11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
24-13<br />
Using Reef Resilience Principles To Improve Staghorn Coral (Acropora<br />
Cervicornis) Restoration in The Florida Keys<br />
Meaghan JOHNSON* 1 , Phil KRAMER 1 , Ken NEDIMYER 2<br />
1 The Nature Conservancy, Summerland Key, FL, 2 Healthy Reefs Inc., Tavernier Key, FL<br />
Significant declines in living coral coverage within the Florida Keys National Marine<br />
Sanctuary (and worldwide) have occurred in recent decades due to local, regional, and<br />
global threats. In particular, populations of the important reef building branching<br />
staghorn coral, Acropora cervicornis, have declined 80-90% throughout the Caribbean<br />
and western Atlantic since the late 1980’s, and has recently been listed as threatened<br />
under the Endangered Species Act in May 2006. This project aims to restore degraded<br />
reefs in the Upper Keys by transplanting fragments of naturally occurring, and wild<br />
staghorn coral. Approximately 25 staghorn coral colonies naturally settled onto a<br />
privately owned live rock farm within Sanctuary waters in the Upper Keys. In addition to<br />
these 25 parent colonies, 22 wild colonies were collected, fragmented, and brought back<br />
to the live rock farm (coral nursery). All of these colonies were fragmented, and<br />
cemented to small cement casts, that remain on platforms within the coral nursery. The<br />
genotypic identity of these corals was also determined within the first six months. This<br />
genetic marker will serve as a tool that allows for long term tracking of recruitment and<br />
proliferation. In November 2006, these fragments were outplanted to four different<br />
restorations sites, located within different reefs zones determined by the Florida Reef<br />
Resilience Program. These restoration sites will be monitored for coral growth rates,<br />
mortality, and the recolonization of reef-dwelling organisms. We expect to create a<br />
series of localized staghorn thickets following the rapid growth and expansion of the<br />
transplanted fragments. This project has now been expanded to three more sub-regions(<br />
Lower Keys, Miami transition, Broward), with future plans to expand to the Caribbean<br />
region.<br />
24-14<br />
Coral Recovery And Rehabilitation From Blast Fishing in Indonesian Rubble Fields<br />
Helen FOX* 1 , Roy CALDWELL 2 , Sangeeta MANGUBHAI 3<br />
1 Conservation Science, World Wildlife Fund-US, Washington, DC, 2 <strong>University</strong> of<br />
California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 3 P.T. Putri Naga Komodo, Labuan Bajo, Indonesia<br />
Although fishing with explosives (dynamite or homemade bombs) continues to impact<br />
reefs throughout Indonesia and beyond, there are success stories where blasting has been<br />
halted and the surviving reefs protected, such as in Komodo National Park. Here, we<br />
report results of long-term research (10 y) examining natural recovery from blast fishing<br />
and the efficacy of rock piles as a low-tech, locally-available reef rehabilitation method.<br />
Comparative studies in North Sulawesi of acute single blasts of known age showed that<br />
this rubble slowly stabilized, and craters filled in with surrounding coral and new<br />
colonies. After five years, coral cover within craters no longer differed significantly from<br />
control plots. In contrast, the large rubble fields created by chronic blasting in Komodo<br />
remain devoid of corals despite adequate supply of coral larvae, with no appreciable<br />
natural recovery over 10 years, hence the need for rehabilitation research. After pilot<br />
studies of different methodologies (1998-2002), locally quarried rocks were chosen to<br />
scale up. In 2002, four different configurations of rock piles were installed at four sites,<br />
covering ~6000m 2 total. Rock piles stabilize the rubble, attenuate water currents, recreate<br />
the three-dimensional structure of an intact reef, and provide surfaces for coral<br />
recruitment and refuges for other invertebrates and fish. Coral recruitment was<br />
considerable and coral colonies grew at the rate of 15-20 cm/year at some sites, but<br />
rubble encroachment remains a problem at the highest current sites. Thus, this<br />
rehabilitation method is feasible at these scales at lower cost than most, although this<br />
work highlights the need for comparative studies. Furthermore, it would likely be<br />
cheaper and more efficient to prevent the damage in the first place.<br />
Oral Mini-Symposium 24: Reef Restoration<br />
24-15<br />
Lessons for Minimizing Impacts to Coral Reef and Other Ecosystems from the 2004<br />
Tsunami<br />
Dwayne MEADOWS* 1<br />
1 Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, MD<br />
The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami left a vast amount of destruction in its wake on land and in the<br />
sea. About 60% of coral reefs in affected areas of Thailand were damaged. Many damaged<br />
reef areas in Thailand and Sri Lanka were high value tourist attractions or provided other<br />
important ecosystem goods and services. We were part of a fortuitous partnership of people<br />
with experience in reef restoration, coral reef science, marine debris removal, construction,<br />
professional SCUBA diving, business, marketing, and environmental NGOs. We helped<br />
organize and funded multiple restoration and cleanup projects that restored damaged and<br />
detached sea fans in Similan Islands Marine National Park, restored hard corals, removed over<br />
400 tons of marine debris, and provided sustainable management advice to local stakeholders<br />
and decision-makers. We later became involved in advising emergency management agencies<br />
on tsunami preparedness and response. We report on lessons learned for re-attachment of large<br />
sea fans, triaging and organizing large-scale volunteer marine debris recovery and coral<br />
ecosystem restoration efforts, and mitigating and planning for future natural disaster impacts on<br />
fishery ecosystems. We argue that "natural" disasters can cause significant damage to reefs,<br />
and much damage results from human sources that are not "natural" and can be mitigated or<br />
prevented (such as siting and land use decisions that lead to debris affecting reefs). Thus we<br />
disagree with those who say natural events like hurricanes or tsunamis "are not appropriate for<br />
reef restoration". Further, governments need to recognize the economic and inherent values of<br />
ecosystem goods and services in natural disaster response legislation and policies (e.g., The<br />
Stafford Act in the U.S.) to improve outcomes. We also argue that ecosystem advocates need to<br />
adopt the language of emergency management and become more involved in emergency<br />
management disaster planning.<br />
24-16<br />
Sea Fan Recovery after the Tsunami 2004 at Mu Ko Similan National Park, Andaman<br />
Sea, Thailand<br />
Sakanan PLATHONG* 1 , Charles BENZIES 1 , Fumihito IWASE 2<br />
1 Coral Reef and Benthos Research Unit, Department of Biology, Prince of Songkla <strong>University</strong>,<br />
Hat Yai, Songkla, Thailand, 2 Kuroshio Biological Research Foundation, Tokyo, Japan<br />
At the Similan Islands, Thailand, one of the biggest impacts from the tsunami was on the<br />
gorgonian sea fan where approximately 250 individual colonies were found to have fallen from<br />
their substrate. As part of the reef recovery efforts following the tsunami, a project aimed at sea<br />
fan reattachment was launched in January 2005 and continued through the year. Many fallen sea<br />
fan colonies were lying on the sea floor for 2 weeks - 4 months, where they suffered tissue<br />
damage. Initially the sea fans were temporarily supported in the flowing current to enable<br />
feeding while methods of permanent reattachment were investigated. Fallen sea fans were<br />
reattached using a variety of methods. One hundred sixty four colonies were cemented to a rock<br />
substrate aboard a boat and then replaced by divers back in the floor. Wooden wedges were<br />
used to hold 54 sea fans into cracks in the rock substrate. Iron rods hammered into the sand,<br />
rocks placed at the base of the sea fan and cable ties were also used to support sea fans<br />
temporarily. Many large sea fans had to be cut into segments to make them more manageable.<br />
In total, about 450 whole sea fans or colony fragments have been recovered and reattached.<br />
Recovered sea fans showed a high occurrence of infected tissue due to an unknown microbial<br />
infection, often resulting in severe or total tissue loss and death of the colony. The infection,<br />
characterised by white matter spreading rapidly over the axial skeleton, was shown to be<br />
Aspergillosis. As of February 2006, about 80% of recovered sea fans found and about 50% of<br />
the total number of colonies recovered has survived.<br />
218