24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Oral Mini-Symposium 10: Ecological Processes on Today's Reef Ecosystems<br />

10-49<br />

Interactive Effects Of Competition And Microhabitat On Juvenile Survival in A<br />

Coral Reef Fish<br />

Mary BONIN* 1,2 , Glenn ALMANY 1,2 , Maya SRINIVASAN 2 , Geoffrey JONES 1,2<br />

1 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Australia, 2 Marine and<br />

Tropical Biology, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Townsville, Australia<br />

Microhabitat type and competition for preferred microhabitats can influence patterns of<br />

abundance and mortality in coral reef fish communities, however the relative influence<br />

and interaction between these two factors is not well understood. In Kimbe Bay, Papua<br />

New Guinea, we used surveys to quantify microhabitat use in two live-coral specialist<br />

damselfishes (Pomacentridae), Chrysiptera parasema and Dascyllus melanurus. We then<br />

used a patch reef experiment to test how intra- and interspecific competition interacts<br />

with two types of microhabitat to influence survival of juvenile C. parasema. Surveys<br />

demonstrated that C. parasema and D. melanurus utilize similar coral microhabitats; 72%<br />

of C. parasema and 85% of D. melanurus used corymbose and bottlebrush growth forms<br />

of Acropora. One microhabitat type, Pocillopora spp. coral, was used by D. melanurus<br />

but not C. parasema. The patch reef experiment revealed that microhabitat type had the<br />

strongest influence on survival of C. parasema. In the absence of interspecific<br />

competitors, approximately 90% of C. parasema survived for 5 days after transplantation<br />

to bottlebrush Acropora compared to only 30% survival on Pocillopora. In both<br />

microhabitats, interspecific competition with D. melanurus, but not intraspecific<br />

competition, decreased survival of C. parasema. The interspecific effect of D. melanurus<br />

was greater in the more structurally-complex microhabitat; on Acropora reefs,<br />

interspecific competition resulted in a 34% decrease in C. parasema survival compared to<br />

19% on Pocillopora reefs. This study demonstrates that interspecific competition and<br />

microhabitat type can interact to influence survival in coral reef fishes, though whether<br />

and how these factors influence survival will depend on the behavioural attributes and<br />

strength of habitat associations among potential competitors.<br />

10-50<br />

Differential Effect Of Early Post-Settlement Processes On The Abundance Of Two<br />

Concurrently Settling Coral Reef Fishes<br />

Henri VALLES* 1 , Donald KRAMER 1 , Wayne HUNTE 2<br />

1 Biology, McGill <strong>University</strong>, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2 Biology, <strong>University</strong> of the West<br />

Indies, Cave Hill, Barbados<br />

To examine the magnitude, spatial variability and causes of early density-independent<br />

(DI) and density-dependent (DD) post-settlement losses in coral reef fishes, we<br />

monitored density of Sparisoma (Scaridae) and Stegastes partitus (Pomacentridae) on<br />

three reefs in Barbados (West Indies) for 3-3.5 months following a period of high<br />

recruitment and fitted the data to a modified Beverton-Holt model. To assess whether<br />

surveys missed early DD mortality, we compared recruitment on reefs to that on standard<br />

monitoring units (SMURFs) that excluded predators. Recruitment was >11x (Sparisoma)<br />

and >3x (S. partitus) greater than the initial number of large juveniles/ adults. Mortality<br />

was very high (Sparisoma 97%; S. partitus 91%), indicating that post-settlement<br />

processes were more important than settlement in determining local density. Mortality<br />

did not vary significantly across sites. After 3-3.5 months, Sparisoma densities were<br />

similar to those before recruitment. S. partitus densities increased, but increases did not<br />

match among-site differences in recruitment, indicating that post-settlement processes<br />

differed spatially. DI effects did not vary significantly between taxa or sites. DD effects<br />

were one order of magnitude higher for Sparisoma than for S. partitus, possibly due to<br />

lower availability of refuge microhabitat for Sparisoma. DD effects varied significantly<br />

across sites for S. partitus, but not Sparisoma, perhaps because of lower precision in<br />

density estimates for Sparisoma. Among-site differences in DD effects for S. partitus<br />

were associated with differences in recruitment rates and substrate. Predator density was<br />

similar across sites. Recruit density on the reefs mirrored captures in SMURFs, indicating<br />

that surveys did not miss important DD predation. Our findings suggest that substrate<br />

influences rates of DD mortality and therefore local population dynamics, but with<br />

markedly different strength for different taxa.<br />

10-51<br />

Living in a Washing Machine: Differing Capacities to Capture Prey Under Divergent<br />

Velocity/Turbulence Conditions Reflect Microhabitat Differences of Two Chaenopsid<br />

Blennies<br />

Raymond CLARKE* 1 , Christopher FINELLI 2 , Edward BUSKEY 3<br />

1 Department of Biology, Sarah Lawrence College, Bronxville, NY, 2 Department of Biology and<br />

Marine Biology, <strong>University</strong> of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, 3 The <strong>University</strong><br />

of Texas at Austin Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, TX<br />

Wave-generated oscillating water flow on coral reefs creates a challenge for the fishes that live<br />

there, but it also creates opportunities. Roughhead blennies (Acanthemblemaria aspera) and<br />

spinyhead blennies (A. spinosa) live in holes in dead coral skeletons from which they make<br />

rapid forays to capture passing prey, primarily copepods. On coral reefs throughout the<br />

Caribbean, spinyheads occupy locations in tall corals while roughheads reside close to the reef<br />

surface. Spinyheads have metabolic rates 1.5 times higher than those of roughheads. Our study<br />

involves (1) measuring water speeds and flow patterns both generally and within blenny feeding<br />

volumes, (2) videotaping blennies feeding in the field and (3) studying blenny feeding patterns<br />

and success in flumes. The flume studies include wild-caught calanoids (Acartia tonsa) as prey<br />

and water flow regimes that replicate those measured in the field. Spinyheads experience<br />

greater velocity and turbulence and possess a more fixed attack pattern, focusing primarily on<br />

planktonic prey whereas roughheads feed primarily on benthic prey but periodically shift to<br />

planktonic prey under low flow conditions. Spinyheads attack at greater distances and at greater<br />

rates under all conditions. Both species attack more frequently during the slack stage of the<br />

wave cycle, but spinyheads attack over a greater proportion of the wave cycle than do<br />

roughheads. Spinyheads also have greater capture success than roughheads under fast smooth<br />

flow and all turbulent water conditions. These data reveal in some detail the ways in which<br />

these blennies are adapted to different microhabitats thus facilitating coexistence in the same<br />

reef zones.<br />

10-52<br />

Micropredator Gnathiid Isopods Reduce Larval Damselfish Persistence By Affecting<br />

Performance<br />

Alexandra GRUTTER* 1 , Angela CREAN 1 , Lynda M CURTIS 1 , Armand M KURIS 2 , Robert<br />

R WARNER 2 , Mark I MCCORMICK 3<br />

1 School of Integrative Biology, The <strong>University</strong> of Queesland, St. Lucia Queesland, Australia,<br />

2 Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, Univeristy of California Santa Barbara, Santa<br />

Barbara, CA, 3 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and School of Marine and<br />

Tropical Biology, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Townsville Queensland, Australia<br />

Traditional hypothesis for the pelagic phase of demersal coral reef fishes are not strongly<br />

supported by the data. An alternative hypothesis is that they migrate to the pelagic environment<br />

to disrupt or avoid transmission of infectious agents. On the Great Barrier Reef, gnathiid<br />

isopods (mobile micropredators) are one of the most common ectoparasites of fish. Gnathiid<br />

effects on small fishes were used as a model for the consequences of keeping larvae on the reef.<br />

Nothing is known of how gnathiids affect the performance and survival of juveniles in the wild.<br />

We therefore tested the effect of gnathiids on the swimming performance, oxygen consumption,<br />

and survival of the common damselfish Pomacentrus amboinensis in nature. Of juvenile fish<br />

sampled at dawn and during the day, 3.5% and 0% had a gnathiid respectively, however, this<br />

difference was not significant. In the laboratory, most gnathiids (79%) remained attached to<br />

juvenile fish for up to 6 h and all fish survived exposure to the gnathiids. When tested in pairs in<br />

a double-laned swim chamber, settlement-stage fish that had previously been fed on by a<br />

gnathiid ceased swimming first in 77% of the trials. They also had a 14% lower critical<br />

swimming speed compared to fish not exposed to a gnathiid. Previously parasitized settlementstage<br />

fish had a 32% higher oxygen consumption rate than did unexposed fish. When tagged<br />

settlement-stage fish were placed in pairs on dead coral patches in the wild and monitored, the<br />

previously parasitized fish disappeared from the reef first in 67% of the trials. Our analysis<br />

indicates that gnathiid isopods significantly decrease the performance of young P. amboinensis.<br />

This may affect their survival and successful establishment on the reef. Micropredation by<br />

gnathiids may therefore contribute to selection pressure for a pelagic stage.<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!