11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
23-17<br />
The U.s. Coral Reef Task Force: A Model For Fostering Coral Reef Management At<br />
National To Local Scales<br />
Beth DIEVENEY* 1 , Roger GRIFFIS 2<br />
1 National Ocean Service, NOAA, Silver Spring, MD, 2 National Marine Fisheries Service,<br />
NOAA, Silver Spring, MD<br />
The purpose of this study was to assess the strengths and challenges of U.S. Coral Reef<br />
Task Force (USCRTF) efforts to mobilize U.S. coral reef conservation at local to<br />
international levels. The unique success of the USCRTF has been its ability to bring<br />
together government entities with diverse mandates to identify national goals and foster<br />
work at the local level that addresses both local and national priorities for coral reef<br />
conservation. The USCRTF includes 12 U.S. Government agencies, seven states and<br />
territories, and three Freely Associated States. This broad membership makes the<br />
USCRTF uniquely situated to promote coral reef conservation in a holistic, ecosystembased<br />
approach. The USCRTF developed the first U.S. National Action Plan to Conserve<br />
Coral Reefs and the National Coral Reef Action Strategy which both serve to define and<br />
direct its overarching goals, objectives, and activities. These national goals were further<br />
refined into place-based Local Action Strategies (LAS) to address six priority threats:<br />
over-fishing, land-based sources of pollution, recreational overuse and misuse, lack of<br />
public awareness, climate change, and coral bleaching/disease. The LAS provide a<br />
framework for USCRTF member agencies to identify and address these threats and<br />
additional local needs, connect local priorities to national goals, coordinate Federal<br />
agency actions with local management of reef resources, and increase collaboration and<br />
resources to implement conservation actions. In addition, LAS provide a means to<br />
specifically focus on the needs of one region or jurisdiction while also providing a<br />
mechanism to apply adaptive management among and between the various regions. The<br />
USCRTF has also utilized its diverse membership to promote a broad suite of other<br />
management, research, and technical tools to more effectively and collaboratively<br />
manage coral reef ecosystems.<br />
23-18<br />
Mesoamerican Marine Protected Area Effects on Resource User Livelihoods<br />
Mark ZEGLER* 1<br />
1 Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Marine Science, <strong>University</strong> of California Santa<br />
Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA<br />
This paper analyzes the changes in the livelihoods of local coastal resource users that<br />
occurred due to the designation of marine protected areas in Belize and Mexico within<br />
the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef Systems (MBRS). These marine protected areas are<br />
situated in coastal waters of the Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve and the Parque Nacional<br />
Arrecifes de Xcalak in Belize and Mexico respectively and were both established to<br />
promote biodiversity conservation and economic development. Fieldwork in 2004-2005<br />
documented the changes that occurred to local livelihoods in the conservation, fishery,<br />
and tourism sectors. The modifications to coastal governance regimes changed local<br />
livelihoods in each case study area. Implementation of marine protected areas reduced<br />
fishery pressure on many commercial fish species, and increased pressure on some<br />
species targeted by tourist sport fishing boats. In both cases, some locals benefited as<br />
conservation and tourist use expanded, while others lost jobs in the fishery sector. The<br />
results of this research indicate that marine protected areas affect livelihoods and shift use<br />
from commercial fishing to conservation and tourist use of the reef. Geographic<br />
information system analyses of informant map biographies indicate that the spatial<br />
patterns of livelihood activities changed within the boundaries of each respective marine<br />
protected area. Evidence suggests protected area networks can be effective in promoting<br />
societal goals for conservation and development if geographic, institutional, and social<br />
factors are included in the design process.<br />
Oral Mini-Symposium 23: Reef Management<br />
23-19<br />
Coral Cover, Reef Fish Abundance And Revenues Of Gilutongan Marine Sanctuary,<br />
Central Philippines From 1998 -2007<br />
Pamela Alma AMOLO* 1 , Rizaller AMOLO 1<br />
1 Coastal Conservation and Education Foundation Inc., Cebu City, Philippines<br />
Gilutongan Marine Sanctuary (GMS) is a 15ha marine protected area (MPA) in Central,<br />
Philippines. It was established as a means to rehabilitate degraded reef and address dwindling<br />
fish catch. Its management has proven to be an effective strategy that has made it an important<br />
tourism destination and has generated economic revenues. This study examines the trends of the<br />
benthic community and reef fish population from the 10-year biophysical monitoring conducted<br />
in GMS from 1998 – 2007. It also compared the tourist arrival and revenue generated by the<br />
MPA . Benthic data showed a significant change in live hard coral cover and coral mortality<br />
index, both inside and outside the marine sanctuary, after 10 years of protection. A significant<br />
difference in fish abundance was observed inside and outside portions of the MPA. Tourist<br />
arrival and revenue rapidly increased over the first 3-years of protection and has gradually<br />
level-off in recent years. This paper also presents lesson learned in managing MPAs involving<br />
community and tourism activities. Some of which includes: management and monitoring of<br />
tourism and other potential impacts is a crucial element for MPA sustainability. Also, revenues<br />
from MPA should benefit the community primarily involved in its management.<br />
23-20<br />
Seaweed Farming: An Alternative Livelihood, A Last Resort, Or Subsidising Overfishing<br />
Of Coral Reefs?<br />
Nicholas HILL* 1,2 , EJ MILNER-GULLAND 3 , Marcus ROWCLIFFE 1 , Guy COWLISHAW 1 ,<br />
Amado BLANCO 4 , Heather KOLDEWEY 5<br />
1 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom, 2 Division of<br />
Biology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, 3 Division of Biology, Imperial<br />
College London, Ascot, United Kingdom, 4 Project Seahorse Foundation for Marine<br />
Conservation, Cebu City, Philippines, 5 Zoological Society of London, London, United<br />
Kingdom<br />
A lack of options is frequently seen as the cause of overfishing and destructive fishing on coral<br />
reefs. Alternative livelihoods have therefore been embraced to address this problem. Seaweed<br />
farming is one such alternative. Some authors have recognised that seaweed farming may just<br />
become one component of a diversified livelihood in poor communities, limiting its ability to<br />
reduce fishing pressure. However, cases do exist where seaweed farming achieves this goal.<br />
But few studies have examined the conditions under which it does so, and, more importantly,<br />
the conditions under which it can result in the opposite effect. We compare the situation in<br />
island communities on Danajon Bank in the central Philippines where seaweed farming is being<br />
actively promoted and has lead to different outcomes. Using interviews and group research, we<br />
examine the conditions under which seaweed farming reduces fishing pressure at a household<br />
and community level. In one community, unique environmental conditions and communitylevel<br />
attributes appear to have reduced fishing pressure following the uptake of seaweed<br />
farming at both the community and household level, resulting in a perceived increase in fish<br />
abundance. Elsewhere, we find that for some households it only acts as an activity of last resort<br />
when fishing is no longer viable. Of greatest concern, seaweed farming appears to be<br />
subsidising some households’ intensive fishing activity in heavily degraded areas where they<br />
are operating at a loss and would otherwise not be able to continue fishing. Understanding the<br />
conditions that lead to these different outcomes will help us to develop more effective<br />
management interventions when confronted with issues of poverty. We address the conditions<br />
that have led to these different outcomes.<br />
200