24.12.2012 Views

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Oral Mini-Symposium 10: Ecological Processes on Today's Reef Ecosystems<br />

10-45<br />

Interactions Among Inhabitants Of Branching Coral: Multiple Predator Or<br />

Competitor Effects?<br />

Russell SCHMITT* 1 , Sally HOLBROOK 1 , Andrew BROOKS 2 , Jennifer LAPE 1<br />

1 Ecology, Evolution & Marine Biology, <strong>University</strong> of California Santa Barbara, Santa<br />

Barbara, CA, 2 Marine Science Institute, <strong>University</strong> of California Santa Barbara, Santa<br />

Barbara, CA<br />

The ability to forecast change in coral reef communities requires sufficient understanding<br />

of how multiple factors operate together, yet the complexity of real systems often is<br />

simplified by lumping species into such functional groups as predators or competitors.<br />

Oversimplification can obscure important influences on the strength of interactions, such<br />

as non-additive effects of multiple predators (MPEs) on shared prey that can either<br />

reduce or enhance their mortality risk. In French Polynesia, we explored interactions<br />

involving two putative predators (arc-eye hawkfish Paracirrhites arcatus, red-spotted<br />

coral crab Trapezia rufopunctata) and several damselfishes (Dascyllus flavicaudus, D.<br />

aruanus, Chromis viridis). Field and laboratory observations revealed that both hawkfish<br />

and coral crabs were capable of capturing and consuming recently settled damselfish.<br />

Because these species all use the branches of the coral Pocillopora eydouxi as shelter<br />

from ‘external’ predators, the hawkfish, coral crabs and damselfishes also may be<br />

competitors for enemy-free space. A survey suggested that the density of damselfish on<br />

P. eydouxi was reduced in the presence of either an arc-eye hawkfish or red-spotted coral<br />

crab. A field experiment confirmed that both hawkfish and coral crabs reduced<br />

survivorship of recently settled damselfish, and that their combined per capita effects<br />

were additive. Additivity occurred because the strongest effect of these species on<br />

damselfish was from competition for enemy-free space that increased their vulnerability<br />

to external predators; only 25% of damselfish mortality attributable to hawkfish resulted<br />

from consumption by hawkfish, while none of the mortality caused by crabs resulted<br />

from predation by crabs. Hence, in this case, there were no emergent effects of multiple<br />

predators. These results underscore the need to understand the particular mechanisms by<br />

which species exert their influence on others.<br />

10-46<br />

Indirect Effects On Coral Dynamics From Interactions Between Resident Fishes<br />

Sally HOLBROOK* 1 , Russell SCHMITT 1 , Andrew BROOKS 2<br />

1 Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, UCSB, Santa Barbara, CA, 2 Marine Science<br />

Institute, UCSB, Santa Barbara, CA<br />

Mortality rates of coral often scale inversely with colony size, and hence factors that<br />

enhance the growth of smaller, more vulnerable size classes can be important to the<br />

dynamics of coral populations. In a field experiment, we found that branching coral in<br />

the genus Pocillopora grew a third faster when a colony was occupied by a group of<br />

damselfishes; the amount of growth enhancement varied positively with the number<br />

(biomass) of resident damselfish. We undertook field studies to determine what<br />

influences the occurrence of damselfish groups on Pocillopora in Moorea, French<br />

Polynesia. Field surveys revealed three distinct fish occupancy patterns that were related<br />

to coral size: (1) no coral 80% of large corals<br />

(>75 cm circumference) hosted a group of damselfish, more than half of which also had<br />

co-occurring hawkfish. Field experiments and observations revealed that arc-eye<br />

hawkfish could prevent the establishment of a damselfish group on intermediate-sized<br />

corals by suppressing recruitment of young damselfish (reducing settlement rates,<br />

increasing early mortality rates). By contrast, hawkfish could not stop groups of<br />

damselfish from colonizing larger corals because they could not prevent immigration of<br />

older (larger) damselfish and they appeared less efficient at reducing larval recruitment in<br />

large corals. Thus the growth - and perhaps survival - rates of intermediate-sized<br />

Pocillopora can be influenced substantially by a small piscivore. These results indicate<br />

that biotic interactions among species of fish that use corals as habitat can have<br />

substantial but non-obvious indirect effects on the dynamics of corals.<br />

10-47<br />

Recruitment And Population Dynamics Of A Coral-Reef Fish: A Large-Scale Long-Term<br />

Field Experiment<br />

Mark HIXON* 1 , Todd ANDERSON 2 , Kevin BUCH 3 , Darren JOHNSON 4 , Christopher<br />

STALLINGS 5<br />

1 Department of Zoology, Oregon State <strong>University</strong>, Corvallis, OR, 2 San Diego State <strong>University</strong>,<br />

San Diego, CA, 3 Texas A&M <strong>University</strong> at Galveston, Galveston, TX, 4 Oregon State<br />

<strong>University</strong>, Corvallis, OR, 5 Florida State <strong>University</strong>, St Teresa, FL<br />

The relationship between the input of newly settled recruits and post-settlement demographic<br />

rates in populations of coral-reef fishes is complex, and has thus been controversial. To<br />

examine this relationship at the spatial scale of entire local populations and the temporal scale<br />

of entire generations, we conducted an 8-year field experiment in the Bahamas. First, from<br />

1998 to 2002, we monitored demographic rates (recruitment, survival, growth, and egg<br />

production) in four populations of the bicolor damselfish (Stegastes partitus). During this 4year<br />

baseline period, two "near sites" adjacent to the Exuma Sound source of larvae exhibited<br />

relatively high recruitment rates and largely density-dependent dynamics. In contrast, two "far<br />

sites" located some 20 km from the Sound on the Great Bahamas Bank exhibited low<br />

recruitment and density-independent dynamics, in accordance with the "recruitment limitation"<br />

hypothesis. Second, during four consecutive recruitment seasons (2002-2005), we reduced<br />

recruitment 10-fold at one near site by removing new recruits as they settled, and bolstered<br />

recruitment 10-fold at one far site by transplanting new recruits. We continued demographic<br />

monitoring at all four sites into 2006. Examining all 8 years, population dynamics remained<br />

mostly density-dependent (compensatory) at the near sites, yet became inversely densitydependent<br />

(depensatory) at the far sites. The cause of depensation appears to have been a<br />

combination of relatively low habitat complexity and high physical (including hurricane)<br />

disturbance at the far sites, such that new recruits suffered higher mortality rates at lower<br />

densities. We conclude that a combination of factors, rather than larval supply alone,<br />

determines the level and kind of dependence on population density exhibited by demographic<br />

rates.<br />

10-48<br />

Habitat Competes For Fish Larvae: Increased Fish Production Despite Settlement<br />

Redirection<br />

Adrian STIER* 1 , Craig OSENBERG 2<br />

1 Zoology, <strong>University</strong> of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 2 <strong>University</strong> of Florida, Gainesville, FL<br />

Declines in the quality and quantify of coral reefs can decrease the abundance and diversity of<br />

the organisms that dependent on the reef habitat. As a result, coral reef restoration (e.g., via<br />

deployment of artificial reefs or coral fragments) has been proposed to reverse long-term<br />

degradation. The effect of new habitat remains unclear, primarily because added habitat may<br />

simply redistribute individuals, rather than increasing the regional size of a population. This<br />

uncertainty has led to the “attraction-production” controversy. Redirection alone does not<br />

increase production; it just redistributes it. However, if fish compete, then redistribution of<br />

larvae can enhance regional populations by lowering densities on existing reefs and thereby<br />

reducing the effect of density on post-settlement survival. Settlement redirection has never been<br />

previously tested in a field experiment. Thus, we designed a field experiment to quantify the<br />

degree to which new habitat increases settlement (or redirects it). Addition of new habitat<br />

increased total settlement, but decreased density. However the effect on settlement was much<br />

less than expected based on the increase in reef habitat: habitat increased 6-fold, but settlement<br />

increased less then two-fold. Thus, settlers are redirected to new habitat, but total settlement<br />

increases, and local density decreases. Based on the observed strength of density-dependence in<br />

these systems, we demonstrate how habitat addition should lead to a reduction in density, an<br />

increase in regional density, and a significant increase in fish production by ameliorating<br />

negative effects of density.<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!