24.12.2012 Views

Water Quality in Slovenia - Agencija RS za okolje

Water Quality in Slovenia - Agencija RS za okolje

Water Quality in Slovenia - Agencija RS za okolje

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22<br />

2.1.2<br />

W A T E R Q U A L I T Y I N S L O V E N I A<br />

River <strong>Quality</strong> Assessment Us<strong>in</strong>g Saprobic Index and Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs of Ecological<br />

Status Evaluation<br />

In <strong>Slovenia</strong>, as well as <strong>in</strong> other European countries, the methodology for the assessment of the<br />

ecological status of the rivers accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>Water</strong> Framework Directive is currently <strong>in</strong> preparation.<br />

Until 2005, the biological quality of rivers was evaluated us<strong>in</strong>g the saprobic <strong>in</strong>dex, which primarily<br />

shows the organic pollution. The Pantle and Buck method was used, with a modification accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the Zel<strong>in</strong>ka and Marvan method (25, 26) us<strong>in</strong>g calculation of the saprobic <strong>in</strong>dex (SI) value of the<br />

biocenoses of benthic <strong>in</strong>vertebrates and phytobenthos. The saprobic <strong>in</strong>dex (SI) value <strong>in</strong>creases from<br />

one to four with the deterioration of liv<strong>in</strong>g conditions. For every analysed sample, the saprobic <strong>in</strong>dex<br />

(SI) is calculated us<strong>in</strong>g the saprobic value, frequency and <strong>in</strong>dicative weight of taxon.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>dex value, each monitor<strong>in</strong>g site is classified <strong>in</strong>to an appropriate quality class (Table 4).<br />

Table 4: <strong>Quality</strong> classes accord<strong>in</strong>g to the saprobic <strong>in</strong>dex value<br />

<strong>Quality</strong> class SI value Saprobic level River quality description<br />

1 1.0 - 1.5 oligosaprobic uncharged to very little charged<br />

1-2 1.51- 1.8<br />

oligosaprobic to<br />

betamesosaprobic<br />

little charged<br />

2 1.81- 2.3 betamesosaprobic moderately charged<br />

2-3 2.31- 2.7<br />

betamesosaprobic to<br />

alfamesosaprobic<br />

critically charged<br />

3 2.71- 3.2 alfamesosaprobic heavily polluted<br />

3-4 3.21- 3.5<br />

alfamesosaprobic to<br />

polysaprobic<br />

very heavily polluted<br />

4 3.51- 4.0 polysaprobic excessively polluted<br />

The saprobic quality evaluation at selected monitor<strong>in</strong>g sites <strong>in</strong> 2005 is shown <strong>in</strong> Map 2.<br />

In comparison with 2004, the saprobic quality of rivers was improved <strong>in</strong> 2005. Based on the results of<br />

saprobic analyses conducted <strong>in</strong> 42 rivers and at 69 different monitor<strong>in</strong>g sites, most of the monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sites are classified as uncharged to very little charged, and only one monitor<strong>in</strong>g site is classified as<br />

heavily polluted (the R<strong>in</strong>ža <strong>in</strong> Kočevje). There were neither very heavily polluted nor excessively<br />

polluted rivers <strong>in</strong> 2005.<br />

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

A dragonfly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!