10.09.2021 Views

Dominick Salvatore Schaums Outline of Microeconomics, 4th edition Schaums Outline Series 2006

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

350 FINAL EXAMINATION

6. (a) The condition for Pareto optimum in production is that (MRTS LK ) x ¼ (MRTS LK ) y . If this condition did not

hold, the economy could increase its output of either X or Y without reducing the output of the other.

The condition for Pareto optimum in consumption is that (MRS xy ) A ¼ (MRS xy ) B . If this condition did not

hold, the satisfaction of either individual A or B could be increased without reducing the satisfaction or

welfare of the other. This represents an unequivocal increase in social welfare. The condition for Pareto

optimum in both production and exchange simultaneously is that MRT xy ¼ (MRS xy ) A ¼ (MRS xy ) B . If this

condition did not hold, a reorganization of the production-distribution process until this Pareto optimality condition

holds would represent an unequivocal increase in social welfare. Pareto optimum is a necessary, but not

sufficient, condition for maximum social welfare. For that, a social welfare function is also required. This is

based on ethical or value judgments about the relative “deservedness” of individuals A and B.

(b) If industry X is imperfectly competitive, it will produce the output for which MC x ¼ MR x , P x . Thus P x is

higher, Q x is lower, and fewer resources are used than if industry X were perfectly competitive. If another

industry, say industry Y, is perfectly competitive, it will produce where MC y ¼ MR y ¼ P y . Thus, MRT xy ¼

MC x /MC y , P x /P y , and so this economy does not reach Pareto optimum. Similarly, if the labor market is

perfectly competitive while the capital market is imperfectly competitive, the least-cost factor combination

in production is given by:

MP L =MRC L ¼ MP K =P K or MP L =MP K ¼ MRC L =P K . P L =P K

(c)

where MFC ¼ marginal factor cost. Thus, MRTS LK ¼ MP L /MP K . P L /P K , and so this economy does not

reach Pareto optimum.

In order to achieve Pareto optimum the marginal social benefit must equal the marginal social cost, the marginal

social cost must equal the marginal private cost. The existence of externalities and public goods will

cause some of these conditions not to hold, and so the economy cannot reach Pareto optimum, even if

perfect competition exists in every market. Furthermore, the economy will not reach a point of Pareto

optimum when there are public goods. The reason for this is that if X is a public good, the economy is in

equilibrium when MRT xy ¼ (MRS xy ) A ¼ (MRS xy ) B . However, since individuals A and B can both use each

unit of public good X at the same time, the equilibrium condition for maximum welfare is MRT xy ¼ (MRS xy ) A

þ (MRS xy ) B . Thus, perfect competition leads to the underproduction and the underconsumption of public

goods and does not lead to a Pareto optimum point.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!