10.09.2021 Views

Dominick Salvatore Schaums Outline of Microeconomics, 4th edition Schaums Outline Series 2006

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAP. 13] INPUT PRICING AND EMPLOYMENT 295

shift to the right to MRP 0 a (see Fig. 13-9). Thus, point A and point C are two points on the firm’s long-run d a .

(The movement from point B to point C is the internal effect of the change in P a .)

(b) Starting from the profit-maximizing point A, a fall in P a from $40 per unit causes the MRP a to exceed the new

and lower P a . Thus the firm, in its attempt to maximize its profits with respect to input A, expands its use of

input A (a movement down its unchanged MRP a curve). However, as the firm uses more of input A, the MP,

and thus the MRP curve of inputs complementary to input A, shifts up and to the right. Thus, the new and

higher MRP for these complementary inputs exceed their unchanged prices. So this profit-maximizing firm

expands its use of these complementary inputs, but this causes its MP a and thus its MRP a curve to shift up

and to the right.

(c) On the other hand, as the firm uses more of input A because of the fall in P a , the MP and thus the MRP curve of

each input which is a substitute for input A shifts down and to the left. Thus, the new and lower MRP for a

substitute input is now smaller than its unchanged price. As a result the firm will reduce its use of these substitute

inputs, but this causes the firm’s MP a and thus the MRP a curve to shift even further to the right.

(d ) These shifts in the firm’s MRP curves (of input A, their complements and substitutes) and the corresponding

changes in the firm’s utilization of all of these inputs will continue until the firm has once again reestablished

its profit-maximizing position with respect to all of its variable inputs. The more and better is the availability

of inputs which are complementary and substitutes for input A, the further to the right the firm’s MRP a curve

shifts and the more elastic is the firm’s long-run d a .

13.6 Suppose that the external effect of the fall in P a from $40 to $20 per unit causes the d a of each of 100

identical firms demanding input A to shift from the d a in Fig. 13-9 everywhere to the left by two units.

(a) Derive D a geometrically and (b) explain how this external effect of the change in P a operates on each

firm. (c) What are the determinants of the price elasticity of D a ?

(a)

Fig. 13-10

(b)

(c)

Starting from the profit-maximizing point A, ifP a falls (because, for example, S a increases), the MRP a . P a

for each firm using input A. Thus, each firm expands its use of input A. But as all firms expand their use of

input A, the S x increases (i.e., shifts down and to the right). Given D x , this causes a fall in P x . Since the d a of

each firm was drawn on the assumption of a given and constant P x , when P x falls, the MRP a curve of each firm

shifts to the left and causes the d a of each firm also to shift to the left (from d a to da 0 in Fig. 13-10). It is the

quantity demanded on these lower da 0 curves that are added in order to get a new QD a (and thus another point

on D a ) when P a falls.

D a is more price-elastic, the more price-elastic D x , the more and better the availability of substitutes and

complements of input A, the more price-elastic the supply curve of these other related inputs, and the

longer the period of time under consideration.

13.7 Given the D a in Fig. 13-10(b) and QS a ¼ 40P a (with P a given in dollars), determine geometrically the

market equilibrium P a and Q a . How much of input A would each of 100 identical firms use?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!