11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Oral Mini-Symposium 10: Ecological Processes on Today's Reef Ecosystems<br />
10-49<br />
Interactive Effects Of Competition And Microhabitat On Juvenile Survival in A<br />
Coral Reef Fish<br />
Mary BONIN* 1,2 , Glenn ALMANY 1,2 , Maya SRINIVASAN 2 , Geoffrey JONES 1,2<br />
1 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Australia, 2 Marine and<br />
Tropical Biology, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Townsville, Australia<br />
Microhabitat type and competition for preferred microhabitats can influence patterns of<br />
abundance and mortality in coral reef fish communities, however the relative influence<br />
and interaction between these two factors is not well understood. In Kimbe Bay, Papua<br />
New Guinea, we used surveys to quantify microhabitat use in two live-coral specialist<br />
damselfishes (Pomacentridae), Chrysiptera parasema and Dascyllus melanurus. We then<br />
used a patch reef experiment to test how intra- and interspecific competition interacts<br />
with two types of microhabitat to influence survival of juvenile C. parasema. Surveys<br />
demonstrated that C. parasema and D. melanurus utilize similar coral microhabitats; 72%<br />
of C. parasema and 85% of D. melanurus used corymbose and bottlebrush growth forms<br />
of Acropora. One microhabitat type, Pocillopora spp. coral, was used by D. melanurus<br />
but not C. parasema. The patch reef experiment revealed that microhabitat type had the<br />
strongest influence on survival of C. parasema. In the absence of interspecific<br />
competitors, approximately 90% of C. parasema survived for 5 days after transplantation<br />
to bottlebrush Acropora compared to only 30% survival on Pocillopora. In both<br />
microhabitats, interspecific competition with D. melanurus, but not intraspecific<br />
competition, decreased survival of C. parasema. The interspecific effect of D. melanurus<br />
was greater in the more structurally-complex microhabitat; on Acropora reefs,<br />
interspecific competition resulted in a 34% decrease in C. parasema survival compared to<br />
19% on Pocillopora reefs. This study demonstrates that interspecific competition and<br />
microhabitat type can interact to influence survival in coral reef fishes, though whether<br />
and how these factors influence survival will depend on the behavioural attributes and<br />
strength of habitat associations among potential competitors.<br />
10-50<br />
Differential Effect Of Early Post-Settlement Processes On The Abundance Of Two<br />
Concurrently Settling Coral Reef Fishes<br />
Henri VALLES* 1 , Donald KRAMER 1 , Wayne HUNTE 2<br />
1 Biology, McGill <strong>University</strong>, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2 Biology, <strong>University</strong> of the West<br />
Indies, Cave Hill, Barbados<br />
To examine the magnitude, spatial variability and causes of early density-independent<br />
(DI) and density-dependent (DD) post-settlement losses in coral reef fishes, we<br />
monitored density of Sparisoma (Scaridae) and Stegastes partitus (Pomacentridae) on<br />
three reefs in Barbados (West Indies) for 3-3.5 months following a period of high<br />
recruitment and fitted the data to a modified Beverton-Holt model. To assess whether<br />
surveys missed early DD mortality, we compared recruitment on reefs to that on standard<br />
monitoring units (SMURFs) that excluded predators. Recruitment was >11x (Sparisoma)<br />
and >3x (S. partitus) greater than the initial number of large juveniles/ adults. Mortality<br />
was very high (Sparisoma 97%; S. partitus 91%), indicating that post-settlement<br />
processes were more important than settlement in determining local density. Mortality<br />
did not vary significantly across sites. After 3-3.5 months, Sparisoma densities were<br />
similar to those before recruitment. S. partitus densities increased, but increases did not<br />
match among-site differences in recruitment, indicating that post-settlement processes<br />
differed spatially. DI effects did not vary significantly between taxa or sites. DD effects<br />
were one order of magnitude higher for Sparisoma than for S. partitus, possibly due to<br />
lower availability of refuge microhabitat for Sparisoma. DD effects varied significantly<br />
across sites for S. partitus, but not Sparisoma, perhaps because of lower precision in<br />
density estimates for Sparisoma. Among-site differences in DD effects for S. partitus<br />
were associated with differences in recruitment rates and substrate. Predator density was<br />
similar across sites. Recruit density on the reefs mirrored captures in SMURFs, indicating<br />
that surveys did not miss important DD predation. Our findings suggest that substrate<br />
influences rates of DD mortality and therefore local population dynamics, but with<br />
markedly different strength for different taxa.<br />
10-51<br />
Living in a Washing Machine: Differing Capacities to Capture Prey Under Divergent<br />
Velocity/Turbulence Conditions Reflect Microhabitat Differences of Two Chaenopsid<br />
Blennies<br />
Raymond CLARKE* 1 , Christopher FINELLI 2 , Edward BUSKEY 3<br />
1 Department of Biology, Sarah Lawrence College, Bronxville, NY, 2 Department of Biology and<br />
Marine Biology, <strong>University</strong> of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, 3 The <strong>University</strong><br />
of Texas at Austin Marine Science Institute, Port Aransas, TX<br />
Wave-generated oscillating water flow on coral reefs creates a challenge for the fishes that live<br />
there, but it also creates opportunities. Roughhead blennies (Acanthemblemaria aspera) and<br />
spinyhead blennies (A. spinosa) live in holes in dead coral skeletons from which they make<br />
rapid forays to capture passing prey, primarily copepods. On coral reefs throughout the<br />
Caribbean, spinyheads occupy locations in tall corals while roughheads reside close to the reef<br />
surface. Spinyheads have metabolic rates 1.5 times higher than those of roughheads. Our study<br />
involves (1) measuring water speeds and flow patterns both generally and within blenny feeding<br />
volumes, (2) videotaping blennies feeding in the field and (3) studying blenny feeding patterns<br />
and success in flumes. The flume studies include wild-caught calanoids (Acartia tonsa) as prey<br />
and water flow regimes that replicate those measured in the field. Spinyheads experience<br />
greater velocity and turbulence and possess a more fixed attack pattern, focusing primarily on<br />
planktonic prey whereas roughheads feed primarily on benthic prey but periodically shift to<br />
planktonic prey under low flow conditions. Spinyheads attack at greater distances and at greater<br />
rates under all conditions. Both species attack more frequently during the slack stage of the<br />
wave cycle, but spinyheads attack over a greater proportion of the wave cycle than do<br />
roughheads. Spinyheads also have greater capture success than roughheads under fast smooth<br />
flow and all turbulent water conditions. These data reveal in some detail the ways in which<br />
these blennies are adapted to different microhabitats thus facilitating coexistence in the same<br />
reef zones.<br />
10-52<br />
Micropredator Gnathiid Isopods Reduce Larval Damselfish Persistence By Affecting<br />
Performance<br />
Alexandra GRUTTER* 1 , Angela CREAN 1 , Lynda M CURTIS 1 , Armand M KURIS 2 , Robert<br />
R WARNER 2 , Mark I MCCORMICK 3<br />
1 School of Integrative Biology, The <strong>University</strong> of Queesland, St. Lucia Queesland, Australia,<br />
2 Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, Univeristy of California Santa Barbara, Santa<br />
Barbara, CA, 3 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and School of Marine and<br />
Tropical Biology, James Cook <strong>University</strong>, Townsville Queensland, Australia<br />
Traditional hypothesis for the pelagic phase of demersal coral reef fishes are not strongly<br />
supported by the data. An alternative hypothesis is that they migrate to the pelagic environment<br />
to disrupt or avoid transmission of infectious agents. On the Great Barrier Reef, gnathiid<br />
isopods (mobile micropredators) are one of the most common ectoparasites of fish. Gnathiid<br />
effects on small fishes were used as a model for the consequences of keeping larvae on the reef.<br />
Nothing is known of how gnathiids affect the performance and survival of juveniles in the wild.<br />
We therefore tested the effect of gnathiids on the swimming performance, oxygen consumption,<br />
and survival of the common damselfish Pomacentrus amboinensis in nature. Of juvenile fish<br />
sampled at dawn and during the day, 3.5% and 0% had a gnathiid respectively, however, this<br />
difference was not significant. In the laboratory, most gnathiids (79%) remained attached to<br />
juvenile fish for up to 6 h and all fish survived exposure to the gnathiids. When tested in pairs in<br />
a double-laned swim chamber, settlement-stage fish that had previously been fed on by a<br />
gnathiid ceased swimming first in 77% of the trials. They also had a 14% lower critical<br />
swimming speed compared to fish not exposed to a gnathiid. Previously parasitized settlementstage<br />
fish had a 32% higher oxygen consumption rate than did unexposed fish. When tagged<br />
settlement-stage fish were placed in pairs on dead coral patches in the wild and monitored, the<br />
previously parasitized fish disappeared from the reef first in 67% of the trials. Our analysis<br />
indicates that gnathiid isopods significantly decrease the performance of young P. amboinensis.<br />
This may affect their survival and successful establishment on the reef. Micropredation by<br />
gnathiids may therefore contribute to selection pressure for a pelagic stage.<br />
85