24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Oral Mini-Symposium 25: Predicting Reef Futures in the Context of Climate Change<br />

25-25<br />

Can Scleractinians Take Up Exogenous Symbionts After A Bleaching Event?<br />

Mary Alice COFFROTH* 1 , Eleni PETROU 2 , Daniel POLAND 2 , Lyndsey HOLLAND 1<br />

1 Geology, <strong>University</strong> at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 2 Biology, <strong>University</strong> at Buffalo, Buffalo,<br />

NY<br />

With reports of coral bleaching on the rise, it is ever more important to understand how<br />

corals will respond to bleaching events and to assess their ability to recover. One large<br />

unknown is the manner in which bleached corals recover their symbiont populations.<br />

Can corals acquire zooxanthellae from the environment or is recovery dependent on<br />

surviving in hospite symbionts? Acquisition of symbionts from the environment could<br />

be an important mechanism for acclimatization to an altered environment. We examined<br />

the ability of Porites divaricata, a scleractinian coral found throughout the Caribbean,<br />

to secondarily acquire algal symbionts after an experimentally induced bleaching event.<br />

Porites divaricata colonies in the Florida Keys typically harbor Symbiodinium B170<br />

(based on sequence variation in the chloroplast 23S rDNA). Using elevated temperature,<br />

colonies of P. divaricata were induced to bleach and then exposed to Symbiodinium<br />

strains not typically found in the adult host (Symbiodinium strains A198, B211, B 224<br />

and D206). At 19 d and 38 d after exposure to the atypical strain, most of the colonies<br />

only harbored the symbiont type originally found in the host prior to bleaching (i.e.<br />

B170). However, after 19d all colonies exposed to strain B224 harbored the non-native<br />

strain in addition to the strain normally found in P. divaricata (B170). In the other<br />

treatments, the inoculated strain was only rarely detected (7% of samples). This suggests<br />

that corals may secondarily obtain new symbionts from the environment, but like the<br />

primary infection, host-symbiont specificity restricts the plasticity of the symbiosis.<br />

25-26<br />

Environmental Controls on the Establishment and Development of Symbiosis in<br />

Corals<br />

Vivian CUMBO* 1 , Andrew BAIRD 2 , M.H. VAN OPPEN 3<br />

1 School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Townsville, Australia,<br />

2 ACR Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Townsville,<br />

Australia, 3 Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia<br />

The initial establishment of symbiosis is critical for coral that acquire their zooxanthellae<br />

via horizontal transmission because it gives them an opportunity to associate with<br />

different, more beneficial strains of zooxanthellae. Corals can associate with many<br />

different species of zooxanthellae, some which are more tolerant of high temperature.<br />

Consequently, one possible way for corals to cope with projected increases in sea surface<br />

temperature attributed to global warming is to initially associate with heat tolerant<br />

symbionts. This study tested this mechanism by determining whether environmental<br />

conditions affect the establishment and development of symbiosis for the coral, Acropora<br />

monticulosa. Coral larvae were exposed to 25, 28 or 31°C and given either Symbiodinium<br />

clades A, C or D. Some strains of Symbiodinium clade D are known to be heat tolerant,<br />

while clade C is generally considered heat sensitive. Symbiosis was established with all<br />

clades of zooxanthellae under every temperature treatment. The proportion of larvae<br />

infected with clade C decreased as temperatures increased, while the proportion of larvae<br />

infected with clade A peaked at 28°C then decreased. In contrast, the proportion of larvae<br />

infected with clade D increased as temperature increased. Additionally, the density of<br />

zooxanthellae within the larvae decreased significantly for clade A and C but increased<br />

for clade D as temperature increased. These results suggest that as seawater temperatures<br />

increase, the coral host may be able to shift to more heat tolerant clades of zooxanthellae<br />

and potentially aid coral’s ability to cope with global warming.<br />

25-27<br />

My Name Is Legion, For We Are Many: The Ecological And Evolutionary<br />

Significance Of Population Structure in Symbiotic Dinoflagellates (symbiodinium,<br />

Dinophyta)<br />

Scott R. SANTOS* 1<br />

1 Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn <strong>University</strong>, Auburn, AL<br />

Symbiodinium represents a genus of unicellular dinoflagellate symbionts that associate with a<br />

variety of marine protists and invertebrates. Over the last 15 years, eight divergent clades,<br />

designated A to H, with numerous subcladal “types” comprising each lineage, have been<br />

recognized within the genus. Although the diversity and phylogenetics of the Symbiodinium<br />

complex is now well established, there has been surprisingly few data on fine-scale population<br />

structure and biogeography in these dinoflagellate symbionts. Since populations represent the<br />

fundamental unit of evolution, understanding patterns and processes at this level is paramount<br />

toward furthering our knowledge on the basic biology of Symbiodinium as well as how<br />

anthropogenic-driven global climate change may impact these symbionts and their host<br />

associations. Here, I present a synopsis of population-level characteristics for Symbiodinium<br />

distilled from published and unpublished data. These include: 1) the symbiont population of a<br />

host is typically comprised of a multitude of individuals belonging to a single genetic entity or<br />

clone; 2) for a given host species, the majority of individuals at a site harbor an identical<br />

Symbiodinium clone, indicating low symbiont population diversity per host species per site; 3)<br />

strong genetic structure is common between symbiont populations of a host species across sites,<br />

suggesting low genetic connectivity between populations due to poor dispersal capability of<br />

clones, and; 4) all clones associating with a particular host species over a widespread<br />

geographic range belong to the same phylogenetic “species”, implying high specificity in the<br />

pairing of host species and Symbiodinium. By unifying these characteristics in a single<br />

framework, a series of hypotheses, testable via experiments and/or modeling, are synthesized<br />

regarding the ecology and evolution of Symbiodinium and their important symbiotic<br />

associations.<br />

25-28<br />

Coral Holobiont Community Structure: How Much Have We Missed By Focusing Only in<br />

The Coral Host?<br />

Juan ORTIZ* 1 , Maria GOMEZ CABRERA 1<br />

1 Centre for Marine Studies, The <strong>University</strong> of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia<br />

Coral community structure has been studied in depth for the past fifty years. However, the<br />

identity of symbiotic dinoflagellates that live within the coral colonies, their life-history, and<br />

specificity to different hosts is poorly understood. While the number of identified symbiont<br />

types increases, we are left with the task of recognizing functional differences between these<br />

groups. Several studies have established the symbiont community structure in individual coral<br />

colonies, but little is known about how we should interpret the role of the symbiotic<br />

dinoflagellate communities in the ecosystem. The aims of this study is: To quantify the<br />

contribution of the symbiont identification to the community response to environmental<br />

variables by comparing the response of the coral host community structure and the holobiont<br />

community structure to the same environmental gradient. The coral community structure and<br />

the symbiont community structure were studied in 5 coves with different environmental<br />

conditions along the central coast of Venezuela using photo-transects and ITS2 to identified<br />

symbionts. 77 % of the variability of the coral community structure can be explain by distance<br />

from the closest reef, while 92% of the variability in holobiont community structure can be<br />

explain by a combination of 4 environmental variables. The 15% increases in the proportion of<br />

the variability explained by the environmental variables is the contribution of the symbiont<br />

identity in the model. Following this analysis a holobiont niche segregation was evident having<br />

different hots-simbiont combinations associated to different environmental conditions. This<br />

study shows quantitatively for the first time how much information can be gain by including the<br />

symbiont ID in classical coral community ecology, demonstrating that the study of coral<br />

holobiont community structure is the natural next steep forward in the study of changes in coral<br />

communities.<br />

234

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!