09.10.2021 Views

Historic Trauma and Aboriginal Healing

by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.

by Cynthia C. Wesley-Esquimaux, Ph.D. and Magdalena Smolewski, Ph.D.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

of war <strong>and</strong> disease lost hope <strong>and</strong> social disintegration followed. This “disease factor” differentiates the<br />

history of colonization of the Americas from other regions of the world. It explains why Europeans<br />

were successful in destroying civilization after civilization in the New World. As Wright proposes:<br />

Europe possessed biological weapons that fate had been stacking against America for<br />

thous<strong>and</strong>s of years. Among these were smallpox, measles, influenza, bubonic plague,<br />

yellow fever, cholera, <strong>and</strong> malaria - all unknown in the Western Hemisphere before<br />

1492 (1992:13-14).<br />

<strong>Aboriginal</strong> people were separated from their l<strong>and</strong>, which was always sentient to them <strong>and</strong> affected<br />

people’s lives <strong>and</strong> their social constitution through time. The introduction of non-traditional coping<br />

mechanisms damaged families, altered gender roles <strong>and</strong> diminished cultural values. Indigenous people,<br />

before contact, lived in a complex socio-economic system that required co-operation to maximize the<br />

productivity of the l<strong>and</strong>scape. After contact, Indigenous people were disfavoured in access to resources<br />

<strong>and</strong> social opportunities <strong>and</strong> killed by diseases. Colonial powers introduced sharp status distinctions,<br />

imposed strict rules for governing conduct, controlled the system of social rewards <strong>and</strong> punishments,<br />

<strong>and</strong> manipulated power <strong>and</strong> status symbols. These alterations are generally discussed in reference to<br />

past events, but it can be readily argued that the impacts have contemporary <strong>and</strong> generational application<br />

<strong>and</strong> effect. According to many, colonialism belongs largely to the historical past <strong>and</strong> was replaced by<br />

inequality <strong>and</strong> domination in other forms. This study is based on a proposition that the historical<br />

experiences of First Nation people, which disrupted the process of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> cultural identity formation,<br />

continue to resonate in the present <strong>and</strong> that the harm done in the past continues to manifest<br />

intergenerationally into the present.<br />

The Scope of the Study<br />

This study investigates the issue of generationally transmitted <strong>and</strong> universal historic trauma to which<br />

Indigenous people of the Americas were exposed during centuries of colonization. Intolerable, unresolved<br />

<strong>and</strong> cumulative stress <strong>and</strong> grief experienced by communities <strong>and</strong> nations became translated, in time,<br />

into a collective experience of cultural disruption <strong>and</strong> a collective memory of powerlessness <strong>and</strong> loss. In<br />

turn, this was passed on to successive generations as a collective contagion, manifesting itself in a variety<br />

of social problems that <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people across the continent continue to experience today. To<br />

substantiate this thesis, an historical background is presented, drawing on examples from Indigenous<br />

cultures that came in contact with forces of colonization <strong>and</strong> assimilation. These examples, which<br />

include Indigenous nations of South <strong>and</strong> Central Americas, help explain how First Nation people were<br />

traumatized in a global context <strong>and</strong> that this global context of trauma <strong>and</strong> suffering produces similar<br />

psychological <strong>and</strong> social reactions in trauma victims, regardless of their cultural background or direct<br />

experience with the original source of the trauma.<br />

In his analysis of the Buffalo Creek disaster in southern West Virginia of the United States, which was<br />

a devastating flood, Erikson (1976) spoke of two traumas: first, the occurrence of the event itself; <strong>and</strong><br />

second, the destruction of community life <strong>and</strong> the loss of social contacts. It has been repeatedly<br />

demonstrated, in the case of <strong>Aboriginal</strong> people, that traumatic impact was widespread <strong>and</strong> profound,<br />

<strong>and</strong> involved a shattering of family <strong>and</strong> community life. Alan Young (1995) argues the particularity of<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!