24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Oral Mini-Symposium 26: Biodiversity and Diversification of Reef Organisms<br />

26-33<br />

Phylogeny of Faviidae Corals Based on Molecular and Morphological Data<br />

Danwei HUANG* 1 , Rudolf MEIER 2 , Peter A. TODD 2 , Hironobu FUKAMI 3 , Loke Ming<br />

CHOU 2<br />

1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, 2 National <strong>University</strong> of Singapore,<br />

Singapore, Singapore, 3 Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, Wakayama, Japan<br />

Corals in the family Faviidae constitute one of the most important taxa of hermatypic<br />

corals in Indo-Pacific reefs. Several genera in this group are taxonomically difficult and<br />

little is known about the phylogenetic relationships at the species level. In order to<br />

reconstruct the evolutionary relationships within this family, 42 faviid species were<br />

sequenced for two mitochondrial genes (cytochrome oxidase subunit I and a<br />

mitochondrial non-coding region). Based on these genes and 18 morphological<br />

characters, including morphometric measurements, we present the first species-level<br />

phylogeny of the family. Maximum parsimony analysis was carried out separately on the<br />

molecular and morphological data using both dynamic (optimization alignment) and<br />

static homology (ClustalX). The datasets were also combined and analyzed under<br />

parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian likelihood. Analyses based on both data<br />

types did not recover traditional taxonomic classification. Of the eight genera with more<br />

than one species examined using molecular data, only two are monophyletic (i.e.<br />

Cyphastrea and Platygyra). Furthermore, the outgroup Scapophyllia cylindrica<br />

(Family Merulinidae) is deeply nested within the Faviidae, while the Indo-Pacific<br />

Montastraea spp. are clearly distinct from the Atlantic M. annularis complex. Our<br />

data support the hypothesis that some congeneric species that span both marine provinces<br />

are less closely related to one another than to taxa from other families. Reconstructions<br />

based on DNA sequence data and morphological characters are also incongruent. We<br />

discuss the implications of our results for the evolution of Scleractinia and highlight the<br />

significance of our findings for biodiversity estimates and reef management.<br />

26-34<br />

Reconciling Morphologic And Molecular Data: Corallite Wall And Microstructures<br />

Of Radial Elements In The Scleractinian Coral Family Faviidae<br />

Ann BUDD* 1 , Jaroslaw STOLARSKI 2<br />

1 <strong>University</strong> of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 2 Instytut Paleobiologii PAN, Warszawa, Poland<br />

Recent molecular-based phylogenies conflict with traditional scleractinian classsification<br />

at ranks ranging from suborder to genus, challenging morphologists to discover new<br />

characters that better agree with molecular data. Such characters are essential for<br />

including fossils in analyses and tracing evolutionary patterns through geologic time. We<br />

examine the internal structure of the corallite wall and associated costosepta, focusing on<br />

arrangements of calcification centers and fibers in transverse thin section. The taxa are a<br />

molecular (cytB, COI) clade consisting of: (a) Pacific members of 12 genera<br />

(Barabattoia, Caulastraea, Cyphastrea, Echinopora, Favia, Favites, Goniastrea,<br />

Leptoria, Montastraea, Oulophyllia, Platygyra, Scapophyllia) and one Atlantic taxon (M.<br />

annularis complex) in the traditional family Faviidae; (b) five genera (Hydnophora,<br />

Merulina; Pectinia, Mycedium; Trachyphyllia) in three allied families. For comparison,<br />

we treat two Pacific (Diploastrea, Plesiastrea) and three Atlantic (Colpophyllia,<br />

Diploria, Manicina) genera that have traditionally been assigned to the Faviidae but do<br />

not belong to the clade. Our observations reveal that members of the clade possess two<br />

commonly recognized wall types: parathecal (formed by dissepiments) and septothecal<br />

(formed by septal thickening). They also possess a third wall type, trabeculothecal<br />

(formed by trabecular elements), as well as combinations of wall types. Costosepta<br />

consist of: (a) distinct vertical units with central calcification centers, (b) fibers radiating<br />

from a well-defined medial septal line, lacking well-defined centers, (c) fibers radiating<br />

from a poorly-defined mid-septum line, with well-defined centers. The effectiveness of<br />

the new microstructural characters as phylogenetic markers is evaluated by mapping their<br />

states onto the molecular tree using parsimony, and calculating tree statistics. Although<br />

maps of traditional macromorphological characters have low consistency indices, maps<br />

of the new characters have higher consistency indices, reveal less homoplasy, and are<br />

diagnostic of subclades within the group. Phylogenetic trees constructed using the new<br />

characters have relatively high bootstrap support, and are congruent with molecular trees.<br />

26-35<br />

Resolving The Taxonomy Of Favia Corals From Thai Waters Using Morphological And<br />

Molecular Data<br />

Narinratana KONGJANDTRE* 1 , Mauricio RODRIGUEZ-LANETTY RODRIGUEZ-<br />

LANETTY 1 , Tyrone RIDGWAY 1 , Ove HOEGH-GULDBERG 1<br />

1 Centre for Marine Studies, The <strong>University</strong> of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia<br />

Traditional taxonomy and systematics is central to our understanding of the biodiversity of<br />

ecosystems such as coral reefs. This role has become more important as coral reefs worldwide<br />

have begun to be influenced by the activities of humans such that, despite their persistence in<br />

geological time, coral reefs have begun an unprecedented decline in abundance and community<br />

composition. Given the potential losses to coral reefs due to disturbance and climate change, the<br />

need for knowing what is being lost (i.e. via effective taxonomy) cannot be underestimated. The<br />

Faviidae are one of the most prominent coral families inhabiting tropical reefs, yet despite their<br />

prominence, their taxonomy still remains largely unresolved. Thailand, being within the coral<br />

biodiversity hot spot, and its association with both the Indian and Pacific Oceans, makes it an<br />

ideal location to unravel the potentially complex taxonomy and systematic relationships within<br />

the Faviidae. Using a unique multi-disciplinary approach to taxonomy whereby morphological<br />

and genetic techniques are integrated, we unravel the diversity currently represented by the<br />

genus Favia in Thailand. Multi-character measurements and 3-D Cartesian coordinate analysis<br />

were used to delineate species boundaries based on skeletal characters. This morphological<br />

approach was extended using sequence analysis of the mtDNA and the complete Internal<br />

Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region to detect taxon boundaries in 114 samples of Favia from<br />

Thailand. In addition, the molecular diversity of symbiotic dinoflagellates associated with Favia<br />

samples were also examined as a possible additional character state to the taxonomic resolution.<br />

Preliminary results support this multi-disciplinary approach as being very robust for<br />

scleractinian coral taxonomy.<br />

26-36<br />

From Molecular “markers” To Molecular “drivers”: Coral Systematics Using<br />

Biomineralization Genes As Determinants Of Skeletal Morphology<br />

Herman WIRSHING* 1 , Andrew BAKER 1<br />

1 Marine Biology and Fisheries, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science,<br />

<strong>University</strong> of Miami, Miami, FL<br />

Molecular systematics assumes that variation in DNA sequences at one or more genetic loci can<br />

serve as useful indicators of evolutionary change. These molecular “markers” serve as proxies<br />

for estimating relationships within and between taxonomic groups, and are usually compared<br />

with classical systematic relationships that are based on morphological differences among taxa.<br />

Often, molecular and morphological datasets do not agree, because one dataset (or both) fails to<br />

accurately reflect true phylogenetic relationships. One way of resolving the disagreement<br />

between these datasets is to identify and analyze genes directly responsible for generating<br />

morphology. For most taxonomic groups this is not currently possible. However, in corals,<br />

where taxonomy is currently determined almost exclusively by skeletal morphology, this<br />

problem may be tractable, and may also help identify cases of convergent morphological<br />

evolution. To test this approach, we used the cDNA sequence of a protein isolated from the<br />

organic matrix (a consortium of proteins that forms the scaffolding for biomineralized<br />

structures) of Galaxea fascicularis, to amplify a 210bp DNA fragment from eight<br />

scleractinian species. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the translated amino acid sequences<br />

grouped these species according to corallite morphology. Three genera that resemble each other<br />

in calyx morphology formed a well-supported clade - Galaxea, Euphyllia (which contain<br />

phaceloid calyces), and Gyrosmillia (meandroid calyces). The other two genera exhibit calyx<br />

morphologies not shared by the other taxa and formed individual lineages - Siderastrea<br />

(cerioid calyces) and Montipora (plocoid calyces). This novel approach may provide an<br />

opportunity to refine our understanding of the genetic underpinnings of conventional<br />

morphological taxonomy, and may help resolve some persistent problems in coral systematics.<br />

250

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!