24.12.2012 Views

Water Quality in Slovenia - Agencija RS za okolje

Water Quality in Slovenia - Agencija RS za okolje

Water Quality in Slovenia - Agencija RS za okolje

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ledava, Čentiba Mura, Mota<br />

S U R F A C E W A T E R S<br />

Based on the results of the monitor<strong>in</strong>g of river water quality <strong>in</strong> 2006, the chemical status of rivers was<br />

evaluated at 76 monitor<strong>in</strong>g sites. A good chemical status was determ<strong>in</strong>ed for 64 monitor<strong>in</strong>g sites,<br />

and a bad chemical status was determ<strong>in</strong>ed for 12 monitor<strong>in</strong>g sites. The chemical status of rivers at<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual monitor<strong>in</strong>g sites <strong>in</strong> 2006 is shown <strong>in</strong> Map 1.<br />

A bad chemical status was determ<strong>in</strong>ed on account of exceed<strong>in</strong>g the limit values for adsorbable<br />

organic halogen compounds (AOX), metolachlor, atraz<strong>in</strong>e, total pesticides, anion active detergents,<br />

m<strong>in</strong>eral oils, boron and z<strong>in</strong>c. Monitor<strong>in</strong>g sites for which a bad chemical status was determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong><br />

2006 and the parameters exceed<strong>in</strong>g the limit values are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2. No characteristic trend was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed for concentrations of priority substances <strong>in</strong> sediments.<br />

Table 2: Monitor<strong>in</strong>g sites for which a bad chemical status was determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 2006, with an <strong>in</strong>dication of the parameters<br />

that exceeded limit values<br />

RIVER Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Site Parameter<br />

Annual Average<br />

Value<br />

Limit Value<br />

MURA<br />

Ceršak<br />

Mota<br />

AOX (μg Cl/L)<br />

AOX (μg Cl/L)<br />

24<br />

24<br />

20<br />

20<br />

LEDAVA Čentiba AOX (μg Cl/L) 24 20<br />

DRAVINJA Videm pri Ptuju Metolachlor (μg/L) 0.24 0.1<br />

PESNICA Zamušani<br />

Metolachlor (μg/L)<br />

Total pesticides (μg/L)<br />

0.43<br />

1<br />

0.1<br />

0.5<br />

SAVA Jesenice na Dolenjskem AOX (μg Cl/L) 57 20<br />

SOTLA Rogaška Slat<strong>in</strong>a Boron (μg/L) 177 100<br />

CERKNIŠČICA Cerknica (Dolenja vas) Detergents (mg MBAS/L) 0.13 0.10<br />

LOGAŠČICA Jačka AOX (μg Cl/L) 21 20<br />

VOGLAJNA Celje Z<strong>in</strong>k (μg Zn/L) 493 100<br />

KRKA Krška vas Atraz<strong>in</strong>e (μg/L) 0.11 0.1<br />

KOREN Nova Gorica<br />

Detergents (mg MBAS/L)<br />

M<strong>in</strong>eral oils (mg/L)<br />

3.05<br />

0.75<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

AOX: Adsorbable organic halogen compounds<br />

Detergents (mg MBAS/L): Anion active detergents (mg MBAS/L)<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!