11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University 11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
Oral Mini-Symposium 17: Emerging Techniques in Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis 17-33 Geospatial Analysis: An Effective Tool For Simulating The Spatial And Temporal Dynamics Of Tropical Cyclone Disturbance Of Coral Reef Communities Across The Great Barrier Reef Region Marji PUOTINEN* 1 , Katharina FABRICIUS 2 , Glenn DE'ATH 2 , Terry DONE 2 1 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia, 2 Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia Tropical cyclones (hurricanes, typhoons) can cause major mechanical damage to coral reefs, which when repeated over time, can significantly affect the structure and function of reef communities such as those of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR). Understanding the timing and frequency of these events (disturbance regime) requires mapping both the energy generated by each of a representative set of cyclones and the subsequent reef damage. However, direct measurements like these are rare in the GBR. For this reason, a meteorological model adapted to run in a GIS was used to reconstruct maximum wind speeds (as a proxy for wave heights) for 85 cyclones that passed near the GBR from 1969 to 2003. A comparison with limited field data of damage from cyclones Ivor and Joy (1990) and Justin (1997) was used to establish thresholds of maximum winds capable of damaging reefs. From these, a disturbance history was constructed. In 2005, severe tropical cyclone Ingrid crossed the Far Northern GBR, a region that had not been affected by major disturbances of any kind for several decades, and where benthic data had been collected before the event. This provided a unique opportunity to test the skill of the model in predicting reef damage and to refine the damage thresholds. An extensive field survey (82 sites on 32 reefs along the modelled wind gradient) showed that the types and intensity of damage were well explained by modelled maximum wind speed, and by spatial and biotic factors. For example, maximum winds 40 m s -1 caused catastrophic damage on inshore and offshore reefs, respectively. These results are being used to better understand both current and future (possible greater frequency / intensity) cyclone disturbance regime dynamics. 17-34 Marine Integrated Decision Analysis System (Midas) Suchi GOPAL* 1 , Les KAUFMANN 1 , Hrishi PATEL 1 1 Boston University, Boston, MA Marine areas are critical regions on the Earth's surface as nearly two-thirds of the world's people live within 150 km of a coastline and are dependent on marine resources. Marine conservation has become seminal in this context. We present a spatial decision support system framework called MIDAS - Marine Integrated Decision Analysis System that integrates spatial and nonspatial data for marine management. The components of MIDAS are: (1) JIM (Java Interface for Managers) a graphic interface and JAVA code (programming) that allows a MMA manager to change parameters or conditions as a thought experiment and see outputs or consequences of a user-driven change in parameter states; (2) a GIS database that appears in map form, called JIM-Mapper, implemented using ArcIMS, that allows for dynamic GIS displays and spatial analysis; 3) a Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) to provide an appropriate method for developing predictive models of marine management effectiveness. The marine BBN's general structure is that of an integrated knowledge extraction/expert system. Knowledge is extracted from scientific literature as well as from experts for representing concepts as well as their relationships. BBNs represent information in the form of probabilities, enabling many different sources of data to be integrated and analyzed according to a common framework. We discuss the implementation of the three components of MIDAS for Belize and Brazil marine coastal management. 17-35 A Procedure To Target Coral Reef Deterioration Using Ikonos Satellite Imagery, Zone Boundaries, And Coral Reef Use Candace NEWMAN* 1 1 Geography, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada We have developed a procedure to identify specific locations of coral habitat that have a ‘high probability of acute deterioration’ caused by human impact. The procedure uses satellite imagery, coral zonal boundaries, and coral reef use by dive operators and fishermen. The procedure involves development of a habitat map, then overlaying zonal boundaries and reef use data in a GIS. Using a set of criteria, sites with a ‘high probability of acute deterioration’ are identified, and then validated using in-situ field survey data. The potential for this procedure to address local coral reef management issues is significant, and relevant to current management projects on Bunaken Island, Indonesia. It is increasingly evident that context-relevant maps are essential to address acute coral reef degradation concerns in developing nations. On Bunaken Island, specific coral reef management projects are consistently undertaken, and many projects are focused on conflict resolution between coral reef resource user groups – dive operators and fishermen. Therefore, a challenge is to utilize remotely sensed information, combined with context-specific information, to contribute relevant and useful management information to these projects. In this study, we develop a procedure to address this challenge. IKONOS satellite imagery was captured in 2001 and 2004 and has been integrated with zonal boundary data of Bunaken Island, which recognizes different coral reef use activities and coral reef use data by dive operator and fishermen groups. Following integration and analysis in a GIS, sites of ‘high probability of acute deterioration’ have been identified. Results were validated using field survey data, as well as contributions from Universitas Sam Ratulangi and local NGOs. 17-36 The Coral Reef Landscape: Spatial Patterns Of Water Quality in The Florida Daniel WAGNER* 1 , Eric MIELBRECHT 2 , Robert VAN WOESIK 1 1 Department of Biology, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, 2 Emerald Coast Environmental Consulting, Washington, DC While we have some peripheral understanding of water-quality ‘weather’, which includes nutrients, salinity, temperature and turbidity, we know little about the coral-reef landscape ‘climate’ and the influences of that climate on coral-community structure. Determining the scales of the inherent variability of key environmental variables is clearly necessary. We use landscape-ecology techniques coupled with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technologies to examine the spatial dynamics of specific water-quality parameters along the Florida Keys reef tract. The spatial distance at which temperature variance stabilized throughout the region was dependent on whether the samples were from the surface or near-substrate. Greater homogeneity was found for near-substrate temperatures, with patches at ≤ 1.075 km compared to ≤ 0.893 km for the surface. Salinity was more homogeneous at the surface (≤ 1.662 km) than near the substrate (≤ 0.234 km). Surface chlorophyll a showed greater homogeneity at ≤ 0.592 km while DIN patches were more homogeneous near the substrate (≤ 2.873 km) than at the surface (≤ 0.151 km). The greater variability of other parameters, including turbidity and total nitrogen, precluded accurate predictions at the applied spatial scale of sampling. This is not to say turbidity for example is not important, because it is, but we need to re-evaluate the sampling strategy to capture the inherent scale at which these parameters vary. Moreover, temperature variance decreased across the shelf from inshore zones to offshore as a function of distance from the shoreline. The significant difference between surface and near-substrate temperatures seriously questions the commonplace use of sea surface temperature data in evaluating direct influence on reef corals because it ignores the variability of the system due to the stratification of the water column. 149
18-1 Stony Coral Status And Trends in Dry Tortugas National Park (Florida, Usa): 1975- 2007 Douglas MORRISON* 1 , Walt JAAP 2 , Carl BEAVER 2 , Michael CALLAHAN 2 , Dustin JOHNSON 2 , Jim KIDNEY 2 , Selena KUPFNER 2 , Shannon WADE 2 , Jennifer WHEATON 2 1 Dry Tortugas National Park, USNPS, Key Largo, FL, 2 Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, FFWCC, St. Petersburg, FL Coral reefs are arguably the most important natural resource in Dry Tortugas National Park (DTNP). Stony coral abundance in DTNP has been monitored periodically since the mid-1970’s using multiple methods. Live coral percent cover has been measured using photo quadrats and video transects at fixed stations. Larger scale assessments of coral spatial extent have been conducted using aerial and in-water surveys. There has been a substantial decrease in stony corals, especially Acropora spp., over the last 30 years. There were 479 hectares of Acropora dominated reefs (mostly A. cervicornis) in the park in 1976; but, there are currently only about four hectares of live Acropora thickets, a 99% loss. Furthermore, Acropora live cover is
- Page 116 and 117: Oral Mini-Symposium 11: From Molecu
- Page 118 and 119: 12-5 The Contribution Of Heterotrop
- Page 120 and 121: 12-14 Ocean Dynamics Drive Coral Re
- Page 122 and 123: 12-23 Coral Reef Resilience To Chro
- Page 124 and 125: 13-1 Prioritizing Conservation Hots
- Page 126 and 127: Oral Mini-Symposium 13: Evolution a
- Page 128 and 129: 14-6 Modelling Coral Larval Dispers
- Page 130 and 131: 14-14 Environmentally-Mediated Vari
- Page 132 and 133: 14-21 Same, Same, But Different: Co
- Page 134 and 135: 14-29 Complex Patterns of Genetic C
- Page 136 and 137: 14-37 Genetic Connectivity in Phili
- Page 138 and 139: 14-45 Range-Wide Population Genetic
- Page 140 and 141: 14-55 The Importance Of Behavior On
- Page 142 and 143: Oral Mini-Symposium 15: Progress in
- Page 144 and 145: Oral Mini-Symposium 15: Progress in
- Page 146 and 147: Oral Mini-Symposium 16: Ecosystem A
- Page 148 and 149: Oral Mini-Symposium 16: Ecosystem A
- Page 150 and 151: Oral Mini-Symposium 16: Ecosystem A
- Page 152 and 153: Oral Mini-Symposium 16: Ecosystem A
- Page 154 and 155: Oral Mini-Symposium 16: Ecosystem A
- Page 156 and 157: Oral Mini-Symposium 16: Ecosystem A
- Page 158 and 159: Oral Mini-Symposium 17: Emerging Te
- Page 160 and 161: Oral Mini-Symposium 17: Emerging Te
- Page 162 and 163: Oral Mini-Symposium 17: Emerging Te
- Page 164 and 165: Oral Mini-Symposium 17: Emerging Te
- Page 168 and 169: 18-5 Coral Reef Habitat Around New
- Page 170 and 171: 18-13 Response Of High Latitude Her
- Page 172 and 173: 18-21 Socio-Economic Monitoring (So
- Page 174 and 175: 18-29 Extent And Timing Of Disturba
- Page 176 and 177: 18-37 It Depends On Where You Look:
- Page 178 and 179: 18-45 New Insights Into The Exposur
- Page 180 and 181: Oral Mini-Symposium 19: Biogeochemi
- Page 182 and 183: Oral Mini-Symposium 19: Biogeochemi
- Page 184 and 185: Oral Mini-Symposium 19: Biogeochemi
- Page 186 and 187: Oral Mini-Symposium 19: Biogeochemi
- Page 188 and 189: Oral Mini-Symposium 20: Modeling Co
- Page 190 and 191: Oral Mini-Symposium 20: Modeling Co
- Page 192 and 193: 21-9 Integrated Economic Valuation
- Page 194 and 195: 21-19 Towards Local Fishers Partici
- Page 196 and 197: 21-27 The Political Aspects Of Resi
- Page 198 and 199: 21-37 Exploitation And Trade Of Cor
- Page 200 and 201: 22-1 Complex Ecological Effects Of
- Page 202 and 203: 22-9 Comparative Evaluation Of Reef
- Page 204 and 205: 22-17 Managing Fishing Gear To Enco
- Page 206 and 207: 22-25 Estimating Harvest Pressure O
- Page 208 and 209: 22-33 Are The Coral Reef Finfish Fi
- Page 210 and 211: 22-41 Using Length-Frequency Data T
- Page 212 and 213: 22-50 Changes in Ecosystem Structur
- Page 214 and 215: 23-5 Measuring Success in Managing
Oral Mini-Symposium 17: Emerging Techniques in Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis<br />
17-33<br />
Geospatial Analysis: An Effective Tool For Simulating The Spatial And Temporal<br />
Dynamics Of Tropical Cyclone Disturbance Of Coral Reef Communities Across The<br />
Great Barrier Reef Region<br />
Marji PUOTINEN* 1 , Katharina FABRICIUS 2 , Glenn DE'ATH 2 , Terry DONE 2<br />
1 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, <strong>University</strong> of Wollongong, Wollongong,<br />
Australia, 2 Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Australia<br />
Tropical cyclones (hurricanes, typhoons) can cause major mechanical damage to coral<br />
reefs, which when repeated over time, can significantly affect the structure and function<br />
of reef communities such as those of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR).<br />
Understanding the timing and frequency of these events (disturbance regime) requires<br />
mapping both the energy generated by each of a representative set of cyclones and the<br />
subsequent reef damage. However, direct measurements like these are rare in the GBR.<br />
For this reason, a meteorological model adapted to run in a GIS was used to reconstruct<br />
maximum wind speeds (as a proxy for wave heights) for 85 cyclones that passed near the<br />
GBR from 1969 to 2003. A comparison with limited field data of damage from cyclones<br />
Ivor and Joy (1990) and Justin (1997) was used to establish thresholds of maximum<br />
winds capable of damaging reefs. From these, a disturbance history was constructed. In<br />
2005, severe tropical cyclone Ingrid crossed the Far Northern GBR, a region that had not<br />
been affected by major disturbances of any kind for several decades, and where benthic<br />
data had been collected before the event. This provided a unique opportunity to test the<br />
skill of the model in predicting reef damage and to refine the damage thresholds. An<br />
extensive field survey (82 sites on 32 reefs along the modelled wind gradient) showed<br />
that the types and intensity of damage were well explained by modelled maximum wind<br />
speed, and by spatial and biotic factors. For example, maximum winds 40 m s -1 caused<br />
catastrophic damage on inshore and offshore reefs, respectively. These results are being<br />
used to better understand both current and future (possible greater frequency / intensity)<br />
cyclone disturbance regime dynamics.<br />
17-34<br />
Marine Integrated Decision Analysis System (Midas)<br />
Suchi GOPAL* 1 , Les KAUFMANN 1 , Hrishi PATEL 1<br />
1 Boston <strong>University</strong>, Boston, MA<br />
Marine areas are critical regions on the Earth's surface as nearly two-thirds of the world's<br />
people live within 150 km of a coastline and are dependent on marine resources. Marine<br />
conservation has become seminal in this context. We present a spatial decision support<br />
system framework called MIDAS - Marine Integrated Decision Analysis System that<br />
integrates spatial and nonspatial data for marine management. The components of<br />
MIDAS are: (1) JIM (Java Interface for Managers) a graphic interface and JAVA code<br />
(programming) that allows a MMA manager to change parameters or conditions as a<br />
thought experiment and see outputs or consequences of a user-driven change in parameter<br />
states; (2) a GIS database that appears in map form, called JIM-Mapper, implemented<br />
using ArcIMS, that allows for dynamic GIS displays and spatial analysis; 3) a Bayesian<br />
Belief Networks (BBNs) to provide an appropriate method for developing predictive<br />
models of marine management effectiveness. The marine BBN's general structure is that<br />
of an integrated knowledge extraction/expert system. Knowledge is extracted from<br />
scientific literature as well as from experts for representing concepts as well as their<br />
relationships. BBNs represent information in the form of probabilities, enabling many<br />
different sources of data to be integrated and analyzed according to a common<br />
framework. We discuss the implementation of the three components of MIDAS for<br />
Belize and Brazil marine coastal management.<br />
17-35<br />
A Procedure To Target Coral Reef Deterioration Using Ikonos Satellite Imagery, Zone<br />
Boundaries, And Coral Reef Use<br />
Candace NEWMAN* 1<br />
1 Geography, <strong>University</strong> of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada<br />
We have developed a procedure to identify specific locations of coral habitat that have a ‘high<br />
probability of acute deterioration’ caused by human impact. The procedure uses satellite<br />
imagery, coral zonal boundaries, and coral reef use by dive operators and fishermen. The<br />
procedure involves development of a habitat map, then overlaying zonal boundaries and reef<br />
use data in a GIS. Using a set of criteria, sites with a ‘high probability of acute deterioration’ are<br />
identified, and then validated using in-situ field survey data. The potential for this procedure to<br />
address local coral reef management issues is significant, and relevant to current management<br />
projects on Bunaken Island, Indonesia.<br />
It is increasingly evident that context-relevant maps are essential to address acute coral reef<br />
degradation concerns in developing nations. On Bunaken Island, specific coral reef<br />
management projects are consistently undertaken, and many projects are focused on conflict<br />
resolution between coral reef resource user groups – dive operators and fishermen. Therefore, a<br />
challenge is to utilize remotely sensed information, combined with context-specific information,<br />
to contribute relevant and useful management information to these projects.<br />
In this study, we develop a procedure to address this challenge. IKONOS satellite imagery was<br />
captured in 2001 and 2004 and has been integrated with zonal boundary data of Bunaken Island,<br />
which recognizes different coral reef use activities and coral reef use data by dive operator and<br />
fishermen groups. Following integration and analysis in a GIS, sites of ‘high probability of<br />
acute deterioration’ have been identified. Results were validated using field survey data, as well<br />
as contributions from Universitas Sam Ratulangi and local NGOs.<br />
17-36<br />
The Coral Reef Landscape: Spatial Patterns Of Water Quality in The Florida<br />
Daniel WAGNER* 1 , Eric MIELBRECHT 2 , Robert VAN WOESIK 1<br />
1 Department of Biology, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, 2 Emerald Coast<br />
Environmental Consulting, Washington, DC<br />
While we have some peripheral understanding of water-quality ‘weather’, which includes<br />
nutrients, salinity, temperature and turbidity, we know little about the coral-reef landscape<br />
‘climate’ and the influences of that climate on coral-community structure. Determining the<br />
scales of the inherent variability of key environmental variables is clearly necessary. We use<br />
landscape-ecology techniques coupled with Geographic Information Systems (GIS)<br />
technologies to examine the spatial dynamics of specific water-quality parameters along the<br />
Florida Keys reef tract. The spatial distance at which temperature variance stabilized throughout<br />
the region was dependent on whether the samples were from the surface or near-substrate.<br />
Greater homogeneity was found for near-substrate temperatures, with patches at ≤ 1.075 km<br />
compared to ≤ 0.893 km for the surface. Salinity was more homogeneous at the surface (≤ 1.662<br />
km) than near the substrate (≤ 0.234 km). Surface chlorophyll a showed greater homogeneity at<br />
≤ 0.592 km while DIN patches were more homogeneous near the substrate (≤ 2.873 km) than at<br />
the surface (≤ 0.151 km). The greater variability of other parameters, including turbidity and<br />
total nitrogen, precluded accurate predictions at the applied spatial scale of sampling. This is not<br />
to say turbidity for example is not important, because it is, but we need to re-evaluate the<br />
sampling strategy to capture the inherent scale at which these parameters vary. Moreover,<br />
temperature variance decreased across the shelf from inshore zones to offshore as a function of<br />
distance from the shoreline. The significant difference between surface and near-substrate<br />
temperatures seriously questions the commonplace use of sea surface temperature data in<br />
evaluating direct influence on reef corals because it ignores the variability of the system due to<br />
the stratification of the water column.<br />
149