09.10.2021 Views

Historic Trauma and Aboriginal Healing

by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.

by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2<br />

relations. Acts of encroachment, caused by missionaries, settlers or governments, destroyed the central<br />

meaning of culture <strong>and</strong> its entire social structure. People deprived of their cultural traditions have no<br />

meaning in lives that become reduced to a mere physiological routine. With the loss of moral values<br />

<strong>and</strong> a sense of heritage, social deterioration inevitably follows.<br />

The colonizers came to North America with their voracious appetite for new l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> economic<br />

resources. When they met with <strong>Aboriginal</strong> cultures, they quickly realized that, in order to achieve their<br />

ambitious economic goals, they had to apply fixed, dual categories to the inhabitants of the New World.<br />

If the newcomers were “we,” then <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people had to become “they” or “other” in order for the<br />

colonizers to steal what they wanted, simply because one does not steal from oneself. The invaders did<br />

not see order in the <strong>Aboriginal</strong> social organization because without familiar structures (British or French<br />

laws), a known code (Christian morality), a text (Bible), they were lost. The invaders clung to the belief<br />

they brought with them. If their conceptual constructions, such as an organized economy, evolution<br />

<strong>and</strong> development, were fruitful in achieving desired economic ends in this new place, their <strong>Aboriginal</strong><br />

opposites (with an emphasis on maintaining balance, different belief systems, oral traditions, reciprocity<br />

<strong>and</strong> redistribution) must have been detrimental, primitive <strong>and</strong>, therefore, would lead to stagnation. For<br />

growth (in the European underst<strong>and</strong>ing) to be achieved, the colonizers would have to impose their<br />

conceptual constructions on colonized societies to order the perceived chaos.<br />

European desire to comm<strong>and</strong> what they saw as chaos was exercised by a method of enframing<br />

(categorizing) or breaking up the existing Indigenous order of spiritual relatedness <strong>and</strong> substituting it<br />

with an order of known signs <strong>and</strong> representations (or what became new laws, new religion, new morality)<br />

<strong>and</strong> containing it into dual categories (ours <strong>and</strong> theirs). Abstract notions, such as authority, law <strong>and</strong><br />

order, were brought to life within the conceptual realm <strong>and</strong> proclaimed as “objectively existing.” Apparent<br />

objective existence of these notions was evident only through their representations: organized army,<br />

obedient citizens, churches full of practitioners <strong>and</strong> carefully arranged economic structures. Once the<br />

existing <strong>Aboriginal</strong> social <strong>and</strong> cultural structures were rearranged <strong>and</strong> organized according to the new<br />

laws brought by the colonizers <strong>and</strong> once the other Indigenous culture was separated from its reality <strong>and</strong><br />

incorporated into an abstract meta-reality of new European signs <strong>and</strong> representations, the process of<br />

colonization was complete <strong>and</strong> North America fully discovered, regardless of the fact that Dehatkadons,<br />

a traditional chief of the Onondaga, said to Ronald Wright: “You cannot discover an inhabited l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Otherwise I could cross the Atlantic <strong>and</strong> discover “Engl<strong>and</strong>”” (cited in Wright, 1992:5).<br />

Thus, through contact with the missionaries <strong>and</strong> settlers, <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people were introduced not only<br />

to new beliefs, but also to a dramatically different canon of acceptable social behaviour. In any stable<br />

society, social actions that people perform follow directly from the norms. The social norms prescribe<br />

what is to be done in any given situation <strong>and</strong> action follows almost automatically. This kind of automatic,<br />

agreed upon action is vital to social integration <strong>and</strong> to the integration of the social personality. If people<br />

pause to consider the meaning of every act, their ability to make decisions would be seriously hampered;<br />

they would get frustrated, confused <strong>and</strong>, eventually, would be unable to act at all. Social norms develop<br />

from moral values. The latter develop from people’s experiences, from the teachings of religions <strong>and</strong><br />

from socially accepted ethical principles. Before first contact, Indigenous societies had their own culturally<br />

prescribed norms of proper <strong>and</strong> acceptable social conduct. These norms developed from years of shared<br />

experiences, from contact with nature seen as a spiritual domain <strong>and</strong> from what worked in their societies.<br />

<strong>Aboriginal</strong> people’s morality before contact placed more value on ensuring that relationships between<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!