Historic Trauma and Aboriginal Healing
by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.
by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Introduction<br />
Once the physical make-up of the colonized society was changed through the devastating effects of<br />
infectious diseases <strong>and</strong> restricted access to economic resources (cultural transition), both cultural <strong>and</strong><br />
social structures became vulnerable to changes, modifications <strong>and</strong>, ultimately, deterioration <strong>and</strong><br />
disintegration (cultural dispossession). Consequently, the destruction of cultural autonomy, social<br />
integrity <strong>and</strong> cultural identity, as well as hundreds of years of relentless cultural oppression caused<br />
profound changes in the psychological make-up of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people, discontinuities on interpersonal<br />
<strong>and</strong> communal levels, social <strong>and</strong> interpersonal conflicts, psychological dissociation on cultural levels,<br />
<strong>and</strong> mental anguish on individual levels (cultural oppression).<br />
It is further proposed that what was done to Indigenous people in the Americas had all the characteristics<br />
of genocide <strong>and</strong>, as such, evoked similar responses to trauma that researchers observe not only in people<br />
who survived genocide, but also in their children <strong>and</strong> gr<strong>and</strong>children. To provide evidence for the theory<br />
of trauma response <strong>and</strong> transmission <strong>and</strong> to confirm the similarities, the issue of genocide is discussed.<br />
A variety of stories about Australian <strong>Aboriginal</strong> societies, detailed psychological research that deals with<br />
genocide victims’ reactions to their terrible experiences, as well as current studies on post-traumatic<br />
stress disorder are presented. The myriad effects of historic trauma, known as a “complex or cultural<br />
post-traumatic stress disorder” have become deeply embedded in the worldview <strong>and</strong> collective<br />
consciousness of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people, together with a sense of learned helplessness. A cognitive social<br />
theory of learned helplessness <strong>and</strong> of internal versus external locus of control are also discussed in the<br />
broader context of social identity formation <strong>and</strong> cultural reactions to historic <strong>and</strong> social forces continuously<br />
influencing inter <strong>and</strong> intra group relations in an <strong>Aboriginal</strong> context.<br />
Next, based on comprehensive research that brings together information from a variety of disciplines,<br />
including history, anthropology, psychology, psychiatry, sociology <strong>and</strong> political science, the proposed<br />
model of historic trauma transmission (HTT) <strong>and</strong> discussion on possible implications it may have on<br />
<strong>Aboriginal</strong> communities in Canada, the general public <strong>and</strong> government institutions are presented. The<br />
study concludes with a few words from <strong>Aboriginal</strong> Elders whose experiences, narratives, wisdom <strong>and</strong><br />
access to other spiritual planes <strong>and</strong> visions are the ultimate testimony of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people’s resilience<br />
<strong>and</strong> strength in their continuous battle for survival.<br />
The argument is given that historic factors strongly influenced <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people’s locus of personal<br />
<strong>and</strong> social control, engendered a sense of fatalism <strong>and</strong> reactivity to historical <strong>and</strong> social forces, <strong>and</strong><br />
adversely influenced their social relations. In the eyes of the non-<strong>Aboriginal</strong> population, <strong>Aboriginal</strong><br />
people became silent, powerless constructions of “otherness,” which is a representation bounded but<br />
never relational. These complex processes, located between the inscriptions of marginality imposed on<br />
<strong>Aboriginal</strong> people by the dominant culture <strong>and</strong> <strong>Aboriginal</strong> integrity translated into cultural propositions,<br />
were never fully understood by <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people or non-<strong>Aboriginal</strong> societies.<br />
This study brings to light the social consequences of the brutal colonization of the Americas that are<br />
trivialized by many politicians in their official discourse of power, which maintains the marginality of<br />
<strong>Aboriginal</strong> people <strong>and</strong> perpetuates the particularization of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people’s terrible experiences. Most<br />
<strong>Aboriginal</strong> people <strong>and</strong> most researchers who work with them agree that the “present” <strong>Aboriginal</strong><br />
communities are a direct legacy of their traumatic “past.” It appears that the “way” people remember<br />
7