06.09.2021 Views

College Algebra & Trigonometry, 2018a

College Algebra & Trigonometry, 2018a

College Algebra & Trigonometry, 2018a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

140 CHAPTER 3. EXPONENTS AND LOGARITHMS<br />

The next type of mathematical relationshp is a multiplicative relationship. This<br />

represents a situation in which one quantity is always a multiple of the other<br />

quantity. This is commonly seen in proportional relationships. If a recipe for a<br />

cake calls for 2 cups of flour, then, if we want to make 3 cakes, we’ll need 6 cups<br />

of flour. The amount of flour (y) is always two times the number of cakes we<br />

want to make (x): y =2x.<br />

If a recipe for a batch of cookies (with 20 cookies per batch) calls for 1.5 cups<br />

of sugar, then three batches would require 4.5 cups of sugar. The amount of<br />

sugar required (y) is always the number of batches (x) times 1.5: y =1.5x. Ifwe<br />

wanted to represent this relationship based on the number of cookies instead of<br />

the number of batches, we would need to adjust the formula. Given that there are<br />

20 cookies per batch, we could adjust our formula so that we first calculate the<br />

number of batches from the number of cookies and then multiply by 1.5. If the<br />

number of cookies is x and the amount of sugar is y, then y =1.5 ∗ x or y = 3 x.<br />

20 40<br />

The next type of mathematical relationship is the polynomial relationship. In this<br />

type of relationship, one quantity is related to a power of another quantity. A<br />

good example of this type of relationship involves gravity. As Galileo discovered<br />

in the 16th century, the distance that an object falls after it is dropped is not<br />

proportional to the time that it has been falling. Rather, it is proportional to the<br />

square of the time. The table below shows this type of relationship.<br />

t<br />

d<br />

1 16<br />

2 64<br />

3 144<br />

4 256<br />

After one second, it looks like the distance will always be sixteen times the time<br />

the object has been falling. However, after two seconds, we can see that this<br />

relationship no longer is true. That’s because this relationship is a polynomial<br />

relationship in which the distance an object has fallen (d) is proportional to the<br />

square of the time it has been falling (t): d =16t 2 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!