Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology
Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology
Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
TUESDAY<br />
186<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> Mediastinal Contours<br />
James C. Reed, M.D., F.A.C.R.<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Louisville<br />
Louisville, KY<br />
Objectives:<br />
1. Review normal mediastinal contours to improve perception<br />
<strong>of</strong> mediastinal abnormalities.<br />
2. Distinguish true mediastinal from paramediastinal abnormalities.<br />
3. Review differential diagnosis <strong>of</strong> mediastinal widening and<br />
masses based on alterations <strong>of</strong> mediastinal contours, location<br />
and variations in opacity.<br />
Perception <strong>of</strong> mediastinal abnormalities requires a thorough<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong> the many variations in the normal mediastinal contours.<br />
There are numerous mediastinal abnormalities that may be<br />
readily detected and diagnosed by plain film analysis; however,<br />
many abnormalities are suspected from the radiograph and<br />
require multi-planar imaging with CT or MR for confirmation.<br />
Mediastinal contours are visualized as a result <strong>of</strong> the interface <strong>of</strong><br />
the mediastinal pleura with the lung. Abnormalities are perceived<br />
when there are alterations in the normal mediastinal structures.<br />
Additional structures such as an aneursym, masses, or cysts may<br />
displace the pleura while invasive processes such as invasive cancers,<br />
or lymphoma and some infections may cross the mediastinal<br />
pleura eradicating the normal lung-pleura interface.<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> mediastinal contours may be facilitated by dividing<br />
the mediastinum into four quadrants and reviewing anatomy<br />
on plain radiographs, CT and MR. The right superior mediastinal<br />
contours are determined by the following: bracheocephalic<br />
veins, superior vena cava, azygous vein, paratracheal line, and<br />
the right main bronchus. The left superior mediastinal contours<br />
include the broncheocephalic vein, subclavian vein and artery,<br />
aortic arch, aorticopulmonary window, main pulmonary artery<br />
and left pulmonary artery. The heart is the largest contour in the<br />
inferior mediastinum, but the inferior vena cava and vertebrae<br />
are identifiable on the right while the vertebrae, descending<br />
aorta and paraspinal stripe should be visualized on the left.<br />
Sagittal MR, the lateral plain film and axial images permit<br />
examination with emphasis on anterior to posterior anatomy.<br />
Anteriorly, we may identify abnormalities <strong>of</strong> the thymus, lymph<br />
nodes, fat, and right heart. The middle structures include the<br />
trachea, esophagus, superior vena cava, aorta, great vessels, and<br />
lymph nodes. Posteriorly, we observe the descending aorta and<br />
the spine.<br />
Mediastinal lipomatosis is a common variant <strong>of</strong> normal seen<br />
in obese patients. It is also seen in patients with endocrine disturbances<br />
such as Cushing’s disease or those on high dose<br />
steroid therapy. The opacity <strong>of</strong> fat is between that <strong>of</strong> the mediastinal<br />
s<strong>of</strong>t tissues and the aerated lung. This is sometimes recognized<br />
on plain film, but usually requires CT for confirmation.<br />
Since a number <strong>of</strong> mediastinal contours are the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />
interface <strong>of</strong> vascular structures with the lung, there are important<br />
differences in mediastinal contours based on the patient’s<br />
age. This is especially true <strong>of</strong> the contours <strong>of</strong> the heart and great<br />
vessels, especially the aorta and superior vena cava. Enlarged<br />
vessels and vascular abnormalities must always be distinguished<br />
from mediastinal masses especially before consideration <strong>of</strong><br />
biopsy.<br />
Pulmonary consolidations should be distinguishable from<br />
mediastinal abnormalities by the presence <strong>of</strong> ill-defined or irregular<br />
borders and the presence <strong>of</strong> air-bronchograms or even<br />
lucent spaces. Lung masses are <strong>of</strong>ten irregular and sometimes<br />
heterogeneous, but may be smooth and when closely applied to<br />
the mediastinal pleura could be difficult to distinguish from a<br />
mediastinal mass. Lung masses which are firm and round may<br />
form a characteristic sulcus with the mediastinal pleura This<br />
appearance is <strong>of</strong>ten distinctive from the expected tapered interface<br />
that is seen when a mediastinal mass displaces the pleura<br />
into the lung. Primary lung cancers may be even more difficult<br />
to evaluate because they are locally invasive and may extend<br />
directly into the mediastinum or they may metastasize to the<br />
mediastinal nodes. In contrast with invasive primary lung tumors,<br />
mediastinal lymphomas arise in the mediastinal nodes or thymus<br />
and may also be locally invasive and spread into the lung. Serial<br />
films may document the progression <strong>of</strong> the tumor and provide<br />
reliable signs for distinguishing lung tumors from lymphoma, but<br />
this <strong>of</strong>ten requires biopsy when patients present with advanced<br />
disease. Infrequently, other mediastinal tumors in particular<br />
malignant thymoma may be locally invasive and mimic the<br />
appearance <strong>of</strong> lymphoma or extensive metastatic disease.<br />
Chest wall abnormalities may arise anteriorly from the sternum<br />
or from posterior ribs and may suggest a mediastinal<br />
abnormality on the plain film. They may be accurately identified<br />
by the presence <strong>of</strong> bone destruction or by multiplanar<br />
images that show extension <strong>of</strong> the abnormality into the chest<br />
wall. Pleural abnormalities that arise from the medial pleura<br />
may be more difficult to correctly localize and are <strong>of</strong>ten indistinguishable<br />
from primary mediastinal abnormalities by plain<br />
film and <strong>of</strong>ten require CT for correct diagnosis..<br />
Masses are challenging to evaluate, but processes that<br />
spread diffusely through the mediastinum produce an even less<br />
distinctive radiographic appearance <strong>of</strong> diffuse mediastinal<br />
widening. Mediastinal widening may result from hematoma,<br />
vascular abnormalities, invasive masses, infection, fibrosis,<br />
accumulations <strong>of</strong> fat and abnormalities <strong>of</strong> the esophagus.<br />
While the expected appearance <strong>of</strong> adenopathy may be that <strong>of</strong><br />
circumscribed masses, very extensive adenopathy from both<br />
infectious and neoplastic causes may diffusely widen the mediastinum.<br />
Clinical correlation is essential, for example, patients<br />
with AIDS who develop mediastinal adenopathy <strong>of</strong>ten have very<br />
extensive adenopathy involving multiple node groups. This<br />
requires consideration <strong>of</strong> infections by mycobacteria, or fungi,<br />
and may also result from Kaposi=s sarcoma or lymphoma.<br />
While reactive lymph node hyperplasia may cause progressive<br />
generalized adenopathy this is not a frequent cause <strong>of</strong> nodes that<br />
are detectable by plain film and rarely causes adenopathy with<br />
nodes greater than 1cm on CT.<br />
Careful analysis <strong>of</strong> mediastinal contours is required to distinguish<br />
primary mediastinal from pleural, pulmonary and chest<br />
wall abnormalities. Most mediastinal abnormalites are detected<br />
with plain films, and in some cases the correct diagnosis may be<br />
suspected, but most require CT, MR or biopsy.