Undergraduate Research: An Archive - 2021 Program
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Julia Harisay ’21<br />
SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL<br />
AFFAIRS<br />
Certificate in Environmental Studies<br />
THESIS TITLE<br />
What’s the Beef with the<br />
Media: The Effects of<br />
Social and Traditional<br />
Media on Biased<br />
Assimilation and<br />
Attitude Polarization on<br />
the Issue of Livestock<br />
Production and Climate<br />
Change<br />
ADVISER<br />
Emily Pronin, Associate<br />
Professor of<br />
Psychology and Public<br />
Affairs<br />
We face the challenge of meeting an increasing<br />
demand for food while also mitigating climate<br />
change. At the same time, Americans are<br />
extremely polarized on the issue of climate<br />
change, with many blaming the media for<br />
this division. My research examined how<br />
communicating the food demand dilemma<br />
through various types of media might<br />
convince people of the need to eat less<br />
meat. Raising livestock for consumption is a<br />
significant source of greenhouse gas emissions<br />
and habitat loss. Study participants were<br />
exposed to mixed evidence about the impact<br />
of livestock production on climate change<br />
through traditional or social media. I found<br />
that climate change believers found such<br />
information to be more credible and convincing<br />
when communicated on social media than in<br />
traditional media, while non-believers reported<br />
the opposite. Neither media type leads to<br />
significantly greater polarization, but social<br />
media appeared to have more of a negative<br />
impact than traditional media on a person’s<br />
belief in the impact of livestock production on<br />
climate change. My findings have important<br />
implications for how climate change information<br />
can be communicated via social media.<br />
POLICY, NORMS<br />
AND BEHAVIOR<br />
38