Instruction in Functional Assessment, 2014a
Instruction in Functional Assessment, 2014a
Instruction in Functional Assessment, 2014a
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Instruction</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Functional</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> Chapter 3<br />
C. Reactive procedures or what to do<br />
when the challeng<strong>in</strong>g behavior occurs<br />
An EXTINCTION procedure <strong>in</strong>volves no longer provid<strong>in</strong>g the re<strong>in</strong>forcer ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the<br />
challeng<strong>in</strong>g behavior such that the behavior is less likely <strong>in</strong> future similar situations (Mart<strong>in</strong><br />
& Pear, 2011). The re<strong>in</strong>forcer ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s challeng<strong>in</strong>g behavior must be<br />
identified and no longer provided. Thus, when the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s challeng<strong>in</strong>g behavior is be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by attention then attention ext<strong>in</strong>ction should be used. For escape-ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
behavior, escape ext<strong>in</strong>ction, or not remov<strong>in</strong>g the task or demand (and, possibly, us<strong>in</strong>g guided<br />
assistance for the <strong>in</strong>dividual to engage <strong>in</strong> the task) is employed. An FA to determ<strong>in</strong>e what<br />
is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s challeng<strong>in</strong>g behavior is essential to be able to accurately<br />
remove the re<strong>in</strong>forcer ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the challeng<strong>in</strong>g behavior and thereby effectively use an<br />
ext<strong>in</strong>ction procedure. Iwata, Pace, Cowdery, and Miltenberger (1994) describe how not<br />
correctly remov<strong>in</strong>g the re<strong>in</strong>forcer ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s challeng<strong>in</strong>g behavior can<br />
actually worsen it.<br />
A known phenomenon that occurs when implement<strong>in</strong>g an ext<strong>in</strong>ction procedure is<br />
EXTINCTION BURST whereby the behavior be<strong>in</strong>g ext<strong>in</strong>guished gets “worse before it gets<br />
better.” That is, emotional behaviors and aggression, <strong>in</strong> addition to an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> severity<br />
of the challeng<strong>in</strong>g behavior may occur (Mart<strong>in</strong> & Pear, 2011). It is important to <strong>in</strong>form<br />
others about this phenomenon to ensure that they cont<strong>in</strong>ue implement<strong>in</strong>g the program and<br />
do not <strong>in</strong>advertently re<strong>in</strong>force the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s problem behavior and make it worse (i.e.,<br />
TREATMENT INTEGRITY is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed).<br />
An effective and ethical approach is to comb<strong>in</strong>e ext<strong>in</strong>ction with positive <strong>in</strong>tervention<br />
strategies (e.g., differential re<strong>in</strong>forcement). Out of a sample of 42 cases of treatment for<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals with challeng<strong>in</strong>g behavior, Lerman, Iwata, and Wallace (1999) counted the<br />
number <strong>in</strong> which an ext<strong>in</strong>ction burst was identified and exam<strong>in</strong>ed whether positive procedures<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the treatment package lessened the likelihood of ext<strong>in</strong>ction bursts. The<br />
researchers found substantially fewer cases of ext<strong>in</strong>ction burst (i.e., 15%) when positive<br />
procedures were <strong>in</strong>corporated as compared to when only an ext<strong>in</strong>ction procedure was used<br />
(i.e., 62%).<br />
Although there are ethical concerns with us<strong>in</strong>g any decelerative procedure, sometimes<br />
ext<strong>in</strong>ction must be used to effectively decrease the <strong>in</strong>dividual’s problem behavior. In a study<br />
by Patal et al. (2002) two types of differential re<strong>in</strong>forcement procedures were not effective<br />
until escape ext<strong>in</strong>ction was added with three children receiv<strong>in</strong>g treatment for feed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
disorders. See Table 17 below for methods to <strong>in</strong>crease the effectiveness of an ext<strong>in</strong>ction<br />
procedure.<br />
43