Newslink October 2021
Membership magazine of the Motor Schools Association; road safety, driver training and testing news.
Membership magazine of the Motor Schools Association; road safety, driver training and testing news.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
News<br />
TRAILER<br />
TRAINERS<br />
TRASHED<br />
The past month has seen a furious and very public row break out after the government decided to<br />
formally abandon B+E testing as part of its plan to alleviate the national shortage of LGV drivers.<br />
From September 20, all B+E testing has stopped, with examiners who used to work on those tests<br />
now focusing solely on LGVs. The decision has understandably created a huge response, particularly<br />
from those instructors who used to work in this sector. Over the next four pages we will look at the<br />
decision in-depth, with MSA GB National Chairman Peter Harvey explaining the next steps forward.<br />
Peter Harvey mbe<br />
National Chairman<br />
MSA GB<br />
Every year, on average, around 30,000<br />
people in the UK take a DVSA car and<br />
trailer test – otherwise known as B+E<br />
testing. From September 20 onwards,<br />
however, the figure will be nil.<br />
This has come as a devastating blow<br />
to a lot of people. To those ADIs who<br />
have specialised in this sector, it has<br />
potentially destroyed their businesses.<br />
And to anyone interested in road safety, it<br />
is very upsetting and feels like a<br />
retrograde step that undoes decades of<br />
work to make car-and-trailer motoring<br />
safer on our roads.<br />
So how did it come to this? Put simply,<br />
a combination of Brexit and Covid has<br />
conspired to create a huge shortage in<br />
LGV drivers in the UK, and the government<br />
has decided that one way to stop this<br />
shortage crippling the UK economy is to<br />
direct all its examining resources at the<br />
LGV sector to boost numbers. As a<br />
result, B+E testing has stopped – and<br />
any road safety implications as far as<br />
cars and trailers are concerned is simply<br />
collateral damage that cannot be seen to<br />
take precedence over the bigger picture,<br />
of getting more LGV drivers in the cab.<br />
As someone who has spent decades<br />
working to improve road safety, I think<br />
this is a mistake. I also know many,<br />
many people at the DVSA feel the same<br />
as I do. It cannot be true that a driving<br />
situation which demanded extra training<br />
and testing to keep the public safe is no<br />
longer required. If it was thought right at<br />
the start of <strong>2021</strong> to train and test people<br />
if they wish to tow a trailer or caravan,<br />
then nothing has changed to alter this.<br />
However, this is a done deal. The<br />
government is highly unlikely to perform<br />
a U-turn. So where does that leave us?<br />
First, the legal bit. On September 21 it<br />
was not correct to say that someone<br />
who had passed their L-test after 1997<br />
can now drive and tow a trailer or<br />
caravan. It would still be against the law.<br />
Why? Because the law has not changed<br />
– yet. If you obtained your driving licence<br />
after 1997, when B+E testing was<br />
introduced, you still must obtain a<br />
car-and-trailer pass to tow. However, you<br />
can’t do this as there are no longer any<br />
B+E tests being conducted, leaving you<br />
effectively in no man’s land. At some<br />
point in the next few months the law will<br />
be changed but it has not happened yet.<br />
Only then will you be legally allowed to<br />
tow a trailer.<br />
Two, should B+E trainers give up? My<br />
advice is no. Consider this: most people<br />
are sensible. Most people, when asked<br />
the question, do you feel confident<br />
driving your car down the road, will<br />
answer ‘yes’. However, when you add the<br />
phrase ‘while towing a 2.5-tonne<br />
Do our views matter or is the government paying lip service?<br />
Continued from page 3<br />
Once the decision has been made there will be no going<br />
back.<br />
I suspect that there are some B+E serial failures, as in the<br />
other categories, they will now drive among us.<br />
We should spare some sympathy for the DVSA. As an<br />
Executive Agency its work is at the behest of the government<br />
of the day and ot has no influence on policy. I am sure there<br />
are many driving examiners and vehicle inspectors within the<br />
organisation that would question this decision but, like ADIs,<br />
their experience and expertise does not count.<br />
When we think of B+E safety, our minds immediately go to<br />
caravans strewn across motorways. Is there a risk of more<br />
farm/industrial incidents through lack of training? I am sure<br />
the Health & Safety Executive would have had a viewpoint.<br />
Much of the lorry driver shortages could be resolved through<br />
better working conditions and terms of employment. The<br />
average age of an LGV driver is 55 which shows younger<br />
people are not being encouraged into the industry. No problem<br />
will be resolved at the expense of road safety.<br />
08<br />
NEWSLINK n OCTOBER <strong>2021</strong>