06.09.2021 Views

Discrete Mathematics- An Open Introduction - 3rd Edition, 2016a

Discrete Mathematics- An Open Introduction - 3rd Edition, 2016a

Discrete Mathematics- An Open Introduction - 3rd Edition, 2016a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Selected Solutions 363<br />

F 2k+3 − 1<br />

by recursive def.<br />

Therefore F 0 + F 2 + F 4 + · · · + F 2k+2 F 2k+3 − 1, which is to say P(k + 1)<br />

holds. Therefore by the principle of mathematical induction, P(n) is true<br />

for all n ≥ 0.<br />

<br />

2.5.6.<br />

Proof. Let P(n) be the statement 2 n < n!. We will show P(n) is true for<br />

all n ≥ 4. First, we check the base case and see that yes, 2 4 < 4! (as 16 < 24)<br />

so P(4) is true. Now for the inductive case. Assume P(k) is true for an<br />

arbitrary k ≥ 4. That is, 2 k < k!. Now consider P(k + 1): 2 k+1 < (k + 1)!. To<br />

prove this, we start with the left side and work to the right side.<br />

2 k+1 2 · 2 k<br />

< 2 · k! by the inductive hypothesis<br />

< (k + 1) · k! since k + 1 > 2<br />

(k + 1)!<br />

Therefore 2 k+1 < (k + 1)! so we have established P(k + 1). Thus by the<br />

principle of mathematical induction P(n) is true for all n ≥ 4. <br />

2.5.12. The only problem is that we never established the base case. Of<br />

course, when n 0, 0 + 3 0 + 7.<br />

2.5.13.<br />

Proof. Let P(n) be the statement that n + 3 < n + 7. We will prove that<br />

P(n) is true for all n ∈ N. First, note that the base case holds: 0 + 3 < 0 + 7.<br />

Now assume for induction that P(k) is true. That is, k + 3 < k + 7. We must<br />

show that P(k + 1) is true. Now since k + 3 < k + 7, add 1 to both sides.<br />

This gives k + 3 + 1 < k + 7 + 1. Regrouping (k + 1) + 3 < (k + 1) + 7. But<br />

this is simply P(k + 1). Thus by the principle of mathematical induction<br />

P(n) is true for all n ∈ N.<br />

<br />

2.5.14. The problem here is that while P(0) is true, and while P(k) →<br />

P(k + 1) for some values of k, there is at least one value of k (namely k 99)<br />

when that implication fails. For a valid proof by induction, P(k) → P(k + 1)<br />

must be true for all values of k greater than or equal to the base case.<br />

2.5.16. We once again failed to establish the base case: when n 0,<br />

n 2 + n 0 which is even, not odd.<br />

2.5.19. The proof will be by strong induction.<br />

Proof. Let P(n) be the statement “n is either a power of 2 or can be written<br />

as the sum of distinct powers of 2.” We will show that P(n) is true for all<br />

n ≥ 1.<br />

Base case: 1 2 0 is a power of 2, so P(1) is true.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!