06.09.2021 Views

College Trigonometry, 2011a

College Trigonometry, 2011a

College Trigonometry, 2011a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11.6 Hooked on Conics Again 981<br />

1. We have A = 21, B =10 √ 3andC =31soB 2 − 4AC =(10 √ 3) 2 − 4(21)(31) = −2304 < 0.<br />

Theorem 11.11 predicts the graph is an ellipse, which checks with our work from Example<br />

11.6.1 number 2.<br />

2. Here, A =5,B =26andC =5,soB 2 − 4AC =26 2 − 4(5)(5) = 576 > 0. Theorem 11.11<br />

classifies the graph as a hyperbola, which matches our answer to Example 11.6.2 number 1.<br />

3. Finally, we have A = 16, B =24andC = 9 which gives 24 2 − 4(16)(9) = 0. Theorem 11.11<br />

tells us that the graph is a parabola, matching our result from Example 11.6.2 number 2.<br />

11.6.2 The Polar Form of Conics<br />

In this subsection, we start from scratch to reintroduce the conic sections from a more unified<br />

perspective. We have our ‘new’ definition below.<br />

Definition 11.1. Given a fixed line L, apointF not on L, and a positive number e, aconic<br />

section is the set of all points P such that<br />

the distance from P to F<br />

the distance from P to L = e<br />

The line L is called the directrix of the conic section, the point F is called a focus of the conic<br />

section, and the constant e is called the eccentricity of the conic section.<br />

We have seen the notions of focus and directrix before in the definition of a parabola, Definition 7.3.<br />

There, a parabola is defined as the set of points equidistant from the focus and directrix, giving an<br />

eccentricity e = 1 according to Definition 11.1. We have also seen the concept of eccentricity before.<br />

It was introduced for ellipses in Definition 7.5 in Section 7.4, and later extended to hyperbolas in<br />

Exercise 31 in Section 7.5. There,e was also defined as a ratio of distances, though in these cases<br />

the distances involved were measurements from the center to a focus and from the center to a<br />

vertex. One way to reconcile the ‘old’ ideas of focus, directrix and eccentricity with the ‘new’ ones<br />

presented in Definition 11.1 is to derive equations for the conic sections using Definition 11.1 and<br />

compare these parameters with what we know from Chapter 7. We begin by assuming the conic<br />

section has eccentricity e, afocusF at the origin and that the directrix is the vertical line x = −d<br />

as in the figure below.<br />

y<br />

d<br />

r cos(θ)<br />

P (r, θ)<br />

r<br />

θ<br />

x = −d<br />

O = F<br />

x

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!