24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

23-17<br />

The U.s. Coral Reef Task Force: A Model For Fostering Coral Reef Management At<br />

National To Local Scales<br />

Beth DIEVENEY* 1 , Roger GRIFFIS 2<br />

1 National Ocean Service, NOAA, Silver Spring, MD, 2 National Marine Fisheries Service,<br />

NOAA, Silver Spring, MD<br />

The purpose of this study was to assess the strengths and challenges of U.S. Coral Reef<br />

Task Force (USCRTF) efforts to mobilize U.S. coral reef conservation at local to<br />

international levels. The unique success of the USCRTF has been its ability to bring<br />

together government entities with diverse mandates to identify national goals and foster<br />

work at the local level that addresses both local and national priorities for coral reef<br />

conservation. The USCRTF includes 12 U.S. Government agencies, seven states and<br />

territories, and three Freely Associated States. This broad membership makes the<br />

USCRTF uniquely situated to promote coral reef conservation in a holistic, ecosystembased<br />

approach. The USCRTF developed the first U.S. National Action Plan to Conserve<br />

Coral Reefs and the National Coral Reef Action Strategy which both serve to define and<br />

direct its overarching goals, objectives, and activities. These national goals were further<br />

refined into place-based Local Action Strategies (LAS) to address six priority threats:<br />

over-fishing, land-based sources of pollution, recreational overuse and misuse, lack of<br />

public awareness, climate change, and coral bleaching/disease. The LAS provide a<br />

framework for USCRTF member agencies to identify and address these threats and<br />

additional local needs, connect local priorities to national goals, coordinate Federal<br />

agency actions with local management of reef resources, and increase collaboration and<br />

resources to implement conservation actions. In addition, LAS provide a means to<br />

specifically focus on the needs of one region or jurisdiction while also providing a<br />

mechanism to apply adaptive management among and between the various regions. The<br />

USCRTF has also utilized its diverse membership to promote a broad suite of other<br />

management, research, and technical tools to more effectively and collaboratively<br />

manage coral reef ecosystems.<br />

23-18<br />

Mesoamerican Marine Protected Area Effects on Resource User Livelihoods<br />

Mark ZEGLER* 1<br />

1 Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Marine Science, <strong>University</strong> of California Santa<br />

Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA<br />

This paper analyzes the changes in the livelihoods of local coastal resource users that<br />

occurred due to the designation of marine protected areas in Belize and Mexico within<br />

the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef Systems (MBRS). These marine protected areas are<br />

situated in coastal waters of the Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve and the Parque Nacional<br />

Arrecifes de Xcalak in Belize and Mexico respectively and were both established to<br />

promote biodiversity conservation and economic development. Fieldwork in 2004-2005<br />

documented the changes that occurred to local livelihoods in the conservation, fishery,<br />

and tourism sectors. The modifications to coastal governance regimes changed local<br />

livelihoods in each case study area. Implementation of marine protected areas reduced<br />

fishery pressure on many commercial fish species, and increased pressure on some<br />

species targeted by tourist sport fishing boats. In both cases, some locals benefited as<br />

conservation and tourist use expanded, while others lost jobs in the fishery sector. The<br />

results of this research indicate that marine protected areas affect livelihoods and shift use<br />

from commercial fishing to conservation and tourist use of the reef. Geographic<br />

information system analyses of informant map biographies indicate that the spatial<br />

patterns of livelihood activities changed within the boundaries of each respective marine<br />

protected area. Evidence suggests protected area networks can be effective in promoting<br />

societal goals for conservation and development if geographic, institutional, and social<br />

factors are included in the design process.<br />

Oral Mini-Symposium 23: Reef Management<br />

23-19<br />

Coral Cover, Reef Fish Abundance And Revenues Of Gilutongan Marine Sanctuary,<br />

Central Philippines From 1998 -2007<br />

Pamela Alma AMOLO* 1 , Rizaller AMOLO 1<br />

1 Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation Inc., Cebu City, Philippines<br />

Gilutongan Marine Sanctuary (GMS) is a 15ha marine protected area (MPA) in Central,<br />

Philippines. It was established as a means to rehabilitate degraded reef and address dwindling<br />

fish catch. Its management has proven to be an effective strategy that has made it an important<br />

tourism destination and has generated economic revenues. This study examines the trends of the<br />

benthic community and reef fish population from the 10-year biophysical monitoring conducted<br />

in GMS from 1998 – 2007. It also compared the tourist arrival and revenue generated by the<br />

MPA . Benthic data showed a significant change in live hard coral cover and coral mortality<br />

index, both inside and outside the marine sanctuary, after 10 years of protection. A significant<br />

difference in fish abundance was observed inside and outside portions of the MPA. Tourist<br />

arrival and revenue rapidly increased over the first 3-years of protection and has gradually<br />

level-off in recent years. This paper also presents lesson learned in managing MPAs involving<br />

community and tourism activities. Some of which includes: management and monitoring of<br />

tourism and other potential impacts is a crucial element for MPA sustainability. Also, revenues<br />

from MPA should benefit the community primarily involved in its management.<br />

23-20<br />

Seaweed Farming: An Alternative Livelihood, A Last Resort, Or Subsidising Overfishing<br />

Of Coral Reefs?<br />

Nicholas HILL* 1,2 , EJ MILNER-GULLAND 3 , Marcus ROWCLIFFE 1 , Guy COWLISHAW 1 ,<br />

Amado BLANCO 4 , Heather KOLDEWEY 5<br />

1 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom, 2 Division of<br />

Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, 3 Division of Biology, Imperial<br />

College London, Ascot, United Kingdom, 4 Project Seahorse Foundation for Marine<br />

Conservation, Cebu City, Philippines, 5 Zoological Society of London, London, United<br />

Kingdom<br />

A lack of options is frequently seen as the cause of overfishing and destructive fishing on coral<br />

reefs. Alternative livelihoods have therefore been embraced to address this problem. Seaweed<br />

farming is one such alternative. Some authors have recognised that seaweed farming may just<br />

become one component of a diversified livelihood in poor communities, limiting its ability to<br />

reduce fishing pressure. However, cases do exist where seaweed farming achieves this goal.<br />

But few studies have examined the conditions under which it does so, and, more importantly,<br />

the conditions under which it can result in the opposite effect. We compare the situation in<br />

island communities on Danajon Bank in the central Philippines where seaweed farming is being<br />

actively promoted and has lead to different outcomes. Using interviews and group research, we<br />

examine the conditions under which seaweed farming reduces fishing pressure at a household<br />

and community level. In one community, unique environmental conditions and communitylevel<br />

attributes appear to have reduced fishing pressure following the uptake of seaweed<br />

farming at both the community and household level, resulting in a perceived increase in fish<br />

abundance. Elsewhere, we find that for some households it only acts as an activity of last resort<br />

when fishing is no longer viable. Of greatest concern, seaweed farming appears to be<br />

subsidising some households’ intensive fishing activity in heavily degraded areas where they<br />

are operating at a loss and would otherwise not be able to continue fishing. Understanding the<br />

conditions that lead to these different outcomes will help us to develop more effective<br />

management interventions when confronted with issues of poverty. We address the conditions<br />

that have led to these different outcomes.<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!