11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
11th ICRS Abstract book - Nova Southeastern University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10-41<br />
Substrate Effects On Reef Fish Distribution<br />
Karen NEELY* 1<br />
1 Ecology, Duke <strong>University</strong>, Beaufort, NC<br />
Oral Mini-Symposium 10: Ecological Processes on Today's Reef Ecosystems<br />
Western Atlantic coral reefs host up to 750 species of fish. It has been hypothesized that<br />
substrate characteristics control the abundance and distribution of these fish, but this has<br />
traditionally been examined at a community level. I conducted a correlational study in<br />
Curacao, Netherlands Antilles, that addressed fish abundances at the level of species and<br />
age class. I also experimentally tested habitat preferences in two ways. Choice<br />
experiments on adults of common species determined the influence of live coral and<br />
rugosity in an isolated environment, while habitat preferences of adults and juveniles in a<br />
multi-species environment were tested using in situ artificial reefs that differed in live<br />
coral cover. As a whole, these studies showed rugosity to greatly affect total abundance<br />
and diversity, while live coral cover had a slight effect on these community parameters.<br />
However, this small effect of live coral masks large differences at the species and age<br />
class level. For coral cover and other measures of substrate, both positive and negative<br />
selections were seen among species, but these preferences did not follow a readily<br />
identifiable taxonomic or niche classification. Algae-feeding species within the genus<br />
Stegastes, for example, showed both positive and negative preferences for live coral.<br />
Ontogenetic changes in habitat preferences were also documented. These results suggest<br />
that changes in live coral cover on a reef would affect fish communities in ways not<br />
observable using the standard community measures of fish distribution.<br />
10-42<br />
Competitive Displacement Vs. Habitat Structure: The Selection Agents That Shape<br />
Microhabitat Recognition Of A Damselfish Over Time<br />
Mati HALPERIN* 1 , Yehuda BENAYAHU 1<br />
1 Department of Zoology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv<br />
<strong>University</strong>, Tel Aviv, Israel<br />
The three-spot dascyllus, Dascyllus trimaculatus Rüppell, has generally been described<br />
as recruiting to sea-anemones. However, in a preliminary survey in Eilat, northern Red<br />
Sea, we recorded D. trimaculatus individuals mainly in branching coral colonies.<br />
Intrigued by the lack of D. trimaculatus juveniles in their typical microhabitat, we studied<br />
the fish abundance and distribution there through a survey of types of microhabitat and<br />
their structural features, in addition to a fish census, aimed at developing and<br />
experimentally testing a hypothesis regarding microhabitat preferences. We addressed the<br />
question of whether the distribution of D. trimaculatus is regulated by the presence of<br />
competitor fish species through mechanisms of displacement, or whether it is<br />
microhabitat-dependent, taking into account specific microhabitat recognition by<br />
damselfish at their various life stages. A distinct pattern of distribution of corals and<br />
damselfish was revealed, in which the marine lab site constituted the major habitat for D.<br />
marginatus while the jetty site hosted D. trimaculatus. We also found that it is the<br />
abundance of Pocillopora coral microhabitats that determines the population distribution<br />
of D. trimaculatus in Eilat. Consequently, it is suggested that the abundance and<br />
distribution of both Dascyllus species may follow the general pattern of the competition<br />
model, emphasizing their apparent need for specific microhabitats. In addition to the<br />
competitive displacement, which excludes D. trimaculatus individuals from their<br />
congeners’ microhabitat (i.e. Stylophora colonies), and determines the population<br />
distribution at the microhabitat level, we also suggest that the specific recognition of a<br />
microhabitat by juvenile D. trimaculatus may play a major role in determining the<br />
distribution of its population at the macrohabitat level. The demographics of Dascyllus<br />
fish in Eilat may reflect a unique situation in which the selection forces of microhabitat<br />
recognition by D. trimaculatus have undergone alteration over time.<br />
10-43<br />
Fish Grazers As Gatekeepers Of The Species Composition Of Coral Reefs<br />
Paul YOSHIOKA* 1<br />
1 Marine Sciences, <strong>University</strong> of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, Lajas, Puerto Rico<br />
In this report I propose that intermediate-sized (about 15 cm long) fish mesograzers play a<br />
critical role in determining the species composition of sessile coral reef communities. Fish<br />
mesograzers include parrotfishes (Scaridae), wrasses (Labridae) and surgeonfish (Acanthuridae)<br />
that feed on small prey. I describe these fish as gatekeepers in the sense that they control the<br />
entry of small (newly recruited) prey individuals into coral reefs. In contrast, keystone grazers<br />
control the ‘post entry’ abundances of larger sized prey. The gatekeeper scenario is based on<br />
several well-recognized features of coral reef ecology: (1) Fish grazing has major impacts on<br />
overall abundances of benthic organisms; (2) Artificial substrates in tropical open coast habitats<br />
are often colonized by fouling communities characterized by species such as the octocoral<br />
Carijoa (Telesto) riisei, the sponge Tedania ignis, the tunicate Ascidea nigra and the anemone<br />
Aiptasia tagetes; and (3) Many prey species in coral reefs enjoy a refuge in size from grazers<br />
due to structural/chemical defenses. Differences between keystone and gatekeeper effects<br />
probably arise from features (2) and (3) because many fouling (and typical coral reef) species<br />
are vulnerable to gatekeepers when small and inconspicuous, but enjoy a refuge in size from<br />
keystone species when large. Due to these size-specific effects, assemblages of prey species<br />
controlled by gatekeepers and keystone predators will differ to some degree. Escape from<br />
gatekeeper grazing will also have indirect effects on community structure because of<br />
interactions (e.g., competition) among prey populations. From a more general perspective, both<br />
the gatekeeper and keystone concepts emphasize species-specific effects on prey populations.<br />
In addition, the gatekeeper scenario posits that the size of prey individuals also plays a key role<br />
in the ecological structure of coral reef communities.<br />
10-44<br />
Coral Morphology Modulates The Benefits Of Resident Fishes To Coral Growth?<br />
Andrew BROOKS* 1 , Sally HOLBROOK 2 , Russell SCHMITT 2 , Hannah STEWART 3<br />
1 Marine Science Instititute, <strong>University</strong> of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA,<br />
2 Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, <strong>University</strong> of California, Santa<br />
Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 3 Friday Harbor Labs, <strong>University</strong> of Washington, Friday Harbor,<br />
WA<br />
Hermatypic corals are functional mixotrophs that rely on water flow for the delivery of<br />
dissolved nutrients and prey. As the external morphology of individual colonies affects the rate<br />
of water flow through the colony, coral morphology may exert a strong influence on the flux of<br />
materials within the interior spaces of the colony itself. We explored the relationships between<br />
local water flow, abundance of resident fishes, external coral morphology and coral growth<br />
rates for a common species of branching coral, Pocillopora eydouxi, in lagoons of Moorea,<br />
French Polynesia. Colonies of P. eydouxi provide structural habitat and refuge space for a<br />
variety of reef fishes. In turn, these fishes may augment nutrient supply to their host coral while<br />
sheltering through the natural excretion of ammonia. To measure coral growth rates, we<br />
outplanted small coral nubbins into colonies of P. eydouxi. Mesh cages were used to exclude<br />
resident fishes from half of these colonies. Flow rates within host corals were measured using<br />
fluorescent dye and external morphology was quantified using digital photographs. Our<br />
experiments revealed that colonies of P. eydouxi containing resident fishes grew substantially<br />
faster than neighbors that did not. Coral growth rates were significantly correlated with within<br />
colony concentrations of ammonia. Our estimates of water flow within coral colonies indicated<br />
that this flow varied considerably among experimental colonies experiencing the same general<br />
flow regime, suggesting that coral morphology may modulate the effects of resident fishes on<br />
coral growth rates by influencing the overall flux of nutrients within a coral colony.<br />
83