24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1-29<br />

Evolution Of The Coral Reef Ecosystem Under A Jurassic Perspective: From<br />

Mixotrophy Towards Superoligotrophy<br />

Reinhold LEINFELDER* 1 , Ulrich STRUCK 1<br />

1 Museum of Natural History Berlin, Berlin, Germany<br />

Scleractinian reefs rapidly evolved and expanded during the Jurassic. Many Jurassic<br />

scleractinian calical structures were nearly as complex as in modern star or brain corals<br />

and thus appear modern. However, a much greater variety of coral reef types and coral<br />

reef settings existed than today. During the Jurassic, the adaptation to nutrient restriction<br />

by photosymbiosis was only one of several adaptational strategies, including other<br />

adaptational pathways to terrigeneous and even brackish settings. Many mid and late<br />

Jurassic corals exhibit good indicators for the existence of photosymbionts (integrated<br />

calical growth shapes, depth zonation, typical growth banding with high and low-density<br />

bands and, in some examples, non-linear clustering of C/O stable isotopes). Nevertheless,<br />

even density-banded corals and most pure coral reefs mostly grew under terrigeneous<br />

influence. On the other hand, typical low-nutrient settings such as the 1000 km broad<br />

Arabian shelf or intra-tethydian platforms were dominated by stromatoporoid sponges<br />

with or without scleractinian corals. Taxa distribution shows provincialism of many<br />

stromatoporoids. Jurassic coral taxa distribution data are not yet statistically significant<br />

but also point to differences between near-coast and intra-ocean platforms, indicative of<br />

splitting of the coral reef window into a mesotrophic to mildly oligotrophic subset<br />

dominated by mixotrophic corals and a superoligotrophic subset dominated by<br />

stromatoporoids together with strongly photosymbiontic corals.<br />

The Bahia Almirante coral reefs from Panama may represent a “Jurassic-type” modern<br />

example for mixotrophy of corals. These reefs are adapted to both reduced salinity and to<br />

sewage-related, slightly elevated nutrients. This is shown by the C/O and N stable isotope<br />

pattern, signalling that certain phototrophic coral species consumed considerable<br />

proportions of zooplankton and, possibly, even terrigeneous plant debris.<br />

1-30<br />

Co2-Concentrating Mechanisms, Harmful Blooms, And Late Devonian Reef<br />

Extinction 375 Million Years Ago<br />

Robert RIDING* 1<br />

1 Earth and Planetary Sciences, <strong>University</strong> of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN<br />

Late Devonian Mass Extinction caused the largest change experienced by reef biotas in the<br />

entire Phanerozoic. Stromatoporoid-coral communities that had dominated metazoan reefs since<br />

the mid-Ordovician disappeared. In the extinction’s immediate aftermath they were replaced by<br />

microbial reefs. By the Early Mississippian rimmed shelves had given way to ramps dominated<br />

by carbonate mud mounds. The Mass Extinction selectively eliminated shallow marine<br />

organisms, including acritarch phytoplankton as well as reef biotas.<br />

Here I suggest induction of CO 2-concentrating mechanisms (CCMs) in marine phytoplankton as<br />

a factor in Late Devonian Mass Extinction. CCMs help maintain photosynthesis when levels of<br />

dissolved inorganic carbon are low. Late Devonian decline in atmospheric CO 2 level was<br />

sufficient to induce CCMs in aquatic algae and cyanobacteria. This is likely to have had several<br />

geologically recognizable effects. Firstly, CCMs promote phytoplankton productivity and bloom<br />

conditions by helping to overcome carbon limitation. Productivity enhances organic matter<br />

burial, and harmful blooms kill shallow-water reefs and pelagic organisms. Secondly, conditions<br />

favouring photosynthetic groups with effective CCMs can promote community restructuring,<br />

resulting in extinction of some phytoplankton groups. Thirdly, cyanobacterial CCMs can<br />

stimulate calcification, both in the water column as ‘whitings’, and in benthic mats as in situ<br />

microbial carbonates.<br />

The Late Devonian marine realm underwent marked changes in addition to Mass Extinction.<br />

Organic carbon-rich sediments, microbial carbonates, and carbonate mud mounds significantly<br />

increased in abundance. These, at first sight disparate, developments all have potential links to<br />

CCM induction in phytoplankton. Harmful blooms could have contributed to extinction of<br />

shallow marine metazoans, and increased phytoplankton productivity would have increased<br />

organic carbon-rich sediments. Phytoplankton community restructuring could have led to<br />

acritarch extinction. Combination of increased microbial productivity and enhanced<br />

cyanobacterial calcification would have promoted both microbial carbonate and carbonate mud<br />

mound development. These possibilities do not exclude the likely involvement of additional<br />

causative factors.<br />

Oral Mini-Symposium 1: Lessons From the Past<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!