11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
22-46<br />
Population Genetic Structure Of A Coral Reef Ecosystem Apex Predator, The Gray<br />
Reef Shark (Carcharhinus Amblyrhynchos)<br />
Rebekah HORN* 1 , William ROBBINS 2 , Douglas MCCAULEY 3 , Philip LOBEL 4 ,<br />
Mahmood SHIVJI 1<br />
1 National Coral Reef Institute, <strong>Nova</strong> <strong>Southeastern</strong> <strong>University</strong>, Dania Beach, FL,<br />
2 Cronulla Fisheries Research Centre, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Cronulla,<br />
Bangladesh, 3 Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford <strong>University</strong>, Pacific Grove, CA, 4 Biology<br />
Department, Boston <strong>University</strong>, Boston, United States Minor Outlying Islands<br />
Sharks play a major functional role as apex predators in coral reef ecosystems, raising<br />
concerns that their ongoing overexploitation will compromise the integrity and<br />
sustainability of reefs. The gray reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) is a strongly<br />
coral reef associated species whose populations are known to have declined substantially<br />
in some regions. There is no information on population structure in this species to aid in<br />
their management and conservation. We are assessing genetic structure in this species by<br />
using entire mitochondrial control region sequences and 15 nuclear microsatellite loci as<br />
markers. 93 gray reef shark samples were obtained from across the species’ Indo-Pacific<br />
distribution (eastern Indian Ocean [Madagascar/Seychelles], Central Pacific [Hawaii],<br />
Southwestern Pacific (eastern Australia, Palmyra, Palau, Cocos (Keeling) Islands]).<br />
Mitochondrial (AMOVA) and microsatellite (STRUCTURE) data concordantly identify<br />
the Hawaii population as a distinct genetic group relative to other sampling locations. The<br />
microsatellite data further identify 3 distinct overall gray reef shark groups (eastern<br />
Indian Ocean, Central Pacific, and Southwestern Pacific). Our current analyses do not<br />
show any evidence of population structure among islands of the Southwestern Pacific,<br />
although this question is being further addressed with additional samples from more<br />
locations. These results show strong genetic differentiation exists in gray reef shark<br />
populations separated by expanses of open ocean, and suggest proper management of this<br />
declining species will have to occur at the very least on a regional geographic scale.<br />
22-47<br />
Population Genetic Structure Of The Parrotfish Scarus Ghobban in The Western<br />
Indian Ocean And Its Implication For Fish Stock Management<br />
Oskar HENRIKSSON* 1 , Shakil VISRAM 2 , Ruby MOOTHIEN PILLAY 3 , Sadri<br />
SAID 4 , Mats GRAHN 1<br />
1 School of life science, Sodertorns university college, Huddinge, Sweden, 2 CORDIO East<br />
Africa, Mombasa, Kenya, 3 Mauritius Oceanography Institute, Quatre Bornes, Mauritius,<br />
4 Institute of Marine Sciences, <strong>University</strong> of Dar es Salaam, Zanzibar, Tanzania<br />
Much is unknown about the population structure of fish in the Western Indian Ocean<br />
(WIO). The knowledge of the genetic structure of a population is essential for the optimal<br />
designation of fish stocks this knowledge is important for sustainable management. Most<br />
fish stocks are today defined and managed by countries and not geographical regions.<br />
However, fish populations do not adhere to political boundaries, hence neither should the<br />
management of fish stocks. This study aims to investigate the genetic structure and<br />
connectivity of Scarus ghobban which is important for subsistence fishing in the WIO.<br />
Little research has so far been conducted on S. ghobban, and for this reason not much is<br />
known of its potential for migration and the genetic connectivity between different<br />
regions. The spatial genetic variation at 16 locations has been examined: 3 sites on<br />
Mauritius, 5 sites in Tanzania and 8 sites in Kenya. Levels of population differentiation<br />
were investigated using the DNA fingerprinting method Amplified Fragment Length<br />
Polymorphisms (AFLP). Results indicate the presence of several genetically<br />
differentiated subpopulations of S. ghobban, which might need to be managed separately.<br />
The implication of this data is that the current scale of management in the region is too<br />
local. Today the foremost management regime is mainly through beach management<br />
units which operate on a scale far smaller than the size of the potential fish stocks.<br />
Oral Mini-Symposium 22: Coral Reef Associated Fisheries<br />
22-48<br />
Central Pacific Survey Reveals Lower Reef Shark Density Near Human Population<br />
Centers<br />
Marc NADON* 1 , Benjamin RICHARD 1 , Brian ZGLICZYNSKI 2 , Robert SCHROEDER 1 ,<br />
Russell BRAINARD 2<br />
1 CRED, JIMAR-NOAA-PIFSC, Honolulu, HI, 2 CRED, NOAA-PIFSC, Honolulu, HI<br />
Biennial surveys (2000-2007) of coral-reef shark populations were conducted around 50 U.S.<br />
Pacific Islands in several regions: the Hawaiian Archipelago, the Marianas Archipelago, the<br />
Line Islands, the Phoenix Islands, and the American Samoa Archipelago. Two fisheriesindependent<br />
census methods were implemented by divers: stationary point counts and toweddiver<br />
surveys. Five species of sharks were recorded in sufficient frequency to allow meaningful<br />
statistical analyses: grey reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos), galapagos shark<br />
(Carcharhinus galapagensis), whitetip reef shark (Triaenodon obesus), blacktip reef shark<br />
(Carcharhinus melanopterus), and tawny nurse shark (Nebrius ferrugineus). Preliminary<br />
analyses showed a highly significant negative relationship between grey reef and galapagos<br />
shark densities and proximity to human population centers (e.g., proxy for potential fishing<br />
pressure and other human impacts). Average combined numerical density for these two species<br />
near population centers was less than 1% of densities recorded at the most isolated islands (e.g.,<br />
no human population, very low present or historical fishing pressure or other human activity).<br />
Even around islands with no human habitation but within reach of populated areas, gray reef<br />
and galapagos shark densities were only between 15 and 40% of the population densities around<br />
the most isolated near-pristine reefs. Trends in whitetip and blacktip reef shark numbers were<br />
similar, but less dramatic. Tawny nurse shark densities were low around most islands. This<br />
study is the first fisheries-independent large-scale survey of shark populations in the central<br />
Pacific. From our preliminary results we infer that some shark populations near human<br />
population centers are severely depleted.<br />
22-49<br />
From Depensation To Compensation: Processes That Drive The Recovery Of A Depleted<br />
Population<br />
Robert GLAZER* 1 , Gabriel DELGADO 1 , Lonny ANDERSON 2 , David HAWTOF 3 , Paul<br />
KUBILIS 4<br />
1 Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission,<br />
Marathon, FL, 2 Keys Marine Laboratory, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission,<br />
Layton, FL, 3 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Marathon, FL, 4 Program for<br />
Environmental Statistics, <strong>University</strong> of Florida, Gainseville, FL<br />
The recovery of a depleted population depends to a great extent on the interactions between life<br />
history strategies and ecological processes. Using data from a 10-year study, we show the<br />
processes that affected how a population of queen conch (Strombus gigas) recovered in the<br />
Florida Keys archipelago. We describe the progression of the recovery from its initial stages<br />
where it was at critically low densities and was dominated by depensatory processes resulting in<br />
limited reproductive encounters. As the population density increased, the proportion of the<br />
population engaged in reproductive encounters also increased; however, the area occupied by<br />
the population remained relatively constant. In 1999, when the maximum density was achieved<br />
(approximately 1,100 conch per ha), compensatory processes predominated and the area<br />
occupied by the population expanded rapidly with a concurrent and significant shift of the<br />
population into less-favorable habitat. These processes help to explain recovery of depleted or<br />
endangered species and may provide guidance to managers on how best to design protected<br />
areas.<br />
194