Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology
Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology
Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Re-expansion Pulmonary Edema:<br />
Re-expansion pulmonary edema is an uncommon, but occasionally<br />
life-threatening complication <strong>of</strong> pleural drainage.<br />
Many (perhaps most) patients with re-expansion edema have<br />
only minimal symptoms. Fortunately, very few patients develop<br />
life-threatening dyspnea. When it occurs, however, re-expansion<br />
edema is quite difficult to treat. The best treatment is, in<br />
fact, prevention. Risk factors include:<br />
• Rapid re-expansion <strong>of</strong> lung<br />
• Evacuation <strong>of</strong> more than 1500 cc <strong>of</strong> pleural fluid per day<br />
• Prolonged collapse (> 72 hours) <strong>of</strong> subsequently reexpanded<br />
lung<br />
• High negative intrapleural pressure<br />
In order to prevent re-expansion edema, we typically withdraw<br />
only one liter <strong>of</strong> fluid when the catheter is placed. We<br />
also stop withdrawing fluid if the patient experiences symptoms<br />
such as cough, chest pain or increasing dyspnea. If there is a<br />
large volume <strong>of</strong> residual fluid (two or three liters), we may<br />
leave the catheter closed for several hours and then open it to<br />
gravity drainage. Suction is applied by Pleur-evac only when<br />
most <strong>of</strong> the fluid has been evacuated by gravity drainage. It<br />
should be recognized, however, that symptomatic re-expansion<br />
edema can occur despite careful attention to detail. These risks,<br />
including the risk <strong>of</strong> death from re-expansion edema, should be<br />
carefully explained to the patient during informed consent.<br />
Ambulatory Drainage:<br />
Selected highly functional patients can be <strong>of</strong>fered ambulatory<br />
drainage. We usually place a smaller catheter in these<br />
patients (10.3 French APDC) and connect it to a Tru-Close 600<br />
cc bag (UreSil, L.P. Skokie, IL 60077) for gravity drainage.<br />
Patients are provided with home care instructions and instructed<br />
to return to clinic for sclerotherapy when drainage falls below<br />
200 cc per day. In clinic, a radiograph is obtained to confirm<br />
complete fluid drainage, absence <strong>of</strong> loculations, and complete<br />
lung re-expansion. Any remaining fluid is aspirated prior to<br />
instillation <strong>of</strong> the sclerosing agent. Following instillation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sclerosing agent, the tube is clamped and the patient is instructed<br />
to change positions frequently. After 2 hours, the tube is<br />
reopened to gravity drainage, the patient is sent home, and is<br />
instructed to return the following day for chest tube removal.<br />
The Pleuryx Catheter (Denver Biomedical, Golden, CO) is a<br />
further option for ambulatory treatment <strong>of</strong> malignant effusions.<br />
This is a tunneled catheter placed into the pleural space using a<br />
trocar, guidewire and a peel-away sheath. The catheter has a<br />
Teflon cuff to prevent bacterial contamination <strong>of</strong> the pleural<br />
space. Fluid is removed periodically (every one-two days)<br />
using small disposable vacuum bottles (1 liter). Preliminary<br />
results suggest that this technique is as efficacious as conventional<br />
inpatient therapy, with few complications, and markedly<br />
reduced cost.<br />
SELECTED REFERENCES<br />
Chang YC, Patz EF Jr, Goodman PC. Pneumothorax after smallbore<br />
catheter placement for malignant pleural effusions. AJR<br />
1996; 166:1049-1051.<br />
Marom EM, Patz EF Jr, Erasmus JJ, et al. Malignant pleural effusions:<br />
treatment with small-bore-catheter thoracostomy and<br />
talc pleurodesis. <strong>Radiology</strong> 1999; 210:277-81.<br />
Marom EM, Erasmus JJ, Herndon JE, Zhang C, McAdams HP.<br />
Usefulness <strong>of</strong> image-guided catheter drainage and talc sclerotherapy<br />
in patients with metastatic gynecologic malignancies<br />
and symptomatic pleural effusions. AJR 2002; 179:105-8.<br />
Morrison MC, Mueller PR, Lee MJ, et al: Sclerotherapy <strong>of</strong> malignant<br />
pleural effusions through sonographically placed smallbore<br />
catheters. AJR 1992; 158:41.<br />
Moulton JS, Moore PT, Mencini RA. Treatment <strong>of</strong> loculated pleural<br />
effusions with transcatheter intracavitary urokinase. AJR 1989;<br />
153:941.<br />
Parulekar W, Di Primio G, Matzinger F, Dennie C, Bociek G. Use<br />
<strong>of</strong> small-bore vs large-bore chest tubes for treatment <strong>of</strong> malignant<br />
pleural effusions. Chest 2001; 120:19-25.<br />
Patz EF Jr, McAdams HP, Goodman PC, et al. Ambulatory sclerotherapy<br />
for malignant pleural effusions. <strong>Radiology</strong> 1996;<br />
199:133-135.<br />
Pollak JS, Burdge CM, Rosenblatt M, Houston JP, Hwu WJ,<br />
Murren J. Treatment <strong>of</strong> malignant pleural effusions with tunneled<br />
long-term drainage catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;<br />
12:201-8.<br />
Putnam JB Jr, Walsh GL, Swisher SG, et al. Outpatient management<br />
<strong>of</strong> malignant pleural effusion by a chronic indwelling<br />
pleural catheter. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 69:369-75.<br />
Putnam JB Jr, Light RW, Rodriguez RM, et al.. A randomized<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> indwelling pleural catheter and doxycycline<br />
pleurodesis in the management <strong>of</strong> malignant pleural effusions.<br />
Cancer 1999; 86:1992-9.<br />
Seaton KG, Patz EF Jr, Goodman PC. Palliative treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
malignant pleural effusions: value <strong>of</strong> small-bore catheter thoracostomy<br />
and doxycycline sclerotherapy. AJR 1995; 164:589-<br />
591.<br />
87<br />
SUNDAY