09.10.2021 Views

Historic Trauma and Aboriginal Healing

by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.

by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1<br />

In areas that now constitute the United States, records of death <strong>and</strong> depopulation were equally grim.<br />

Journal entries by French colonists living on the St. Lawrence River are worth noting since they appeared<br />

to have kept accurate records on the affairs of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people. “Between 1634 <strong>and</strong> 1640, a series of<br />

epidemics broke out, with smallpox being a principle component” (Cook, 1998:194). “By 1640 there<br />

were only 10,000 Huron left out of an estimated 20,000 to 35,000 in the early 1600s … The Iroquois<br />

themselves suffered a similar fate two decades later” (1998:195-196). Taking into consideration the<br />

number of cases <strong>and</strong> estimates of death since the introduction of smallpox to North America, it would<br />

not be unreasonable to consider a seventy per cent or higher overall mortality rate.<br />

Cook (1973) argues that medical implications of European-Indigenous contact fall into two categories.<br />

The first category consists of the well-known epidemics of 1518 to 1519, 1617 to 1619 <strong>and</strong> of 1633,<br />

which killed close to one hundred per cent of the Indigenous people in specific areas of the continent.<br />

The second category consisted of chronic disease <strong>and</strong> its long-term effects on the Indigenous population,<br />

which steadily contributed to weakening Indigenous health. Habitual food scarcity <strong>and</strong> chronic illnesses,<br />

including tuberculosis, pneumonia, dysentery <strong>and</strong> venereal disease, continued to undermine the surviving<br />

population. Long-term chronic illnesses produced physical disturbances (such as displacement) that, in<br />

turn, were exacerbated by the effects of civil disorder, beginning with the first century of non-<strong>Aboriginal</strong><br />

occupation. These endemic maladies, coupled with warfare <strong>and</strong> social instability, further undermined<br />

an already struggling Indigenous population <strong>and</strong> sapped moral <strong>and</strong> spiritual resistance. Cook (1973)<br />

accepts a relatively low estimate of the American Indian population in New Engl<strong>and</strong>, although his<br />

conclusions about rates of mortality among these people alone, as late as the seventeenth century,<br />

remain shocking no matter what the original population base might have been. In his estimation, the<br />

fact that there are any Native descendants alive today loudly declares the stamina of Indian endurance<br />

<strong>and</strong> highlights a will to live in the face of huge <strong>and</strong> opposing odds.<br />

In 1717, the Governor of New York held a conference at Albany, with representatives of the Five<br />

Nations of the Iroquois. In his address, he expressed sympathy to the Iroquois for their loss of friends<br />

<strong>and</strong> family due to smallpox. He then pointed out that, as Christians, they believe being inflicted with<br />

a disease is considered punishment for their “misdeeds <strong>and</strong> sins” (Leder, 1956). This message was not<br />

well received by the Five Nations people who were well aware of the source of the disease. By the late<br />

1700s, the Indians were all too aware of what the source of the disease was <strong>and</strong> were not impressed with<br />

the explanation. In reply to the threat of further illness, they responded: “they intended to dispatch<br />

someone to Canistoge, Virginy, or Maryl<strong>and</strong> to find out who had been sending the contagion <strong>and</strong> to<br />

prevent them from doing so” (Duffy, 1951:334).<br />

Death by disease was not the only problem the <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people were facing. Their numbers were also<br />

being extirpated by increasing warfare. In the battle among the Europeans, new Americans <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Indigenous people, there is little doubt who came out the losers. As the United States Bureau of Census<br />

asserted in 1984:<br />

[I]t has been estimated that since 1775 more than 5,000 white men, women, <strong>and</strong> children<br />

have been killed in individual affairs with Indians, <strong>and</strong> more than 8,500 Indians. History,<br />

in general, notes but few of these combats. The Indian wars under the Government of<br />

the United States have been more than 40 in number. They have cost the lives of<br />

19,000 white men, women, <strong>and</strong> children, including those killed in individual combats,<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!