11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
24-17<br />
Coral Community Restorations Following Vessel Groundings in Broward County,<br />
Florida: A Review Of Efforts And Future Needs<br />
Bruce GRAHAM 1 , Erin HODEL* 1 , Anne MCCARTHY 1<br />
1 CSA International, Inc., Stuart, FL<br />
Frequent vessel groundings have impacted coral communities offshore Broward County,<br />
Florida, causing structural and biological impacts of variable severity and areal extent.<br />
To accelerate natural recovery processes of damaged habitat, CSA International, Inc.<br />
(CSA) has conducted restoration following six of these groundings. Restoration included<br />
reattachment of displaced and fractured biota, re-establishment of structural complexity,<br />
rubble stabilization, and removal of material that may impede natural recovery. In total,<br />
over 2,000 scleractinian corals, gorgonians, and sponges were reattached, and<br />
approximately 147 tons of rubble were stabilized to restore the three-dimensionality of<br />
the habitat. Post-restoration monitoring has only been conducted at several restoration<br />
sites. CSA conducted monitoring of re-attached coral colonies, coral recruitment, and<br />
other epibenthos at multiple-year intervals after restoration of the M/V Firat grounding.<br />
Monitoring of epibenthos and ichthyofauna was performed 6 months after restoration of<br />
the M/V Eastwind grounding. Together, these data indicate high survivorship of<br />
reattached biota (≥90%), successful recruitment of corals and other epibenthos to restored<br />
substrates, and re-established abundances of reef fishes. Furthermore, CSA has tagged<br />
and mapped over 1,000 biotal specimens and conducted baseline biological surveys from<br />
the six restoration sites to facilitate potential monitoring. Future monitoring of biotal<br />
reattachment success and health, coral recruitment and survivorship, succession of<br />
epibenthos, and reef-fish assemblages at these restoration sites would greatly benefit<br />
evaluation of their long-term success. These restorations offer a unique opportunity to<br />
examine biotal succession and recovery times of coral communities following vessel<br />
groundings in southeast Florida. CSA is currently seeking means to continue monitoring<br />
these restoration sites to evaluate their long-term success and gather data to support<br />
future decision-making about restoration actions and inputs into Habitat Equivalency<br />
Analyses, an important tool in determining lost ecological services.<br />
24-18<br />
Large Coral Transplantation in Bal Haf (Yemen): An Opportunity To Save Corals<br />
During The Construction Of A Liquiefied Natural Gas Plant Using Innovative<br />
Techniques<br />
Olivier LE BRUN* 1 , Eric DUTRIEUX 2 , Fannie SEGUIN 3 , Robert HIRST 4 , Ibrahim<br />
AL-THARY 4,5<br />
1 CREOCEAN, LA SEYNE SUR MER, France, 2 CREOCEAN, Montpellier, France,<br />
3 CREOCEAN, St Pierre d'Oléron, France, 4 Yemen Lng Company, Sana'a, Yemen,<br />
5 Yemen Lng Company, St Pierre d'Oléron, Yemen<br />
As part of a mitigation measure associated with the construction of a Liquiefied Natural<br />
Gas (LNG) plant, four large coral transplantation missions were carried out in Bal Haf<br />
(South of Yemen), About 1,500 selected coral colonies were removed from four areas to<br />
be damaged with a surface area of 900, 2,700 and 3,500 m2.respectively. The coral<br />
colonies were transported and cemented in five new sites of 300 to more than 500 m2<br />
surface area. They belong to more than 40 species and 23 genera, with a dominance of<br />
massive forms such as Platygyra daedalea, Porites lobata-lutea, Favites sp and<br />
Echinopora lamellosa.<br />
These transplantations included moving 130 large Porites lutea-lobata weighing from<br />
200 kg up to 4 tonnes, using new transplantation techniques.<br />
Growth, in situ mortality and health condition of the transplants were monitored over<br />
nine months on a quarterly basis and will be followed for another 2 years at least. Photo<br />
quadrats, close up pictures of single remarkable colonies and growth measurements for<br />
Acropora species and a selection of large Porites were carried out during each of the<br />
three operations.<br />
Overall survival of corals nine months after transplantation was an encouraging 95%.<br />
Most losses of transplants were due to sedimentation of fine particles in the transplanted<br />
areas, fish predation, fishermen activity and hydrodynamic effects. Evidence of new<br />
growth was observed, especially on Acropora species, Porites lobata-lutea and, to a<br />
lesser extent, on some faviids.<br />
These transplantations carried out on a large scale clearly demonstrate the capacity of<br />
corals to adapt to a new environment, in favourable conditions. They prove that carefully<br />
designed coral reef rehabilitation strategies can be part of industrial development<br />
processes, whenever necessary.<br />
Oral Mini-Symposium 24: Reef Restoration<br />
24-19<br />
Coral Relocation For Impact Mitigation in Northern Qatar<br />
Deborah KILBANE* 1 , Bruce GRAHAM 1 , Robert MULCAHY 1 , Dr. Ali ONDER 2 , Mark<br />
PRATT 2<br />
1 CSA International, Inc., Stuart, FL, 2 Safety, Health, Environmental, & Risk Management,<br />
Qatar Liquefied Gas Company Ltd., Doha, Qatar<br />
A large-scale, long-distance coral relocation project was conducted as mitigation for potential<br />
impacts to hard coral habitat associated with marine construction activities offshore Ras Laffan<br />
Industrial City, Qatar. Working under the guidance of the Supreme Council for the<br />
Environment and Natural Reserves, Qatargas Operating Company Limited and its Expansion<br />
Projects engaged in a project to transplant over 4,500 corals from proposed pipeline corridors.<br />
Corals were transported 46 km from the north coast of Qatar to a fasht coral habitat along the<br />
east coast. This project represents an option for off-site mitigation and is an excellent example<br />
of proactive environmental regulation, corporate responsibility, and advanced field technology<br />
applied in concert to reduce impacts to a viable hard coral habitat.<br />
Hard coral relocation, which salvages and utilizes hard corals to accelerate natural coral habitat<br />
recovery in other areas, was implemented to reduce impacts associated with pipeline<br />
construction activities. Proven techniques for coral reattachment and newly developed methods<br />
designed to enhance coral survival were used for the efficient mass recovery, transport, and<br />
deployment of the corals. The relocation site was selected from 7 candidate sites based on local<br />
stakeholder consultation, the presence of an existing coral population, relative similarity of<br />
physical characteristics to the impacted area, and availability of suitable substrate for coral<br />
reattachment. Hard corals were transported in a specially designed, flow-through seawater<br />
holding pool during the single day transit to the relocation site and reattached using concrete.<br />
Within the reattachment site, temperature data loggers were deployed and approximately 5% of<br />
the reattached corals and control corals were selected and uniquely tagged for subsequent<br />
monitoring. Initial monitoring indicated high survival rates and habitat enhancement based on<br />
assessment of coral, epibiota, fish, and urchin populations. Future long-term monitoring will<br />
provide information on coral community dynamics in the Arabian Gulf.<br />
24-20<br />
Lessons Learnt From Applied Restoration Projects<br />
Sandrine JOB* 1<br />
1 Reef Restoration, CRISP, Noumea, New Caledonia<br />
The talk aims at presenting some lessons learnt from 4 restoration projects that have been<br />
conducted in the Indo-Pacific (Mayotte, New Caledonia, Fiji and Tuvalu; the 2 last projects<br />
being conducted under the CRISP Program).<br />
A brief overview of these projects, their objectives, methods used and general results will be<br />
given. An analysis of what went right or wrong will lead to possible recommendations on how<br />
the projects could be redesigned to enhance their results.<br />
Based on this specific work, a best practices guideline for conducting applied restoration<br />
projects will be discussed and general key instructions to follow while designing a restoration<br />
project will be proposed. This work is currently being performed for the writing of a Manual on<br />
Reef Restoration, a joint venture between CRTR and CRISP.<br />
219