Undergraduate Research: An Archive - 2021 Program

environment.princeton
from environment.princeton More from this publisher
28.09.2021 Views

Julia Ilhardt ’21 SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Certificate in Environmental Studies POLICY, NORMS AND BEHAVIOR THESIS TITLE The Fight for Fresh Air: Localized Movements for Environmental Justice and the Incremental Process of Policy Reform ADVISER Michael Oppenheimer, Albert G. Milbank Professor of Geosciences and International Affairs and the High Meadows Environmental Institute The environmental justice (EJ) movement has a decades-long history in the United States, driven by community-level activism against environmental harms that disproportionately impact communities of color and lowincome areas. My thesis sought to explain the transformation of EJ as a policy issue, to understand the mechanisms underlying grassroots activism, and to consider the role of various levels of government in addressing EJ. Case studies centered around industrial pollution in Detroit and Houston, as well as the impact of concentrated animal agriculture in southeastern North Carolina. I reviewed all introduced legislation and executive activity pertaining to these cases, then conducted interviews with local stakeholders. Based on my literature review, policy analysis and interview material, I applied theoretical lenses to explain the incremental progress of community-based actors in local EJ movements. Ultimately, this research suggests a number of policy priorities for centering communities in environmental discourse and ameliorating the disparate harms associated with pollution. 39

Hans Imhof ’21 SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS Certificate in Environmental Studies THESIS TITLE The Modernization of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 and Its Effects on Solar-Power Generation: An Analysis of the Implementation of PURPA in South Carolina ADVISER Gregory Jaczko, Lecturer in School of Public and International Affairs In South Carolina, one utility has primarily driven the incorporation of solar in the state’s electricity grid, meaning that state policies could push other utilities in the region to do the same. The complex differences between the utilities, however, decrease the transparency of rates, fees and contract structures despite being regulated by the same state-level institution. An analysis of the avoided cost rates, their implementation and the contract terms revealed that not all aspects of the standard offers are equally well-regulated. This has resulted in utility-scale solar projects being located in one utility’s territory. Fractions of cents have thousands of dollars' worth of consequences and allow for a distortion of the power dynamics between utilities, independent power producers and consumers. The new changes to Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) place more power in the hands of the utilities by increasing the tools available to them to set avoided costs, and by decreasing the certainty of returns on investments for solar investors and developers. Thus, these changes decrease the competitiveness of solar power. POLICY, NORMS AND BEHAVIOR 40

Hans Imhof ’21<br />

SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL<br />

AFFAIRS<br />

Certificate in Environmental Studies<br />

THESIS TITLE<br />

The Modernization of<br />

the Public Utility<br />

Regulatory Policies Act<br />

of 1978 and Its Effects<br />

on Solar-Power<br />

Generation: <strong>An</strong> <strong>An</strong>alysis<br />

of the Implementation<br />

of PURPA in South<br />

Carolina<br />

ADVISER<br />

Gregory Jaczko,<br />

Lecturer in School of<br />

Public and International<br />

Affairs<br />

In South Carolina, one utility has primarily<br />

driven the incorporation of solar in the state’s<br />

electricity grid, meaning that state policies could<br />

push other utilities in the region to do the same.<br />

The complex differences between the utilities,<br />

however, decrease the transparency of rates, fees<br />

and contract structures despite being regulated<br />

by the same state-level institution. <strong>An</strong> analysis of<br />

the avoided cost rates, their implementation and<br />

the contract terms revealed that not all aspects<br />

of the standard offers are equally well-regulated.<br />

This has resulted in utility-scale solar projects<br />

being located in one utility’s territory. Fractions<br />

of cents have thousands of dollars' worth of<br />

consequences and allow for a distortion of the<br />

power dynamics between utilities, independent<br />

power producers and consumers. The new<br />

changes to Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act<br />

of 1978 (PURPA) place more power in the hands<br />

of the utilities by increasing the tools available<br />

to them to set avoided costs, and by decreasing<br />

the certainty of returns on investments for solar<br />

investors and developers. Thus, these changes<br />

decrease the competitiveness of solar power.<br />

POLICY, NORMS<br />

AND BEHAVIOR<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!