28.09.2021 Views

Undergraduate Research: An Archive - 2021 Program

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Kailie McGeoy ’21<br />

PSYCHOLOGY<br />

Certificate in Environmental Studies<br />

POLICY, NORMS<br />

AND BEHAVIOR<br />

THESIS TITLE<br />

To Be a Sheep or to Be a<br />

Shepherd? How Political<br />

and Religious Identities<br />

Influence Environmental<br />

Dilemma Decisions and<br />

Post-Decision Emotions<br />

ADVISER<br />

Elke Weber, Gerhard R.<br />

<strong>An</strong>dlinger Professor in<br />

Energy and the<br />

Environment, Professor<br />

of Psychology and the<br />

School of Public and<br />

International Affairs<br />

Study participants were presented with a<br />

hypothetical commons (public resources)<br />

dilemma asking how many sheep they would own<br />

as part of a communal pasture. The two present<br />

studies tested religious and political identity<br />

salience and in-group behavior information<br />

against differences in repeated commons’<br />

dilemma choices and post-decision emotions.<br />

Participants were assigned to three groups<br />

where, before their second decision, they were<br />

told their in-group acted similarly to their first<br />

decision (congruent), dissimilarly (incongruent),<br />

or no information was provided (control). As<br />

expected, incongruent participants experienced<br />

significant differences between decisions in the<br />

direction of the in-group behavior. However,<br />

across both studies, participants that chose<br />

a low eco-friendly option in the first decision<br />

experienced significant decreases in their second<br />

decision regardless of treatment group. To our<br />

surprise, negative-emotion scores decreased<br />

significantly across studies and groups. In the<br />

religious study, social identity was a predictor<br />

of commons’ differences, regardless of first<br />

choice, and personal identity was a predictor of<br />

commons’ differences for participants who chose<br />

low eco-friendly first choices. These findings<br />

suggest that when identity is salient, non-ecoconscious<br />

behavior is more susceptible to change<br />

than eco-conscious behavior, and that negative<br />

emotions typically decrease between repeated<br />

measures, regardless of several variables.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!