Historic Trauma and Aboriginal Healing
by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.
by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 1<br />
In areas that now constitute the United States, records of death <strong>and</strong> depopulation were equally grim.<br />
Journal entries by French colonists living on the St. Lawrence River are worth noting since they appeared<br />
to have kept accurate records on the affairs of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people. “Between 1634 <strong>and</strong> 1640, a series of<br />
epidemics broke out, with smallpox being a principle component” (Cook, 1998:194). “By 1640 there<br />
were only 10,000 Huron left out of an estimated 20,000 to 35,000 in the early 1600s … The Iroquois<br />
themselves suffered a similar fate two decades later” (1998:195-196). Taking into consideration the<br />
number of cases <strong>and</strong> estimates of death since the introduction of smallpox to North America, it would<br />
not be unreasonable to consider a seventy per cent or higher overall mortality rate.<br />
Cook (1973) argues that medical implications of European-Indigenous contact fall into two categories.<br />
The first category consists of the well-known epidemics of 1518 to 1519, 1617 to 1619 <strong>and</strong> of 1633,<br />
which killed close to one hundred per cent of the Indigenous people in specific areas of the continent.<br />
The second category consisted of chronic disease <strong>and</strong> its long-term effects on the Indigenous population,<br />
which steadily contributed to weakening Indigenous health. Habitual food scarcity <strong>and</strong> chronic illnesses,<br />
including tuberculosis, pneumonia, dysentery <strong>and</strong> venereal disease, continued to undermine the surviving<br />
population. Long-term chronic illnesses produced physical disturbances (such as displacement) that, in<br />
turn, were exacerbated by the effects of civil disorder, beginning with the first century of non-<strong>Aboriginal</strong><br />
occupation. These endemic maladies, coupled with warfare <strong>and</strong> social instability, further undermined<br />
an already struggling Indigenous population <strong>and</strong> sapped moral <strong>and</strong> spiritual resistance. Cook (1973)<br />
accepts a relatively low estimate of the American Indian population in New Engl<strong>and</strong>, although his<br />
conclusions about rates of mortality among these people alone, as late as the seventeenth century,<br />
remain shocking no matter what the original population base might have been. In his estimation, the<br />
fact that there are any Native descendants alive today loudly declares the stamina of Indian endurance<br />
<strong>and</strong> highlights a will to live in the face of huge <strong>and</strong> opposing odds.<br />
In 1717, the Governor of New York held a conference at Albany, with representatives of the Five<br />
Nations of the Iroquois. In his address, he expressed sympathy to the Iroquois for their loss of friends<br />
<strong>and</strong> family due to smallpox. He then pointed out that, as Christians, they believe being inflicted with<br />
a disease is considered punishment for their “misdeeds <strong>and</strong> sins” (Leder, 1956). This message was not<br />
well received by the Five Nations people who were well aware of the source of the disease. By the late<br />
1700s, the Indians were all too aware of what the source of the disease was <strong>and</strong> were not impressed with<br />
the explanation. In reply to the threat of further illness, they responded: “they intended to dispatch<br />
someone to Canistoge, Virginy, or Maryl<strong>and</strong> to find out who had been sending the contagion <strong>and</strong> to<br />
prevent them from doing so” (Duffy, 1951:334).<br />
Death by disease was not the only problem the <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people were facing. Their numbers were also<br />
being extirpated by increasing warfare. In the battle among the Europeans, new Americans <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Indigenous people, there is little doubt who came out the losers. As the United States Bureau of Census<br />
asserted in 1984:<br />
[I]t has been estimated that since 1775 more than 5,000 white men, women, <strong>and</strong> children<br />
have been killed in individual affairs with Indians, <strong>and</strong> more than 8,500 Indians. History,<br />
in general, notes but few of these combats. The Indian wars under the Government of<br />
the United States have been more than 40 in number. They have cost the lives of<br />
19,000 white men, women, <strong>and</strong> children, including those killed in individual combats,<br />
20