24.12.2012 Views

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TUESDAY<br />

186<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> Mediastinal Contours<br />

James C. Reed, M.D., F.A.C.R.<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Louisville<br />

Louisville, KY<br />

Objectives:<br />

1. Review normal mediastinal contours to improve perception<br />

<strong>of</strong> mediastinal abnormalities.<br />

2. Distinguish true mediastinal from paramediastinal abnormalities.<br />

3. Review differential diagnosis <strong>of</strong> mediastinal widening and<br />

masses based on alterations <strong>of</strong> mediastinal contours, location<br />

and variations in opacity.<br />

Perception <strong>of</strong> mediastinal abnormalities requires a thorough<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> the many variations in the normal mediastinal contours.<br />

There are numerous mediastinal abnormalities that may be<br />

readily detected and diagnosed by plain film analysis; however,<br />

many abnormalities are suspected from the radiograph and<br />

require multi-planar imaging with CT or MR for confirmation.<br />

Mediastinal contours are visualized as a result <strong>of</strong> the interface <strong>of</strong><br />

the mediastinal pleura with the lung. Abnormalities are perceived<br />

when there are alterations in the normal mediastinal structures.<br />

Additional structures such as an aneursym, masses, or cysts may<br />

displace the pleura while invasive processes such as invasive cancers,<br />

or lymphoma and some infections may cross the mediastinal<br />

pleura eradicating the normal lung-pleura interface.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> mediastinal contours may be facilitated by dividing<br />

the mediastinum into four quadrants and reviewing anatomy<br />

on plain radiographs, CT and MR. The right superior mediastinal<br />

contours are determined by the following: bracheocephalic<br />

veins, superior vena cava, azygous vein, paratracheal line, and<br />

the right main bronchus. The left superior mediastinal contours<br />

include the broncheocephalic vein, subclavian vein and artery,<br />

aortic arch, aorticopulmonary window, main pulmonary artery<br />

and left pulmonary artery. The heart is the largest contour in the<br />

inferior mediastinum, but the inferior vena cava and vertebrae<br />

are identifiable on the right while the vertebrae, descending<br />

aorta and paraspinal stripe should be visualized on the left.<br />

Sagittal MR, the lateral plain film and axial images permit<br />

examination with emphasis on anterior to posterior anatomy.<br />

Anteriorly, we may identify abnormalities <strong>of</strong> the thymus, lymph<br />

nodes, fat, and right heart. The middle structures include the<br />

trachea, esophagus, superior vena cava, aorta, great vessels, and<br />

lymph nodes. Posteriorly, we observe the descending aorta and<br />

the spine.<br />

Mediastinal lipomatosis is a common variant <strong>of</strong> normal seen<br />

in obese patients. It is also seen in patients with endocrine disturbances<br />

such as Cushing’s disease or those on high dose<br />

steroid therapy. The opacity <strong>of</strong> fat is between that <strong>of</strong> the mediastinal<br />

s<strong>of</strong>t tissues and the aerated lung. This is sometimes recognized<br />

on plain film, but usually requires CT for confirmation.<br />

Since a number <strong>of</strong> mediastinal contours are the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

interface <strong>of</strong> vascular structures with the lung, there are important<br />

differences in mediastinal contours based on the patient’s<br />

age. This is especially true <strong>of</strong> the contours <strong>of</strong> the heart and great<br />

vessels, especially the aorta and superior vena cava. Enlarged<br />

vessels and vascular abnormalities must always be distinguished<br />

from mediastinal masses especially before consideration <strong>of</strong><br />

biopsy.<br />

Pulmonary consolidations should be distinguishable from<br />

mediastinal abnormalities by the presence <strong>of</strong> ill-defined or irregular<br />

borders and the presence <strong>of</strong> air-bronchograms or even<br />

lucent spaces. Lung masses are <strong>of</strong>ten irregular and sometimes<br />

heterogeneous, but may be smooth and when closely applied to<br />

the mediastinal pleura could be difficult to distinguish from a<br />

mediastinal mass. Lung masses which are firm and round may<br />

form a characteristic sulcus with the mediastinal pleura This<br />

appearance is <strong>of</strong>ten distinctive from the expected tapered interface<br />

that is seen when a mediastinal mass displaces the pleura<br />

into the lung. Primary lung cancers may be even more difficult<br />

to evaluate because they are locally invasive and may extend<br />

directly into the mediastinum or they may metastasize to the<br />

mediastinal nodes. In contrast with invasive primary lung tumors,<br />

mediastinal lymphomas arise in the mediastinal nodes or thymus<br />

and may also be locally invasive and spread into the lung. Serial<br />

films may document the progression <strong>of</strong> the tumor and provide<br />

reliable signs for distinguishing lung tumors from lymphoma, but<br />

this <strong>of</strong>ten requires biopsy when patients present with advanced<br />

disease. Infrequently, other mediastinal tumors in particular<br />

malignant thymoma may be locally invasive and mimic the<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> lymphoma or extensive metastatic disease.<br />

Chest wall abnormalities may arise anteriorly from the sternum<br />

or from posterior ribs and may suggest a mediastinal<br />

abnormality on the plain film. They may be accurately identified<br />

by the presence <strong>of</strong> bone destruction or by multiplanar<br />

images that show extension <strong>of</strong> the abnormality into the chest<br />

wall. Pleural abnormalities that arise from the medial pleura<br />

may be more difficult to correctly localize and are <strong>of</strong>ten indistinguishable<br />

from primary mediastinal abnormalities by plain<br />

film and <strong>of</strong>ten require CT for correct diagnosis..<br />

Masses are challenging to evaluate, but processes that<br />

spread diffusely through the mediastinum produce an even less<br />

distinctive radiographic appearance <strong>of</strong> diffuse mediastinal<br />

widening. Mediastinal widening may result from hematoma,<br />

vascular abnormalities, invasive masses, infection, fibrosis,<br />

accumulations <strong>of</strong> fat and abnormalities <strong>of</strong> the esophagus.<br />

While the expected appearance <strong>of</strong> adenopathy may be that <strong>of</strong><br />

circumscribed masses, very extensive adenopathy from both<br />

infectious and neoplastic causes may diffusely widen the mediastinum.<br />

Clinical correlation is essential, for example, patients<br />

with AIDS who develop mediastinal adenopathy <strong>of</strong>ten have very<br />

extensive adenopathy involving multiple node groups. This<br />

requires consideration <strong>of</strong> infections by mycobacteria, or fungi,<br />

and may also result from Kaposi=s sarcoma or lymphoma.<br />

While reactive lymph node hyperplasia may cause progressive<br />

generalized adenopathy this is not a frequent cause <strong>of</strong> nodes that<br />

are detectable by plain film and rarely causes adenopathy with<br />

nodes greater than 1cm on CT.<br />

Careful analysis <strong>of</strong> mediastinal contours is required to distinguish<br />

primary mediastinal from pleural, pulmonary and chest<br />

wall abnormalities. Most mediastinal abnormalites are detected<br />

with plain films, and in some cases the correct diagnosis may be<br />

suspected, but most require CT, MR or biopsy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!