Historic Trauma and Aboriginal Healing
by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.
by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Introduction<br />
of war <strong>and</strong> disease lost hope <strong>and</strong> social disintegration followed. This “disease factor” differentiates the<br />
history of colonization of the Americas from other regions of the world. It explains why Europeans<br />
were successful in destroying civilization after civilization in the New World. As Wright proposes:<br />
Europe possessed biological weapons that fate had been stacking against America for<br />
thous<strong>and</strong>s of years. Among these were smallpox, measles, influenza, bubonic plague,<br />
yellow fever, cholera, <strong>and</strong> malaria - all unknown in the Western Hemisphere before<br />
1492 (1992:13-14).<br />
<strong>Aboriginal</strong> people were separated from their l<strong>and</strong>, which was always sentient to them <strong>and</strong> affected<br />
people’s lives <strong>and</strong> their social constitution through time. The introduction of non-traditional coping<br />
mechanisms damaged families, altered gender roles <strong>and</strong> diminished cultural values. Indigenous people,<br />
before contact, lived in a complex socio-economic system that required co-operation to maximize the<br />
productivity of the l<strong>and</strong>scape. After contact, Indigenous people were disfavoured in access to resources<br />
<strong>and</strong> social opportunities <strong>and</strong> killed by diseases. Colonial powers introduced sharp status distinctions,<br />
imposed strict rules for governing conduct, controlled the system of social rewards <strong>and</strong> punishments,<br />
<strong>and</strong> manipulated power <strong>and</strong> status symbols. These alterations are generally discussed in reference to<br />
past events, but it can be readily argued that the impacts have contemporary <strong>and</strong> generational application<br />
<strong>and</strong> effect. According to many, colonialism belongs largely to the historical past <strong>and</strong> was replaced by<br />
inequality <strong>and</strong> domination in other forms. This study is based on a proposition that the historical<br />
experiences of First Nation people, which disrupted the process of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> cultural identity formation,<br />
continue to resonate in the present <strong>and</strong> that the harm done in the past continues to manifest<br />
intergenerationally into the present.<br />
The Scope of the Study<br />
This study investigates the issue of generationally transmitted <strong>and</strong> universal historic trauma to which<br />
Indigenous people of the Americas were exposed during centuries of colonization. Intolerable, unresolved<br />
<strong>and</strong> cumulative stress <strong>and</strong> grief experienced by communities <strong>and</strong> nations became translated, in time,<br />
into a collective experience of cultural disruption <strong>and</strong> a collective memory of powerlessness <strong>and</strong> loss. In<br />
turn, this was passed on to successive generations as a collective contagion, manifesting itself in a variety<br />
of social problems that <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people across the continent continue to experience today. To<br />
substantiate this thesis, an historical background is presented, drawing on examples from Indigenous<br />
cultures that came in contact with forces of colonization <strong>and</strong> assimilation. These examples, which<br />
include Indigenous nations of South <strong>and</strong> Central Americas, help explain how First Nation people were<br />
traumatized in a global context <strong>and</strong> that this global context of trauma <strong>and</strong> suffering produces similar<br />
psychological <strong>and</strong> social reactions in trauma victims, regardless of their cultural background or direct<br />
experience with the original source of the trauma.<br />
In his analysis of the Buffalo Creek disaster in southern West Virginia of the United States, which was<br />
a devastating flood, Erikson (1976) spoke of two traumas: first, the occurrence of the event itself; <strong>and</strong><br />
second, the destruction of community life <strong>and</strong> the loss of social contacts. It has been repeatedly<br />
demonstrated, in the case of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people, that traumatic impact was widespread <strong>and</strong> profound,<br />
<strong>and</strong> involved a shattering of family <strong>and</strong> community life. Alan Young (1995) argues the particularity of<br />
5