budget. The sites sit on opposite sides of a<br />
channel and are separated by only 5 km. Duplicate 10-minute predator and grazer counts<br />
were compiled along two 10 m transects at 7.5 m, 4.5 m, and 2 m depths for each of the 3<br />
locations at both BI and TB. The primary bioeroders included 7 species of parrotfish,<br />
and Diadema antillarum. Survey data show statistically significant differences in grazer<br />
densities between the two sites (2,286 parrotfish and 400 Diadema at BI versus 1,507<br />
parrotfish and 3,123 Diadema at TB). Although the grazer populations are very different,<br />
initial analyses based on previous estimates of sediment production by individual fish and<br />
urchins show that the difference in sediment production caused by these grazers is not as<br />
different. Efforts are ongoing to determine how present-day sediment production rates at<br />
the two sites compare to those associated with the reefs prior to their degradation by<br />
fishing, disease, hurricane stress, and nutrification. Hopefully these will allow us to<br />
compare patterns of carbonate cycling in pre- and post-decline reefs to fossil reefs.<br />
Poster Mini-Symposium 1: Lessons from the Past<br />
1.19<br />
A Possible Epibiont Signature for White Band Disease and/or Bleaching in Acropora<br />
palmata, Buck Island National Monument, St. Croix, USVI<br />
Anne LAGOMARCINO* 1 , Dennis HUBBARD 1<br />
1 Geology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH<br />
The role of poster-child for recent reef decline is shared by White Band Disease and bleaching.<br />
Monitoring has documented the catastrophic decline of Acropora palmata and numerous other<br />
species, but is an ineffective way to understand change in the context of longer-term community<br />
turnover. With A. palmata, both stressors share one important characteristic that separates them<br />
from the common and presumably "natural" cause of death. Storm action reduces colonies to<br />
rubble that either recruits asexually or dies and is bound into the substrate. In contrast, disease<br />
and bleaching leave the colony standing and subject to increased grazing and encrustation. Over<br />
150 colonies of standing, dead colonies of A. palmata were collected from two sites off Buck<br />
Island, where White Band Disease was first described. At the same sites, samples were<br />
recovered from 1-2 meter deep pits that were dominated by broken, toppled and encrusted<br />
branches. As a pilot study, a subset of 15 "standing-dead" and 15 "pit" samples were chosen<br />
randomly from the larger group at one site. Each was impregnated with epoxy, slabbed and cut<br />
into large-format thin sections. The relative importance and order of ebibionts were quantified<br />
along ten randomly chosen transects on each slide. Cluster analysis and Bray-Curtis ordination<br />
revealed two clusters that separate standing-dead and pit samples. Within these clusters, thick<br />
and conformable coralline algae, vermetid gastropods and worm tubes were statistically more<br />
abundant on the standing dead colonies (α = 0.05), while Carpenteria utricularis, Biarritzina<br />
carpenteriaeformis and high-relief morphs of Homotrema rubrum were more common within<br />
the pits. While this is only a subset and we still have to examine our reef cores in the intervals<br />
where A. palmata apparently had difficulty in the past, the differences described here involve<br />
easily distinguished organisms that have a high potential for preservation in cores and<br />
Quaternary outcrops.<br />
1.2<br />
Results of Scleractinian and Reef Investigation Conducted 1983-1984 in <strong>Southeastern</strong><br />
Mexico<br />
Vassil ZLATARSKI* 1<br />
1 Independent Consultant, Bristol, RI<br />
From 1983 to1984, the Center for Advanced Studies and Research in Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico<br />
(CINVESTAV-Unidad Mérida) conducted an extensive study of scleractinians in southeastern<br />
Mexico. The results were not published. The aim of this work is to preserve the unique<br />
information of two dozen years ago regarding species richness, community data and the<br />
scleractinian role in building different reef types and to make it available for better reef<br />
understanding and preservation.<br />
The area of investigation included waters all around the peninsula of Yucatán, from Cayos<br />
Arcas to the border of Belize. Scleractinians were the object of day and night scuba diving,<br />
from the coast to a depth of 60 m on the shelf edge, in transects with 141 sites and 168 stations.<br />
4, 579 coralla were collected and identified. 630 color pictures were taken, from which 231<br />
were selected for an atlas. In 1985, CINVESTAV donated 801 coralla to the Smithsonian<br />
Institution in Washington, D.C., and these remain well preserved. With the exception of three<br />
azooxanthellate species identified by Dr. S. Cairns, the rest were identified by the author. The<br />
species presence and their participation in reef formation were given for each site and station.<br />
In total 42 species and one hybrid of 27 scleractinian genera were determined and four reef<br />
types were established.<br />
In 1983-84, the severe negative impact of oil exploitation was evident in Cayos Arcas.<br />
Poorly conducted tourism and fishing damaged the reefs in Cozumel, Punta Brava and Isla<br />
Mujeres. Scleractinian health did not show significant anomalies. No epizootic phenomena<br />
were established. Recruits frequented non-damaged locations.<br />
The results offer a quarter-century baseline for prognosis and recommendations concerning<br />
reefs in southeastern Mexico.<br />
263