09.10.2021 Views

Historic Trauma and Aboriginal Healing

by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.

by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2<br />

Analyzing the <strong>Trauma</strong><br />

In the Americas <strong>and</strong> Oceania, by contrast contact-induced disease was as much a prelude<br />

to European domination as its aftermath. Here domination was facilitated, <strong>and</strong> even<br />

made possible, by the devastating p<strong>and</strong>emics that decimated <strong>and</strong> demoralized whole<br />

populations (Kunitz, 1994:3).<br />

Early Period: Cultural Transition - Physical Area of Impact<br />

The timing of initial contact with the colonizers, who slowly <strong>and</strong> methodically overwhelmed <strong>and</strong><br />

destroyed Indigenous societies, varied among the North American <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people. For the societies<br />

in the east, first contact may be dated around 1500. The <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people of Alaska met the settlers<br />

for the first time in 1740. According to Ubelaker (1988), the estimated population size of North<br />

American <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people in 1500 was 1,894,280, with a possible range from 1,213,475 to 2,638,900.<br />

Every hundred years that followed saw a rapid decline in the <strong>Aboriginal</strong> population: 1,801,080 in<br />

1600; 1,404,745 in 1700; 1,051,688 in 1800; 770,981 in 1850; <strong>and</strong> the lowest population size in 1900<br />

was 536,562. These figures represent a decline by over 1,364,00 persons or 72 per cent (Ubelaker,<br />

1988). The magnitude of this demographic collapse has been debated <strong>and</strong> some researchers even<br />

believe that the population decline across the Americas was over 90 per cent. Severe decline in the<br />

population size has been attributed to outbreaks of introduced infectious diseases, such as smallpox,<br />

measles <strong>and</strong> influenza, to which the <strong>Aboriginal</strong> population did not have immunity. In general, foodforaging<br />

populations throughout history had relatively low rates of infectious diseases due to their small<br />

population size <strong>and</strong> mobility (Dunn, 1968). Diseases that require larger contagious populations in<br />

order to be transmitted were probably non-existent until the introduction of agriculture <strong>and</strong> pre-industrial<br />

cities. These infectious diseases that first evolved in animal hosts domesticated in Europe, were not<br />

present in the western hemisphere <strong>and</strong> were brought to the Americas by the colonizers.<br />

Since the entire Indigenous population was exposed to these diseases <strong>and</strong> the majority of the exposed<br />

contracted the diseases, no one was left to care for the sick <strong>and</strong> no one to provide food or water. Often,<br />

several different infections were introduced at once or in quick succession. Traditional treatments did<br />

not work <strong>and</strong> there was no notion of quarantine. <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people did not know what caused the<br />

epidemics <strong>and</strong> could not find an effective cure. One researcher compared European contact with<br />

<strong>Aboriginal</strong> societies to a “biological war:”<br />

Smallpox was the captain of the men of death in that war, typhus fever the first lieutenant,<br />

<strong>and</strong> measles the second lieutenant. More terrible than the conquistadors on horseback,<br />

more deadly than sword <strong>and</strong> gunpowder, they made the conquest by the whites a walkover<br />

as compared with what it would have been without their aid. They were the forerunners<br />

of civilization, the companions of Christianity, the friends of the invader (Ashburn,<br />

1947:98 as cited in Joralemon, 1982:112).<br />

The <strong>Aboriginal</strong> societies who had the earliest <strong>and</strong> most frequent contact with Europeans were affected<br />

earlier <strong>and</strong> more severely than those populations who had later or little interaction with disease-carrying<br />

Europeans. According to Dobyns (1983), an outbreak was recorded as early as 1619, among coastal<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!